<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3199" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=270434516-27112007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>The later versions are not tested by Cisco at this time, or
the release of MCS OS being installed is not current. Cisco provides the warning
to let you know that you are not running the "tested" version for the the MCS OS
that is being installed. Newer is not always better.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=270434516-27112007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=270434516-27112007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Mike</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <B>On Behalf Of </B>STEVEN
CASPER<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:43 AM<BR><B>To:</B> cisco
voip<BR><B>Subject:</B> [cisco-voip] Bios and Raid firmware
warnings<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> I am installing some new HP DL380 G5 servers and when running the OS
2000.4.4. Installation and Recovery disk it is complaining that my bios is
P56-12.28/2006 but the bios tested is P56-07/13/2006 and that my Raid firmware
is 2.08 but 1.18 is the tested version. I can get past the warnings and the OS
installs fine. I am thinking later versions are better but you never know. Any
thoughts?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,<BR><BR>Steve Casper<BR>Voice Technologies<BR>M&T Bank<BR>(410)
347-6026<BR><BR>>>> "Jason Burns" <jasburns@cisco.com> 11/27/2007
10:28 AM >>><BR>"High Traffic, Try Again Later" means the server has
experienced a Code <BR>Yellow alert.<BR><BR>For some reason the CallManager was
experiencing delay (high CPU, low <BR>memory, high HD activity) and wasn't
getting enough system resources to <BR>process the number of incoming signals
for Call Processing.<BR><BR>Check utilization (call volume / CDR) and check
perfmon logs on that server.<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR>Jason Burns<BR>Cisco Voice
Solutions<BR>919.392.5713<BR><BR>On 11/26/2007 11:38 PM, Jonathan Charles
wrote:<BR>> Someone customized the message that should have said,
'Insufficient Bandwidth'<BR>> <BR>> This is occurring on a site-to-site
call and you have exceeded the<BR>> locations-based CAC.<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> Jonathan<BR>> <BR>> On Nov 26, 2007 7:16 PM, Cucumber
Green <greencucumber2007@yahoo.com> wrote:<BR>>> On one of our Call
Manager clusters (4.2(3)sr2), phones show the message<BR>>> "High
Traffic Try Again Later" and the user can not place a
call.<BR>>><BR>>> I have tried looking up this error message without
any luck. :(<BR>>><BR>>> Has anyone come across
this?<BR>>><BR>>> P.D. This cluster serves a CRS server. There are
only 7940 phones.<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
________________________________<BR>>> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your
homepage.<BR>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>> cisco-voip mailing
list<BR>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>>> <A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco</A>-voip<BR>>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> cisco-voip mailing
list<BR>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>> <A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco</A>-voip<BR>>
<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip mailing
list<BR>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><A
href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco</A>-voip<BR><BR><BR></DIV>
<P>************************************<BR>This email may contain privileged
and/or confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the
addressee. If you are not the intended recipient or entity, you are strictly
prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the
information contained in the transmission. If you received this communication in
error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its
entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may contain
nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of
the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not directly or
indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other than to
provide the services for which you are receiving the information.<BR>There are
risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The sender of this
information does not control the method of transmittal or service providers and
assumes no duty or obligation for the security, receipt, or third party
interception of this
transmission.<BR>************************************<BR></P></BODY></HTML>