<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3199" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText4303 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>What is the latest IP Communicator version? Has anything changed in the past 15 months? Thanks.</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf of Carter, Bill<BR><B>Sent:</B> Fri 11/2/2007 11:06 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>The latest version of IP communicator really improves call quality.<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net<BR>[<A href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</A>] On Behalf Of Robert<BR>Kulagowski<BR>Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 3:54 PM<BR>To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r<BR>vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator<BR><BR>Any thoughts on the relative merits of the above combinations? We<BR>currently deploy the VPN client + IP Communicator for home users, but<BR>there are complaints of call quality issues (we use CM 4.1.3sr5 and<BR>g.729). Since we can't switch to iLBC we're looking at alternatives.<BR><BR> From what I can gather, the PhoneProxy would still encrypt all traffic<BR>over the Internet (control and voice), correct?<BR><BR>Is it any more "efficient", packet-wise or whatever, than a full-blown<BR>VPN tunnel configuration that you'd get with a 871?<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip mailing list<BR>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><A href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip mailing list<BR>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><A href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR><BR></FONT></P></DIV>
<P><pre wrap>--------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential
and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)
named above. This communication may contain material
protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person
responsible for delivering this confidential communication
to the intended recipient, you have received this
communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination,
forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of
this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly
prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor
any communication that is created, received, or sent on its
network. If you have received this confidential
communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete
the original message.
To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email
to postmaster@dicksteinshapiro.com
Dickstein Shapiro LLP
http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com
==============================================================================
</pre></P></BODY></HTML>