Thanks... I tested it and it works fine...<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/13/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matthew Saskin</b> <<a href="mailto:matt@saskin.net">matt@saskin.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
yes indeed - works fine in my environment<br><br>-matt<br><br>Jonathan Charles wrote:<br>> Configuring a new 6513... curious, my Supervisors have SFPs on them<br>> and we have a bunch... was wondering, can I create a port channel
<br>> across different blades, so if I lose a blade, I don't lose the uplink?<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> Jonathan<br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>>
<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br></blockquote></div><br>