<div>since your running the 6608 you must have Cat 65xx boxes. why are you looking at 3845s rather then the CMM blade? your port density and conferencing is awesome. The thing has just works for us.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Scott<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 25, 2008 9:05 AM, Wes Sisk <<a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">that is a mixed bag. IF you got the 6608 to work (registration, c6k backplane issues, echo) then it was set it and forget it. However, there was terrible serviceability to help get it working or figure out why it broke.<br>
<br>On the sentimental road, I always had a soft spot for the dt-24+. True, it could be a bit fickle about getting a DHCP address occasionally, but otherwise it was the first Cisco product to offer 24 or 32 msec ecan, well before it was available in 6608 or IOS. It was also TRIVIAL to configure. Back in the day it was heresy to recommend a PC board over a Cisco box, but it worked when IOS/6608 folks could not fathom why anyone would truly need more that 16msec of ecan coverage.<br>
<br>/Wes<br><br>Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c">
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">many, we got spoiled with the 6608.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">those things were great</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">8 ports which can be used for T1 or Conferencing or Transcoding and conferences could be up to 32 participant. and the ports could be registered to different clusters.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">now we're looking at replacing them with 3845s, what a let down.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">max 8 conference participants, and if your using MGCP (long live MGCP!), you can only register ports to one cluster.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">anyone else miss the 6608?</font></div>
<div> </div></div></div><pre><hr width="90%" size="4">
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a>
</pre></blockquote></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>