<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=481424918-21112006><FONT face=Arial size=2>I
was able to set this up in a lab finally. The setup is two separate CCM
5.04 clusters with gatekeeper-controlled intercluster trunks. AAR
within a cluster works as expected.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=481424918-21112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=481424918-21112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Unless I messed something up, an ARJ from gatekeeper does not invoke
AAR. You have to put a route group for a gateway into the route list so
you have PSTN backup in this scenario.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=481424918-21112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=481424918-21112006><FONT face=Arial size=2>I
tried gatekeeper "bandwidth interzone..." CAC as well as just
locations-based CAC on the ICT and remote phone. All gave me fast-busy if
there wasn't enough bandwidth for a given location. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=481424918-21112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=481424918-21112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Hope this helps.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=481424918-21112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=481424918-21112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Howard,
Chad<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, November 17, 2006 5:22 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Wes Sisk;
Jonathan Charles<BR><B>Cc:</B> ciscovoip<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] AAR
question...<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=205030223-17112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Another question along the same lines...</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=205030223-17112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=205030223-17112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2>If using gatekeeper for intercluster calls (dial resolution
only, not CAC on the gatekeeper itself), does CM distinguish between
between a reject due to "the DN does not exist on the remote cluster" versus
"insufficient location bandwith" on the remote
cluster ?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=205030223-17112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=205030223-17112006><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Or does an 'insufficient bandwidth' rejection have to come from the
gatekeeper's locally configured CAC in order to invoke AAR? (all rejects
from remote clusters look the same regardless of underlying
reason)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=205030223-17112006></SPAN><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=2>T<SPAN
class=205030223-17112006>hanks.</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Wes
Sisk<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, November 17, 2006 4:34 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Jonathan
Charles<BR><B>Cc:</B> ciscovoip<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] AAR
question...<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>AAR works with ARJ as well. CM will reroute using AAR
CSS.<BR><BR>/Wes<BR><BR>Jonathan Charles wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid5d093f9a0611170829q4fdf0ad8v644a4599b43d1f00@mail.gmail.com
type="cite">Found this quote in the SRND for 4.1:<BR><BR>"<SPAN class=content>
Automated alternate routing (AAR) provides a mechanism to reroute calls
through the PSTN or other network by using an alternate number when
Cisco CallManager blocks a call due to insufficient location
bandwidth."<BR><BR>My question is, what happens if a Gatekeeper rejects the
call, does this count as 'insufficient location bandwidth' or does AAR only
work if locations-based bandwidth is exceeded?
<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Jonathan<BR></SPAN><PRE wrap=""><HR width="90%" SIZE=4>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A>
<A class=moz-txt-link-freetext href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A>
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain proprietary and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
</PRE></BODY></HTML>
<pre>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain proprietary and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.