The WAN bandwidth usage would have to have been off the charts (8k of bandwidth is sufficient for a LOT of phones to maintain registration).<br><br>My guess is your WAN bounced, and did so for awhile (at least 30 seconds).
<br><br>BTW, you could see that the interface never went down, but you did lose your route back to CCM... this could have been a carrier bounce or even just a transient routing issue.<br><br>Actually, there are too many reasons to list here, suffice it to say that the phone lost its connection to CCM for a period.
<br><br><br><br>Jonathan<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/21/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">wong cf</b> <<a href="mailto:cericw.my@gmail.com">cericw.my@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi support<br><br>My user's IP phone 7960 is connected to CCM across the WAN link<br>He noticed that his phone reset by itself and may not have CM fallback then back to normal.<br><br>Anyone can tell me why? WAN link problem or high bandwidth usage?
<br><br>Thanks<br>Eric Wong<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>