<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=375093503-24012007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>I asked this question specifically to the BU regarding
Route Filter 1024 limits. I was told that this was fixed in CallManager
5.0 and I have tested it to be accurate. This problem was directly related
to a SQL limitation.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=375093503-24012007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=375093503-24012007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>I have not tested the 1024 limit for CSS partition
members.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=375093503-24012007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=375093503-24012007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>The 1024 limit does not apply to phones because CallManager
makes the decisions on both Route Filters and CSS partition members, it does not
send the list to be parsed by the phone.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=375093503-24012007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=375093503-24012007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Lelio
Fulgenzi<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:35 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Robert
Singleton; Voip List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] 512+512 char limit for
calling searchspace+ CallManager 5.x<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>wow, i pretty much remember someone pointing out the SQL issue
myself. i'm not sure how a phone has anything to do with it's callingsearchspace
and why it would store it locally, all that processing is done on the
callmanager.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>from what i gather, as someone also alluded to, the SQL table
supports 1024 characters. if you look at the database, the callingsearchspace
table has a clause column which is 1024 characters and is not concatenated in
any way.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>i wonder if there is some sort of SQL operation going on in
realtime that then hits this 1024 character when it does concatenate
things.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>Lelio
Fulgenzi, B.A.<BR>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1<BR>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
(JNHN)<BR>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<BR>I'm changing my name to iPhone. Who do I pay trademark rights to?<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=rsingleton@novateck.com href="mailto:rsingleton@novateck.com">Robert
Singleton</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">Voip List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:14
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] 512+512 char
limit for calling search space+ CallManager 5.x</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:26 -0500, Lelio Fulgenzi
wrote:<BR>> Does anyone know if the 512+512 character limit for a calling
search<BR>> space was modified in CallManager 5.x? This was based on some
SQL<BR>> issue I believe as it expanded the calling search space out to
the<BR>> actual names of the partitions.<BR><BR>A TAC engineer once told me
that the base source of this limitation was<BR>because RAM allocation
limitations in the telephones themselves was only<BR>1024 bytes.<BR><BR>I must
admit that it seems a bit unlikely that every model of Cisco<BR>telephone,
some of which were originally designed and manufactured by<BR>different
companies, would suffer the exact same limitation. Maybe it's<BR>a lowest
common denominator
thing...<BR><BR>Robert<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
<HTML><BODY><P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG>
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
</STRONG></P></BODY></HTML>