I agree with you - I think given the number of ports on these things having a batch tool to program callmanager seems like an obvious feature that people would need. They have a feature in there to program the old VG200's though...
<br><br>That said, if there is no way to program the 248 with BAT (which I think there should have been), I can sorta see why they didnt immediately release a tool for the 224 either. Don't necessarily like it, but I can see the reasoning.
<br><br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/19/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Adam</b> <<a href="mailto:cisco@adman.net">cisco@adman.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Don't get me wrong, I agree that it is a better product than the<br>VG248... I just think that if you're going to push a product to market<br>that way that the tools to support it should come at the same time,<br>not on a product roadmap that's so far in the future that all bets are
<br>off as to when it might appear.<br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Ed Leatherman<br>Senior Voice Engineer<br>West Virginia University<br>Telecommunications and Network Operations