<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3086" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>i just tried on ethernet and it accepted the
command.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>or at least tab completed it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>i was 'fraid to press enter. ;)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>Lelio
Fulgenzi, B.A.<BR>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1<BR>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
(JNHN)<BR>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<BR>"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo
buffalo." WJR<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=Scott.Voll@wesd.org href="mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org">Voll, Scott</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=jonvoip@gmail.com
href="mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com">Jonathan Charles</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">ciscovoip</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, June 05, 2007 6:29
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] Auto-QoS
?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Can you do it on an ATM
interface?<BR><BR>Scott<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Jonathan
Charles [mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com] <BR>Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:58
PM<BR>To: Voll, Scott<BR>Cc: ciscovoip<BR>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Auto-QoS
?<BR><BR>Oh, it also adds this:<BR><BR>rmon event 33333 log trap AutoQoS
description "AutoQoS SNMP traps for<BR>Voice Drop<BR>s" owner AutoQoS<BR>rmon
alarm 33333 cbQosCMDropBitRate.34.5364641 30 absolute<BR>rising-threshold 1
33<BR>333 falling-threshold 0 owner AutoQoS<BR><BR><BR>Jonathan<BR><BR>On
6/5/07, Jonathan Charles <<A
href="mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com">jonvoip@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> On
the Serial Interface:<BR>><BR>> auto qos voip trust<BR>><BR>> and
it adds this:<BR>><BR>> class-map match-any
AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust<BR>> match ip dscp ef<BR>> class-map
match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust<BR>> match ip dscp
cs3<BR>> match ip dscp af31<BR>><BR>> policy-map
AutoQoS-Policy-Trust<BR>> class
AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust<BR>> priority percent 70<BR>>
class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust<BR>> bandwidth percent
5<BR>> class class-default<BR>>
fair-queue<BR>><BR>> interface Serial0/0<BR>> auto qos voip
trust<BR>> service-policy output
AutoQoS-Policy-Trust<BR>><BR>><BR>> I don't like the percentages, I
prefer to nail in the bandwidth on the<BR>> priority and bandwidth commands
to match up with locations-based CAC.<BR>><BR>> Jonathan<BR>><BR>>
On 6/5/07, Voll, Scott <<A
href="mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org">Scott.Voll@wesd.org</A>> wrote:<BR>>
> You can setup Auto QoS on routers? What's the command?<BR>>
><BR>> > Scott<BR>> ><BR>> > -----Original
Message-----<BR>> > From: <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</A><BR>>
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan<BR>>
> Charles<BR>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:27 PM<BR>> >
To: Carter, Bill<BR>> > Cc: <A
href="mailto:cbomba@s4nets.com">cbomba@s4nets.com</A>; <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Auto-QoS ?<BR>> ><BR>> > OK, but
here's the question no one is answering...<BR>> ><BR>> > Saying
"Auto-QOS sucks" is all well and good, but first off, some of<BR>> > us
are not CCIEs... and also, have you ever actually experienced a<BR>> >
voice quality issue with the Auto-QOS on Cisco switches?<BR>> ><BR>>
> To be perfectly honest, I have come across so many
installations<BR>(some<BR>> > quite large) with NO layer-2 QOS that I
find it difficult to<BR>> > understand how it Auto-QOS could be a
problem.<BR>> ><BR>> > That being said, when the 3560s first came
out, Auto-QOS strangled<BR>> > non-priority traffic to about 4MB/sec on
a GigE switch... (since<BR>fixed<BR>> > by code updates)...<BR>>
><BR>> > All in all, I think AQ has matured to a point of being
perfectly<BR>> > acceptable for LAN Switching...<BR>> ><BR>>
> On the other hand, I didn't even realize Auto-QOS was available
for<BR>> > routers until recently (I was so comfortable with CBWFQ that
I never<BR>> > even looked into the automatic way), when I did finally
run into it,<BR>> > it just spews in the same config I would do by hand
anyway...<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > Jonathan<BR>>
><BR>> > On 6/5/07, Carter, Bill <<A
href="mailto:bcarter@sentinel.com">bcarter@sentinel.com</A>> wrote:<BR>>
> > AutoQoS on the switches still maps COS 3 to DSCP AF31(26),
when<BR>> > current<BR>> > > SRND and CM installations set call
control to DSCP CS3(24). I run<BR>> > > autoqos on the switches
then adjust the map.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > -----Original
Message-----<BR>> > > From: <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</A><BR>>
> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Jonathan<BR>> > > Charles<BR>> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 05,
2007 3:10 PM<BR>> > > To: Paul Choi<BR>> > > Cc: <A
href="mailto:cbomba@s4nets.com">cbomba@s4nets.com</A>; <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>>
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Auto-QoS ?<BR>> > ><BR>> >
> I would agree on the Router-side.. but for the switches, it is
far<BR>> > more<BR>> > > likely to have positive results than
the manual method...<BR>> > > especially without years of experience
configuring your queues...<BR>> > ><BR>> > > To be honest,
the auto-qos dumps config into the switch that is,<BR>A:<BR>> > >
Cisco TAC supported, B: Likely to work great and C: easy.<BR>> >
><BR>> > > Why wouldn't you use it? Unless you have a lot of SNA
traffic or<BR>> > > something...<BR>> > ><BR>> >
><BR>> > > Jonathan<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>>
> > On 6/5/07, Paul Choi <<A
href="mailto:asobihoudai@yahoo.com">asobihoudai@yahoo.com</A>>
wrote:<BR>> > > > Auto-QoS, better known as "QoS for idiots"
(like<BR>> > > > myself) is a cookie cutter approach to your
network. I think<BR>it's<BR>> > > > better not to use if you have
the knowhow to implement QoS<BR>yourself.<BR>> > > ><BR>> >
> > --- "Christopher M. Bomba" <<A
href="mailto:cbomba@s4nets.com">cbomba@s4nets.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> >
> ><BR>> > > > > I have implemented QoS on multiple voice
networks from 6500s<BR>to<BR>> > > > > 2950s. I have done
it always manually. The network I am<BR>working<BR>> > on<BR>>
> ><BR>> > > > > now is insisting on Auto-QoS. I
haven't done it before but<BR>only<BR>> > > > > heard horror
stories from it.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > What
are you thoughts on this? This is a very large network<BR>that<BR>>
> is<BR>> > ><BR>> > > > > going to have multiple
clusters and thousands of devices<BR>connected<BR>> > > > > to
the IPT network.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > >
Thanks,<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > Chris<BR>>
> > > ><BR>> > > > >
_______________________________________________<BR>> > > > >
cisco-voip mailing list<BR>> > > > > <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>>
> > > > <A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR>>
> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> >
> ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>>
><BR>______________________________________________________________________<BR>>
> > > ______________<BR>> > > > Be a PS3 game
guru.<BR>> > > > Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news
and previews at<BR>> > Yahoo!<BR>> > > Games.<BR>> > >
> <A
href="http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121">http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121</A><BR>>
> > > _______________________________________________<BR>> >
> > cisco-voip mailing list<BR>> > > > <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>>
> > > <A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR>>
> > ><BR>> > >
_______________________________________________<BR>> > > cisco-voip
mailing list<BR>> > > <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>>
> > <A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR>>
> ><BR>> > _______________________________________________<BR>>
> cisco-voip mailing list<BR>> > <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>>
> <A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR>>
><BR>><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>