<html>

<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:Tahoma;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
        {size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple>

<div class=Section1>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Does anyone know if there is a document that lists the
differences or benefits of using either MGCP or H323.</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>I need to install a gateway for PSTN breakout in a DR site
so it won&#8217;t be needed for redundancy or anything like that. </span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>All our branch offices currently use H323 and we have H323
for our HQ so that they can be used for redundancy should be an issue with the
local branch PSTN. </span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Just wondering whether it might be better to go with MGCP in
this instance.</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Is it easier to mask the calling numbers with MGCP?</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

</div>

<br><br><table bgcolor=white style="color:black"><tr><td><br>***********************************************************************************************<br>
<br>
The&nbsp;information&nbsp;contained&nbsp;in&nbsp;this&nbsp;e-mail&nbsp;is&nbsp;strictly&nbsp;confidential,&nbsp;some&nbsp;or&nbsp;all<br>
of&nbsp;which&nbsp;may&nbsp;be&nbsp;legally&nbsp;privileged.&nbsp;It&nbsp;is&nbsp;for&nbsp;the&nbsp;intended&nbsp;recipient&nbsp;only.<br>
Access&nbsp;to&nbsp;this&nbsp;e-mail&nbsp;by&nbsp;any&nbsp;other&nbsp;person&nbsp;is&nbsp;prohibited.&nbsp;If&nbsp;you&nbsp;are&nbsp;not&nbsp;the<br>
intended&nbsp;recipient,&nbsp;any&nbsp;use,&nbsp;disclosure,&nbsp;copying,&nbsp;printing,&nbsp;distribution&nbsp;of,<br>
replying&nbsp;to&nbsp;or&nbsp;any&nbsp;action&nbsp;taken&nbsp;or&nbsp;omitted&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;taken&nbsp;in&nbsp;reliance&nbsp;on&nbsp;this<br>
e-mail,&nbsp;is&nbsp;prohibited&nbsp;and&nbsp;may&nbsp;be&nbsp;unlawful.&nbsp;Please&nbsp;contact&nbsp;the&nbsp;sender&nbsp;immediately<br>
should&nbsp;this&nbsp;e-mail&nbsp;have&nbsp;been&nbsp;incorrectly&nbsp;addressed&nbsp;or&nbsp;transmitted.<br>
<br>
You&nbsp;accept&nbsp;that&nbsp;any&nbsp;instructions&nbsp;are&nbsp;deemed&nbsp;to&nbsp;have&nbsp;been&nbsp;given&nbsp;at&nbsp;the&nbsp;time&nbsp;the<br>
recipient(s)&nbsp;accesses&nbsp;them&nbsp;and&nbsp;that&nbsp;delivery&nbsp;receipt&nbsp;does&nbsp;not&nbsp;constitute<br>
acknowledgement&nbsp;or&nbsp;receipt&nbsp;by&nbsp;the&nbsp;intended&nbsp;recipient(s).&nbsp;You&nbsp;accept&nbsp;that&nbsp;there<br>
may&nbsp;be&nbsp;a&nbsp;delay&nbsp;in&nbsp;processing&nbsp;the&nbsp;instructions&nbsp;received&nbsp;from&nbsp;e-mails&nbsp;after<br>
Charles&nbsp;Stanley&nbsp;has&nbsp;received&nbsp;them.&nbsp;You&nbsp;are&nbsp;advised&nbsp;that&nbsp;urgent,&nbsp;time&nbsp;sensitive<br>
and&nbsp;confidential&nbsp;communications&nbsp;should&nbsp;not&nbsp;be&nbsp;sent&nbsp;by&nbsp;e-mail.&nbsp;<br>
<br>
You&nbsp;acknowledge&nbsp;that&nbsp;e-mails&nbsp;are&nbsp;not&nbsp;secure&nbsp;and&nbsp;you&nbsp;accept&nbsp;the&nbsp;risk&nbsp;of<br>
malfunction,&nbsp;viruses,&nbsp;unauthorised&nbsp;interference,&nbsp;mis-delivery&nbsp;or&nbsp;delay.<br>
************************************************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
Charles&nbsp;Stanley&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;Co.&nbsp;Ltd<br>
Registered&nbsp;Office:&nbsp;25&nbsp;Luke&nbsp;Street&nbsp;London&nbsp;EC2A&nbsp;4AR<br>
<br>
Tel:&nbsp;0207&nbsp;739&nbsp;8200&nbsp;Fax:&nbsp;0207&nbsp;739&nbsp;7798<br>
Registered&nbsp;in&nbsp;England&nbsp;No.&nbsp;1903304<br>
<br>
Charles&nbsp;Stanley&nbsp;Sutherlands&nbsp;and&nbsp;Charles&nbsp;Stanley&nbsp;Securities&nbsp;are&nbsp;divisions&nbsp;of&nbsp;Charles&nbsp;Stanley&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;Co.&nbsp;Ltd<br>
<br>
Authorised&nbsp;and&nbsp;Regulated&nbsp;by&nbsp;the&nbsp;Financial&nbsp;Services&nbsp;Authority,&nbsp;Member&nbsp;of&nbsp;the<br>
London&nbsp;Stock&nbsp;Exchange,&nbsp;International&nbsp;Securities&nbsp;Markets&nbsp;Association,&nbsp;and&nbsp;The&nbsp;London&nbsp;International&nbsp;Financial&nbsp;Futures&nbsp;&amp;<br>
Options&nbsp;Exchange.<br>
<br>
This&nbsp;footnote&nbsp;also&nbsp;confirms&nbsp;that&nbsp;this&nbsp;email&nbsp;message&nbsp;has&nbsp;been&nbsp;swept&nbsp;by&nbsp;McAfee<br>
VirusScan&nbsp;and&nbsp;SurfControl&nbsp;Email&nbsp;Filter&nbsp;software.<br>
</td></tr></table></body>

</html>