<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>That's what I thought. For some reason the DA is being done on
the server where the gateway is registered, not my phone.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>Lelio
Fulgenzi, B.A.<BR>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1<BR>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
(JNHN)<BR>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<BR>"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo
buffalo." WJR<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=rratliff@cisco.com href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">Ryan Ratliff</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=lelio@uoguelph.ca
href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">Lelio Fulgenzi</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5:20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] missing trace
information in trace files</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>It shows up on the node that process DA for the call. If
it's an <BR>inbound MGCP call then DA is processed on the node where the
endpoint <BR>is registered. If it's from a phone it gets processed
on the node <BR>where the phone is registered. You can have
some funkiness with CTI <BR>devices where your CTI provider isn't the
primary in the CTI device's <BR>CM group, but otherwise it's pretty
straight forward. I don't think <BR>it gets funky even with shared
lines across nodes.<BR><BR>-Ryan<BR><BR>On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Lelio
Fulgenzi wrote:<BR><BR>wow....why is it on the server the MGCP is registered
to? I would <BR>have though it would have been on the one my phone is
registered
too.<BR><BR>------------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>--------<BR>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<BR>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of
Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<BR>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
(JNHN)<BR>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<BR>"Buffalo
buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo
<BR>buffalo." WJR<BR>----- Original Message
-----<BR>From: Lelio Fulgenzi<BR>To: Ryan Ratliff<BR>Cc: <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>Sent:
Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5:07 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] missing trace
information in trace files<BR><BR>Yup - I'm looking on the server where my
phone is registered for <BR>sure. Checked it again. And again during
this message. ;)<BR><BR>Do you think that summary will appear on the
subscriber on which the <BR>MGCP gateways are registered? I'll check
there.....<BR><BR>------------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>--------<BR>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<BR>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of
Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<BR>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
(JNHN)<BR>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<BR>"Buffalo
buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo
<BR>buffalo." WJR<BR>----- Original Message
-----<BR>From: Ryan Ratliff<BR>To: Lelio Fulgenzi<BR>Cc: <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>Sent:
Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5:04 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] missing trace
information in trace files<BR><BR>Are you sure you're looking at the server
where the phones are<BR>registered? That tracing comes from DA
(digit analysis) and that<BR>will only occur where the device is
registered. If you only see it<BR>for incoming calls it sounds
like your MGCP gateway(s) are not<BR>registered to the same server your phones
are.<BR><BR>-Ryan<BR><BR>On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi
wrote:<BR><BR>This is really wierd since I don't even see the PSS in some
calls
any<BR>more.<BR><BR><BR>------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>--------<BR>Lelio
Fulgenzi, B.A.<BR>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph,
Ontario N1G 2W1<BR>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
(JNHN)<BR>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<BR>"Buffalo
buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo
Buffalo<BR>buffalo." WJR<BR>----- Original
Message -----<BR>From: Lelio Fulgenzi<BR>To: <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR>Sent:
Wednesday, June 13, 2007 4:36 PM<BR>Subject: [cisco-voip] missing trace
information in trace files<BR><BR>I used to be able to see a nice summary in
the trace files which<BR>showed which route pattern a call hit. I don't seem
to be getting<BR>that information anymore. Something like this. But now it's
only for<BR>incoming
calls.<BR>|CallingPartyNumber=38003<BR>|DialingPartition=UoGSysDN_G31_PT<BR>|DialingPattern=37023<BR>|FullyQualifiedCalledPartyNumber=37023<BR>|DialingRoutePatternRegularExpression=(37023)<BR>|DialingWhere=<BR>|PatternType=Enterprise<BR>|PotentialMatches=NoPotentialMatchesExist<BR>|DialingSdlProcessId=(0,0,0)<BR>|PretransformDigitString=37023<BR>|PretransformTagsList=SUBSCRIBER<BR>|PretransformPositionalMatchList=37023<BR>|CollectedDigits=37023<BR>|UnconsumedDigits=<BR>|TagsList=SUBSCRIBER<BR>|PositionalMatchList=37023<BR>|VoiceMailbox=<BR>|VoiceMailCallingSearchSpace=<BR>|VoiceMailCallingSearchSpace=<BR>|VoiceMailPilotNumber=<BR>|AlertingName=<BR>|RouteBlockFlag=RouteThisPattern<BR>|RouteBlockCause=0<BR>|InterceptPartition=UoGSysDN_G31_PT<BR>|InterceptPattern=37023<BR>|InterceptWhere=<BR>|InterceptSdlProcessId=(9,35,1)<BR>|InterceptSsType=150994948<BR>|InterceptSsKey=565<BR>|OverlapSendingFlagEnabled=0<BR>|WithTags=<BR><BR>Anyone
have any ideas? Did a recent upgrade change this? Grrrr.<BR><BR>I have
detailed traces set on the active subscriber of my phone. I<BR>have all
settings checked except:<BR>Enable H245 Message Trace<BR>Enable All GateWay
Trace<BR>Enable SIP Stack Trace<BR>Enable SIP Call Processing Trace<BR>Enable
Keep Alive Trace<BR>Device Name Based Trace
Monitoring<BR>------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>--------<BR>Lelio
Fulgenzi, B.A.<BR>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph,
Ontario N1G 2W1<BR>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
(JNHN)<BR>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<BR>"Buffalo
buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo
Buffalo<BR>buffalo."
WJR<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A><BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>