<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=129005723-18092006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>If you were to run a Debian based server, you can get
Cricket as a package. Then use the tools from Acktomic's site to
automatically scan interfaces and create Cricket configuration files. This
will include QoS configurations. You'll then be able to monitor statistics
on a per class/interface basis.</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Kris
Seraphine<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, September 18, 2006 18:54<BR><B>To:</B>
cisco-voip<BR><B>Subject:</B> [cisco-voip] Recommendations for inexpensive
monitoring tool<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Hi<BR><BR>I have a small customer with a centralized CCM cluster and
13 remote sites with between 4 and 25 phones at each site. They currently
have no network monitoring solution implemented and they are not willing to
spend much money on one. I'm looking for recommendations for
inexpensive WAN link monitoring applications. I'd like to see utilization
on different classes of traffic; either based on port or better yet on
dscp values. I'm thinking about using PRTG but thought I'd see if anyone
else has a better suggestion. <BR><BR>thanks<BR clear=all><BR>-- <BR>kris
seraphine <BR>-- <BR>Scanned for viruses & dangerous content at <A
href="http://www.oneunified.net">One Unified</A> and is believed to be clean.
</BODY><br />--
<br />Scanned for viruses & dangerous content at
<a href="http://www.oneunified.net">One Unified</a>
and is believed to be clean.
</HTML>