The only upgrade for 5.0.4 is to 5.1.1 or 5.1.2. <br><br>Take Ryan's advice and upgrade. You are running a dotzero release of software, you should expect some level of bugs in this code. Most of which are now fixed in the newer
5.x releases.<br><br>Justin<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/3/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Anthony Kouloglou</b> <<a href="mailto:akoul@dataways.gr">akoul@dataways.gr</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br>i cannot find anywhere in cisco 5.0(4.2117.1).<br>Does, anyone knows why there are no upgrades for 5.0(4)?<br>Does the customer needs to buy an upgrade to 5.1?<br><br>Thanks<br>Anthony<br><br>Ryan Ratliff wrote:<br>
> No, you can either remove one of the servers from the CM list or stay<br>> below the limit described until you upgrade.<br>><br>> In case you didn't look the bug up on the web:<br>> Symptom:<br>> When adding 15 BLF(BusyLampField), you will get registration rejected
<br>> on 7970<br>><br>> Conditions:<br>> CallManager 5.0(4), 3 CallManager cluster<br>><br>> Workaround:<br>> Use 14 BLF.<br>><br>> Further Problem Description:<br>> StationMaxButtonTemplateSize is set to 42. The BlfArray is bounded to
<br>> that limit. The problem here is if the phone is assigned to a<br>> CallManagerGroup that contains 3 CallManager, then 14 Blf entries will<br>> return 14 * 3 = 42 entries in busylampfield query.<br>> So limitation is like so.
<br>> Only two CCM, you can add up to 21 blf. 2 * 21=42<br>> Only one CCM, you can add 35 3*14=42<br>> the max button we can have from our IP phone is 7970 + 2 side car = 36<br>> button. The first line must be line, then 36 -1 = 35 BLF max.
<br>> For single CCM, the limit is no longer 42 as phone button template can<br>> onyl support up to 36.<br>><br>> -Ryan<br>><br>> On May 3, 2007, at 1:54 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:<br>><br>> Thanks Ryan,
<br>> so there is no way overcoming the problem by editing a parameter or<br>> something like this?<br>> I have a cluster of 2 CCMs each running 5.0.4.2000-1<br>><br>> Cheers,<br>> Anthony<br>><br>>
<br>> Ryan Ratliff wrote:<br>>> Sounds like CSCsg12278 - BLF,StationMaxButtonTemplateSize is reached,<br>>> user gets registration rej.<br>>><br>>> Looks like the limit is determined by the number of CMs in your CM
<br>>> group.<br>>><br>>> Fixed in 5.1(1b) and a 5.0(4)ES but you should be running 5.1.1 anyway.<br>>><br>>> -Ryan<br>>><br>>> On May 2, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
<br>>><br>>> Busy Lamp Fields,<br>>> they monitor a line state of another extension and they are also<br>>> speed dials.<br>>> I have noticed that i can use only 21 BLFs!!<br>>> When i configure the 22nd, i get registration rejected!
<br>>> When i erase one of the 22 BLFS (on the device, 1st 7914 or 2nd 7914)<br>>> it gets registered again!!<br>>> Here is what i got from debugging:<br>>><br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:10.975 CCM|Processing StationReg. regCount: 1
<br>>> DeviceName=SEP001B0CDB3376, TCPPid = [1.100.7.13678],<br>>> IPAddr=<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>, Port=50293, Device<br>>> Controller=[1,60,5904]|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::
<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State<br>>> Transition><MASK::0020>
<br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:10.975 CCM|StationD: (0005904)<br>>> wait_register_StationRegister - Check MAC address & protocolVer<br>>> (mac=,<br>>> protocolVer=-2056257527)|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::
<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800><br>>>
<br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.035 CCM|ProcessDb - ERROR<br>>> readStationRegistrationProfileByDeviceName -<br>>> readStationTspByDeviceName<br>>> failed|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::<a href="http://192.168.101.5">
192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Error><MASK::0800><br>>><br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:
11.035 CCM|TspError - Error in TSP. Port<br>>> IsoEthPort:0 Port DSL:0 Name of Device:SEP001B0CDB3376 App ID:Cisco<br>>> CallManager Cluster ID:StandAloneCluster Node<br>>> ID:ufbccm|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::
<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::AlarmSEP001B0CDB3376><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::All><MASK::ffff><br>>><br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.035 CCM|StationD: (0005904) Error,
<br>>> registrationProfile_discovery_DbStationRegistrationProfileErr|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">
192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Error><MASK::0800><br>>><br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.035 CCM|StationD: (0005904) RegisterReject<br>>> text='Error: DB<br>>> Config'.|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::
<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State<br>>> Transition><MASK::0020>
<br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.076 CCM|StationInit: (0005904) alarmSeverity=2<br>>> text="24: Name=SEP001B0CDB3376 Load= SCCP41.8-2-2SR1S<br>>> Last=Phone-Reg-Rej" parm1=0(0)<br>>> parm2=0(0).|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::
<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905172><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State<br>>> Transition><MASK::0020>
<br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.173 CCM|StationInit: TCPPid =<br>>> [1.100.7.13678]Socket Broken.<br>>> DeviceName=SEP001B0CDB3376,IPAddr=<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>, Port=0xc475,<br>
>> Device<br>>> Controller=[1,60,5904]|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150
</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Error><MASK::0800><br>>><br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.173 CCM|Closing Station connection<br>>> DeviceName=SEP001B0CDB3376, TCPPid = [1.100.7.13678],<br>
>> IPAddr=<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>, Port=50293, Device<br>>> Controller=[1,60,5904]|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,
1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State<br>>> Transition><MASK::0020><br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.174 CCM|DeviceManager:star_DeviceStop
<br>>> Name=SEP001B0CDB3376 Key=<br>>> RegisterDevice=81|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">
192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Detailed><MASK::ffffff><br>>><br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.174 CCM|DeviceManager:star_DeviceStop Device =<br>>> SEP001B0CDB3376 not found in the table.
<br>>> RegisterDevice=81|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::<a href="http://192.168.101.5">192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Error><MASK::ffffff>
<br>>><br>>> 05/02/2007 16:59:13.039 CCM|StationInit: TCPPid = [1.100.7.13678]<br>>> StationCloseReq received:<br>>> output|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::<a href="http://192.168.101.5">
192.168.101.5</a>><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::<a href="http://192.168.101.150">192.168.101.150</a>><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State<br>>> Transition><MASK::0800><br>>><br>>>
<br>>><br>>> Paul Choi wrote:<br>>>> Sorry for my density...what are BLFs? Paul --- Anthony Kouloglou<br>>>> <<a href="mailto:akoul@dataways.gr">akoul@dataways.gr</a>> wrote: --------------------------------- Hi, i
<br>>>> have a 7961G running SCCP41.8-2-2SR1S on a ccm 5.0(4) The phone has<br>>>> also 2 expansion modules 7914 (5.0.2) The phone has only one line<br>>>> and all the rest are BLF SD (5 from thephone + 2x14 from modules) I
<br>>>> have used 5 first BLFs from the phone, 14 BLFs from the first<br>>>> 7914and 2 from the second. When i try to add more extensions on the<br>>>> rest BLFs of the second7914 the phones gets unregistered and
<br>>>> displays "Registration Rejected..." Is it some kind of cisco bug?<br>>>>> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing<br>>>>> list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>>>>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>>>> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!?
<br>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around<br>>>> <a href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> cisco-voip mailing list
<br>>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
>><br>><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br></blockquote></div><br>