<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Ted,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">This really is not true. We have
a full mesh network through VPN and we use CCM CAC and it works great.
We have calls from and to many sites at one point in time. How
locations work in CCM is that you add all things physically at the site
into one location and so on. There for even if you have 20 sites
all connected any call out of that site will count against the total. I
also do not know why GK wouldn't be able to do the same thing as it works
the same way.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Craig<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Ted Nugent <tednugent69@yahoo.com></b>
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">02/01/2007 07:31 PM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">embeleco <embeleco@gmail.com>,
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [cisco-voip] CAC Recommendation
for a VoIP Network</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Unless you "force" the voice path to hub-spoke
which<br>
could break your CAC if a link goes down your stuck<br>
using RSVP. Neither GK CAC nor Locations based CAC are<br>
Topology aware and require a hub spoke topology of<br>
some sort.<br>
<br>
<br>
--- embeleco <embeleco@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi.<br>
> <br>
> I would like CAC recommendations for a VoIP network<br>
> that consist of 6-10<br>
> (backbone sites) sites connected in a fully mesh<br>
> topology (not<br>
> hub-and-spoke). Currently is a toll-by-pass solution<br>
> consisting of Legacy<br>
> PBX connected to Cisco VoIP Gateways using<br>
> ISDN-PRI/Q.SIG signaling. Also<br>
> customer has Gatekeepers in order to centralized<br>
> dialplan. We are defining<br>
> which CAC (Call Admission Control) to use with the<br>
> fully mesh topology.<br>
> <br>
> We were thinking to use CAC at the gatekeeper but<br>
> that will work best for<br>
> hub and spoke scenarios. It meas that gatekeepers<br>
> will not know where the<br>
> call is going within the network... the other CAC<br>
> solution that we are<br>
> considering is RSVP.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Any suggestions? Recommendations? Which CAC solution<br>
> to consider?<br>
> <br>
> Thanks in advanced.<br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>
> <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
____________________________________________________________________________________<br>
Need Mail bonding?<br>
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.<br>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>
</font></tt>
<br>