<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:Tahoma;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
        {size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Does anyone know if there is a document that lists the
differences or benefits of using either MGCP or H323.</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>I need to install a gateway for PSTN breakout in a DR site
so it won’t be needed for redundancy or anything like that. </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>All our branch offices currently use H323 and we have H323
for our HQ so that they can be used for redundancy should be an issue with the
local branch PSTN. </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Just wondering whether it might be better to go with MGCP in
this instance.</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Is it easier to mask the calling numbers with MGCP?</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<br><br><table bgcolor=white style="color:black"><tr><td><br>***********************************************************************************************<br>
<br>
The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all<br>
of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only.<br>
Access to this e-mail by any other person is prohibited. If you are not the<br>
intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of,<br>
replying to or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this<br>
e-mail, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender immediately<br>
should this e-mail have been incorrectly addressed or transmitted.<br>
<br>
You accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the<br>
recipient(s) accesses them and that delivery receipt does not constitute<br>
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s). You accept that there<br>
may be a delay in processing the instructions received from e-mails after<br>
Charles Stanley has received them. You are advised that urgent, time sensitive<br>
and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. <br>
<br>
You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of<br>
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised interference, mis-delivery or delay.<br>
************************************************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd<br>
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR<br>
<br>
Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798<br>
Registered in England No. 1903304<br>
<br>
Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd<br>
<br>
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the<br>
London Stock Exchange, International Securities Markets Association, and The London International Financial Futures &<br>
Options Exchange.<br>
<br>
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee<br>
VirusScan and SurfControl Email Filter software.<br>
</td></tr></table></body>
</html>