<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Thinking about this more, I do want VM information in my call
accounting reporting. But I also want the option to filter these
extensions out so that I can get meaningful non-VM voice traffic
reporting. I will pursue this more with the call accounting software
provider. Thanks for the clarification, everyone.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Joel Hames</span><span style='color:#1F497D'> <br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Senior Director, Information Technology</span><span
style='color:#1F497D'> <br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Tamalpais Union High School District</span><span
style='color:#1F497D'> <br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>jhames@tamdistrict.org</span><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Scott Voll
[mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:57 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Hames, Joel<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Wes Sisk; Cisco VoIP<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Excluding extensions from CDR reporting<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>if your using CER then 911 should not be an issue as it
takes all the 911 calls and you don't really have a 911 or 9.911 route pattern.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>on the other note. Are you sure you don't want the VM
data. people from outside still get VM if no one is there and there for I
would see this as needed info.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>What are you doing with the reporting software that you
don't what VM?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Scott<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>On Dec 27, 2007 10:41 AM, Hames, Joel <<a
href="mailto:jhames@tamdistrict.org">jhames@tamdistrict.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Thanks for the clarification and I apologize for the
vagueness of the<br>
example. We are seeing both calls to our voicemail extension (2000) and <br>
to the MWI extensions (2090 and 2091). We recently disabled reporting<br>
for zero duration calls, but your point is well taken regarding 911<br>
hangups. I'll check with our implementer to see if our Emergency<br>
Responder installation will help offset this loss of detail. As for the<br>
voicemail extension itself (2000) that is logging all calls transferred<br>
to VM, I'll work with RSI again to see what they can do to help filter <br>
out this information for reporting.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>
Joel Hames<br>
Senior Director, Information Technology<br>
Tamalpais Union High School District<br>
<a href="mailto:jhames@tamdistrict.org">jhames@tamdistrict.org</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Wes Sisk [mailto:<a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:32 AM<br>
To: Hames, Joel<br>
Cc: Cisco VoIP<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Excluding extensions from CDR reporting <br>
<br>
The verbiage provided is vague but i'm going to assume that CDR's for<br>
MWI calls are the crux of the issue. Those have been an issue before<br>
and are certainly numerous enough to skew reporting.<br>
<br>
The way CM is implemented Voicemail and the associated MWI transactions<br>
are calls. You can set CM service parameter "CDR log calls with zero<br>
duration" to false so that CM does not record CDR for MWI. However,
you <br>
<br>
risk losing CDR for other critical calls such as misdials/hangups to 911<br>
<br>
where the caller hangs up before 911 service answers. Most 911<br>
districts consider these prank calls with a quota and begin charging. <br>
<br>
Otherwise, no, there is no way to filter these calls from CDR. The<br>
system dumps out CDR's of all calls. Parsing, filtering, and<br>
correlating are the job of the "Call Accounting and Reporting"
package. <br>
<br>
Just as Cisco generates the CDR flat files, RSI has to parse and import<br>
every CDR flat file. They have equal opportunity to filter these<br>
requests. As a bonus, RSI can do it without contending for<br>
CPU/Memory/DiskIO that would otherwise be used for processing your <br>
actual calls. It's a rather classic example of production vs.<br>
reporting.<br>
<br>
/Wes<br>
<br>
Hames, Joel wrote:<br>
> We have a new CCM5.1 installation, so I may ask a few basic questions<br>
as<br>
> we work through our first deployment. At the moment, we have <br>
> implemented RSI's Call Accounting system and have noticed that our<br>
> voicemail extension skews all of our reports significantly. RSI<br>
claims<br>
> that this is a Cisco configuration issue and that calls to that <br>
> extension should not be passed to the call accounting system. Our<br>
> installer claims that there is no way to filter out reporting to<br>
certain<br>
> extensions.<br>
><br>
> Does anyone have experience with this? While we can certainly ignore <br>
the<br>
> reports of calls inbound and outbound to that extension, I'd like to<br>
> clean this up as much as possible. The graphs of call lengths and<br>
call<br>
> costs would be much more meaningful without extraneous information <br>
like<br>
> this.<br>
><br>
> Thank you,<br>
><br>
> Joel Hames<br>
> Senior Director, Information Technology<br>
> Tamalpais Union High School District<br>
> <a href="mailto:jhames@tamdistrict.org">jhames@tamdistrict.org </a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip"
target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>