<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>CallManager 4.x (vs.) 6.x</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1589" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText63051 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>In Windows you have root access, which I really miss. Watching tac try to type a long SQL select statement from a command line is pretty funny as it usually takes several tries to get it right. I'd rather have log files in \var\logs then in RTMT. Trying to edit text files like RingList.xml takes more steps.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>I was more concerned that Cisco kept shipping Windows 2000/SQL 2000 so long after Microsoft stopped supporting them and put it on extended maintenance. Cisco is going to have a lot of old Windows 2000 boxes for years to come. It was liking buying a new PC in 2007and getting Windows 95.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Nothing wrong with 5.x/6.x, they have some great features but I do wish Cisco could release the same version numbers in Linix\Windows 2003 at the same time.</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf of Leetun, Rob<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tue 10/30/2007 11:46 AM<BR><B>To:</B> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> [cisco-voip] CallManager 4.x (vs.) 6.x<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P dir=ltr><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hello all,</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us></SPAN></P>
<P dir=ltr><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face=Arial size=2>We</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us> <FONT face=Arial size=2>are having</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us> <FONT face=Arial size=2>a discussion about why is a Windows platform better than a Linux platform when it comes to CallManager</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face=Arial size=2>, or is Linux better than Windows? In your opinions, is it better to go</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us> <FONT face=Arial size=2>from 4.x</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us> <FONT face=Arial size=2>to 6.x or wait for 7.x to roll out next summer?</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face=Arial size=2> Or is</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us> <FONT face=Arial size=2>it</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us> <FONT face=Arial size=2>better to stay on the</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us> <FONT face=Arial size=2>4.x train? How many of you have switched to the Linux</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us> <FONT face=Arial size=2>platform</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face=Arial size=2> from the Windows platform?</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us></SPAN></P>
<P dir=ltr><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks in advance.</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P dir=ltr><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face=Arial size=2>Rob</FONT></SPAN><SPAN lang=en-us></SPAN></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>
<HTML><BODY><P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG>
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
</STRONG></P></BODY></HTML>