It is 80K in each direction.<br><br>So, if you set the locations-based bandwidth to 160K, you can support two calls.<br><br>You need to separate out actual bandwidth used with bandwidth calculated by CCM.<br><br>So, for 512K, you can support five calls (400K in Locations-based bandwidth) or
434.7K in actual bandwidth.<br><br><br><br><br>Jonathan<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">STEVEN CASPER</b> <<a href="mailto:SCASPER@mandtbank.com">SCASPER@mandtbank.com</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Ok so I have a site with 512K committed access rate for voice calls<br>across a WAN link. I am using a G711 codec which is using 86K per call.
<br>I figure I can have 5 simultaneous calls across the link. Using the<br>Cisco Voice Codec Bandwidth Calculator it shows I will consume 434.7<br>kbps<br><br> Looking at Locations in Call Manager it indicates that it calculates
<br>2 80K audio streams per call for a G711 codec. Does that mean I want to<br>set my audio bandwidth to 800K (160K*5)?<br>Does this make sense?<br><br>Thanks!<br><br>Steve Casper<br>Voice Technologies<br>M&T Bank<br>
(410) 347-6026<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br></blockquote></div><br>