<div>Group,</div>
<div> I was making a network change last night and had an odd result. I had a 2821 with an MGCP PRI and 2 WIC cards with PtP T1s. I took the WIC cards out and installed them in a 1760 to separate the WAN function from the VG functions. After taking out the 2 WICs I applied the following changes to the 2821 VG....
</div>
<div>
<p><strong>IP addresses taken out to maintain some anonymity</strong><br>!<br>logging buffered 64000 debugging<br>!<br>!<br>no ip dhcp use vrf connected<br>no ip dhcp excluded-address x.x.x.x<br>no ip dhcp excluded-address
x.x.x.x<br>!<br>no ip dhcp pool techs-only<br>!<br>no ip dhcp pool PHONES<br>!<br>!<br>!<br>!<br>!<br>!<br>!<br>interface Loopback0<br> description H323/MOH/Multicast<br> ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx <a href="http://255.255.255.255">
255.255.255.255</a></p>
<p> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Add these commands, not present prior to change<br> h323-gateway voip interface<br> h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx<br>!<br>interface GigabitEthernet0/0.100<br> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Change IP to non-default gateway
<br> ip address x.x.x.x <a href="http://255.255.255.192">255.255.255.192</a><br><br>!<br>no interface GigabitEthernet0/0.200</p>
<p>!<br>interface GigabitEthernet0/1<br>no ip address<br>shut</p>
<p>!</p>
<p>!<br>router eigrp 1<br> no network xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx <a href="http://0.0.0.3">0.0.0.3</a><br> no network xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx <a href="http://0.0.0.3">0.0.0.3</a><br> no network xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx <a href="http://0.0.0.255">0.0.0.255
</a><br> no network xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx <a href="http://0.0.0.15">0.0.0.15</a><br><br>no ip route <a href="http://0.0.0.0">0.0.0.0</a> <a href="http://0.0.0.0">0.0.0.0</a> YYY.yyy.yyy.yyy<br>ip route <a href="http://0.0.0.0">
0.0.0.0</a> <a href="http://0.0.0.0">0.0.0.0</a> XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX</p>
<p>!<br>dspfarm profile 20 transcode<br>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> no shut<br>!<br>!</p>
<p>end</p>
<p>wr mem</p>
<p>As you can see I did not take out the "isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager" command from the ser0/2/0:23 interface. The only thing that I can think may have done this was the Lo0 commands that I added for h323 binding.
</p>
<p>Anyone have an answer as to why this would have happened and made for an uneasy change?</p>
<p>Steve</p></div>