<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
..shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<title>Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r vs.
Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator</title>
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Consolas;
        panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0in;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
pre
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
        {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
        font-family:Consolas;}
span.EmailStyle20
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
..MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I use Skype which uses iLBC (Internet Low Bandwidth Codec), I
suspect the 79xx phones will eventually get it?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>It’s amazing how a Skype calls sounds great, yet a IP Communicator
call has issues. From my research it’s the iLBC tolerates packet loss better.
Typically I’m in a hotel and will use Skype over IP Communicator for calls.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Miller, Steve<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, November 03, 2007 2:55 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Carter, Bill; Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
route+7970 r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div id=idOWAReplyText4303>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black'>What is the latest IP Communicator version? Has anything
changed in the past 15 months? Thanks.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on
behalf of Carter, Bill<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Fri 11/2/2007 11:06 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
route+7970 r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>The latest
version of IP communicator really improves call quality.<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net<br>
[<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>]
On Behalf Of Robert<br>
Kulagowski<br>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 3:54 PM<br>
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r<br>
vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator<br>
<br>
Any thoughts on the relative merits of the above combinations? We<br>
currently deploy the VPN client + IP Communicator for home users, but<br>
there are complaints of call quality issues (we use CM 4.1.3sr5 and<br>
g.729). Since we can't switch to iLBC we're looking at alternatives.<br>
<br>
From what I can gather, the PhoneProxy would still encrypt all traffic<br>
over the Internet (control and voice), correct?<br>
<br>
Is it any more "efficient", packet-wise or whatever, than a
full-blown<br>
VPN tunnel configuration that you'd get with a 871?<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<pre>--------------------------------------------------------<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>named above. This communication may contain material <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>protected by attorney-client, work product, or other <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>responsible for delivering this confidential communication <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>to the intended recipient, you have received this <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination, <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>any communication that is created, received, or sent on its <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>network. If you have received this confidential <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>communication in error, please notify the sender <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>the original message. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre>To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>to postmaster@dicksteinshapiro.com<o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre>Dickstein Shapiro LLP<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com<o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre>==============================================================================<o:p></o:p></pre></div>
</body>
</html>
<HTML><BODY><P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG>
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
</STRONG></P></BODY></HTML>