<div>4.2, 4.3, 4.4, etc are the train of OS (major upgrade) the SR1, sr2, sr3b is the minor upgrade.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>you will need to read the readme to make sure all hardware is supported but you should be able to use the newest windows 2000 major (major upgrade 2-3 reboots) and then install the minor on all your CM, IPCCx, CER, etc. (single reboot) (YMMV)
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>win 2003 is just for CM 4.3 as that runs on win2k3.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Hope that clears things up. (READ THE READMEs) ;-)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Scott<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/23/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Dark Fiber</b> <<a href="mailto:d4rkf1ber@gmail.com">d4rkf1ber@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>I have two callmanagers (publisher and subscriber) that are both running the following OS:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>2000.4.2sr16</div>
<div> </div>
<div>And the CallManager version is 4.1(3)sr4d</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I also have two IPCC Express Premium servers running OS:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>2000.4.3aSR4</div>
<div> </div>
<div>And IPCC version 4.0(5)_Build042</div>
<div> </div>
<div>When I go to look for OS upgrades on the Cisco site I see version numbers that are all over the place.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>2000.4.4a sr10 (Aug. 21 2007)</div>
<div>2000.4.5a sr2 (Aug. 21 2007)</div>
<div>2003.1.1 sr7 (Aug. 21 2007)</div>
<div>2003.1.2a sr2 (Aug. 21 2007)</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I recognize that two of them are for Windows Server 2000 and two of them are for Windows Server 2003.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I assume if I want / have to stay with 2000 for now I would have to choose from either:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>2000.4.4a sr10 (Aug. 21 2007)</div>
<div>2000.4.5a sr2 (Aug. 21 2007)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>From the version numbers you would think one is more up to date then the other since .5 is higher then .4, but since the dates are the same it would seem that they are both equal in terms of being "up to date".
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Anyone want to shed some light on this? I have to admit I am being lazy, and honestly don't want to have to read through 4 different readme's to understand the pro's and con's of them all.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I want to get things up to date and secure, but I am also trying to avoid any sort of major upgrade right now. I would love to have one consistent OS across the four servers if possible but I suppose there are alot of other factors that will come into play.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Anyone have any thoughts regarding this? Becoming quite the pain to keep track of the various versions, and now I have to bring in a couple of CER servers too so I am trying to get a handle on all of this before I begin.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks!</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br></blockquote></div><br>