<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Here is a start on validating the agent NIC. it claims for Enterprise,
but that is no longer the case.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1844/products_tech_note09186a00801f42f9.shtml">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1844/products_tech_note09186a00801f42f9.shtml</a><br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
Jason Aarons (US) wrote:
<blockquote
cite="midC1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F0032808E5@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
..shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<title>Message</title>
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:Arial;
        color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:Arial;
        color:navy;}
span.EmailStyle19
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:Arial;
        color:navy;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
        {mso-list-id:582615556;
        mso-list-type:hybrid;
        mso-list-template-ids:1722327106 67698709 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
        {mso-level-number-format:alpha-upper;
        mso-level-tab-stop:.5in;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
ol
        {margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
        {margin-bottom:0in;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">In IPCC
Express 4.X there are two types of
monitoring;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<ol style="margin-top: 0in;" start="1" type="A">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="color: navy;"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">SPAN Based (old school)<o:p></o:p></span></font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="color: navy;"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Agent Monitoring (CAD
acts as sniffer on desktops, new to 4.x)<o:p></o:p></span></font></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">If option B
is being used, is the NIC a
Intel 10/100 Pro or a 3COM 905? I’ve had issues with these NICs not
being
able to sniff packets tagged. There are CCO.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">TAC has a
extensive troubleshooting process
for monitoring I haven’t seen on CCO anywhere.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><font
face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
<hr tabindex="-1" align="center" size="2" width="100%"></span></font></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-weight: bold;">From:</span></font></b><font
face="Tahoma" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma;">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] <b><span
style="font-weight: bold;">On Behalf Of </span></b>Gary L. Pate<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Thursday,
September 14, 2006
10:58 PM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [cisco-voip]
IPCC silent
monitoring</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span
style="font-size: 12pt;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">I have a
client using IPCC 4.0 enhanced
version, and they are able to use all the enhanced features except the
monitoring
function. As I understand it, this version does not require you to span
the
ports, but their ports are spanned anyway because they are using a
third party
recording device to record all conversations. Anyway, barge in,
intercept, etc.
work, and when they do the monitoring, the applications acts like its
working,
but they do not hear anything coming out of the PC speakers even though
its
been confirmed that the speakers do work. Is there anything special
that the
workstation needs to monitor?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<hr size="1"><br>
<p><strong><br>
Disclaimer:<br>
<br>
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>
from your computer. Thank you.<br>
</strong></p>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>