<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY><!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT size=2>Be careful with the UC500's<BR><BR>- NO Routing protocol
support: i.e. even no RIP<BR><BR>I have confirmed that the UC520W and UC500
Series feature set supports all of the voice, video, data, security, and
wireless features with <STRONG>the following exceptions:</STRONG><BR><BR>For
Voice – MGCP / CCM / SRST<BR><BR>For Data – WAN Protocols such as FR / ATM /
X.25 / MPLS / Tag / LAPB<BR><BR>For Security – L2TP<BR><BR><STRONG>For Routing –
Routing Protocols</STRONG><BR><BR>For Network Management – SNMP
Proxy<BR><BR>Other – GLBP (load balancing)<BR><BR>Dynamic IP routing(BGP etc..),
CCM/MGCP/SRST support have been removed from these images. Static IP routing is
still supported. All other data support exists in this image.<BR><BR>The UC500
series code is based on IOS 12.4 Advanced Service feature set, however some of
the above features has been stripped off including dynamic routing. There is a
internal bug CSCsh45692 raised to have the dynamic routing
removed.<BR><BR></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Also the configuration Application is based around North
America. I recommend just using the UC500 like CME / CUE, much
easier.</FONT></P>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </DIV>
<P><BR><BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [<A
href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</A>]
On Behalf Of Paul Choi<BR>Sent: Friday, 17 August 2007 12:53 PM<BR>To: Curt
Shaffer; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC500<BR><BR><A
href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7293/index.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7293/index.html</A><BR><BR>Here
it says it supports up to 50 users.<BR><BR>Paul<BR><BR>--- Curt Shaffer
<cshaffer@gmail.com> wrote:<BR><BR>> I can't find a user limit for this
device. I see mention of 16 users<BR>> but it doesn't say limited to 16
users. Anyone have insight on this?<BR>> Also is anyone aware of redundancy
options for this?<BR>><BR>> <BR>><BR>> Thanks!<BR>><BR>>
> _______________________________________________<BR>> cisco-voip mailing
list<BR>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>> <A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR><BR><BR><BR> <BR>____________________________________________________________________________________<BR>Boardwalk
for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's
economy) at Yahoo! Games.<BR><A
href="http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow">http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow</A><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip
mailing list<BR>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR></P></FONT></BODY></HTML>