<div>We have a combanation of 877, ASA5505, and more recently and will continue forward, Cisco's Phone Proxy. No VPN neccessary!! But the nice part about the ASA is that it has two PoE ports. but I'm not much for troubleshooting VPN Lan2Lan connections so the Phone proxy is nice. I guess it's all personal preference. Remimber to put a sticker on the phones not to dial 911 or have CER that can take care of it.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Scott<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/15/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Curt Shaffer</b> <<a href="mailto:cshaffer@gmail.com">cshaffer@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div lang="EN-US" vlink="purple" link="blue">
<div>
<p>I was wondering want everyone out there is using for the situation where you have someone on your CCM or CCME that has 1 phone at a home office. Something tells me an ASA is overkill and I haven't found solid information that any of the 87x routers support tagging QoS of packets going through the VPN tunnel. We would obviously like to have QoS in place even though it's not respected at their ISP just to make sure the VPN/Voice packets are leaving their routers first as a best effort to get some quality.
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br></blockquote></div><br>