Initially, the first ephone-dn CFB to the next ephone DN... this didn't work with a dual-line ephone (because it hunts to the next channel on the first phone).<br><br><br><br>Jonathan<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">
On 3/18/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Paul Choi</b> <<a href="mailto:asobihoudai@yahoo.com">asobihoudai@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I was under the misunderstanding that you couldn't get<br>the ephones to CFB to voicemail so I request you be a<br>little more detailed about your problem next time.<br><br>Thanks!<br><br>--- Jonathan Charles <<a href="mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com">
jonvoip@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>> Cisco is driving this a bit and they want to deploy<br>> CCME 4.1...<br>><br>> Here was the solution, BTW:<br>><br>> !<br>> ephone-dn 270 dual-line<br>> number 1455
<br>> preference 1<br>> corlist incoming call-internal<br>> huntstop channel<br>> no huntstop<br>> hold-alert 30 originator<br>> !<br>> !<br>> ephone-dn 271 dual-line<br>> number 1455<br>
> preference 2<br>> corlist incoming call-internal<br>> huntstop channel<br>> no huntstop<br>> hold-alert 30 originator<br>> !<br>> !<br>> ephone-dn 272 dual-line<br>> number 1455<br>> preference 3
<br>> corlist incoming call-internal<br>> huntstop channel<br>> no huntstop<br>> hold-alert 30 originator<br>> !<br>> !<br>> ephone-dn 273 dual-line<br>> number 1455<br>> preference 4<br>
> corlist incoming call-internal<br>> no huntstop<br>> hold-alert 30 originator<br>> !<br>> !<br>> ephone-dn 274 dual-line<br>> number 1455<br>> preference 5<br>> call-forward busy 1844<br>
> call-forward noan 1844 timeout 20<br>> corlist incoming call-internal<br>> huntstop channel<br>> hold-alert 30 originator<br>> !<br>><br>> And it works fine.<br>><br>> It ended up being a configuration error... the DN
<br>> was hunting to the next<br>> channel on the phone and then dying... you can't do<br>> the dual-line thing with<br>> a preference and have it work.<br>><br>><br>><br>> Jonathan<br>><br>
> On 3/17/07, Paul Choi <<a href="mailto:asobihoudai@yahoo.com">asobihoudai@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > I'm not using 12.4.11XJ but 12.9T2 instead. I have<br>> no<br>> > issues with CFB.
<br>> ><br>> > Is there any burning reason why you're using an XJ<br>> > release in the first place?<br>> ><br>> > --- Jonathan Charles <<a href="mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com">jonvoip@gmail.com
</a>> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > > Anyone run into this?<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > Jonathan<br>> > > ><br>> _______________________________________________
<br>> > > cisco-voip mailing list<br>> > > <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> > ><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>> > ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>><br>____________________________________________________________________________________
<br>> > We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love<br>> > (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures<br>> list.<br>> > <a href="http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265">http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
</a><br>> ><br>><br><br><br><br><br>____________________________________________________________________________________<br>Be a PS3 game guru.<br>Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
<br><a href="http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121">http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br></blockquote></div><br>