The battle continues. I was able to replace the moboard tonight, and now the bios and the cucm setup both say 3400, but the hardware validation process in the 6.1 install still doesn't like something about the cpu. I've tried with hyper threading enabled and disabled. <br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Ryan Ratliff <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">You need to have IBM replace the motherboard. Apparently there was an issue with a small number of those servers that reported the CPU incorrectly. I found another TAC SR with the same issue.
<div><br></div>
<div>So open a TAC SR and shoot me the number and I'll put a note in there.</div>
<div><br><font color="#888888">
<div>
<p style="MARGIN: 0px"><font style="FONT: 12px Helvetica" face="Helvetica" size="3">-Ryan</font></p></div></font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<div>
<div>On Mar 10, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Nick Griffin wrote:</div><br>Actually I just discovered the hardware validation log show's that it's picking the cpu up as 1.4Ghz, which oddly enough is what it displays in the bios under system information. /proc/cpuinfo shows 6.0Ghz (HT)? It is actually at 3.4 Ghz. I've got a bios update downloaded from IBM, but I don't want to install it and risk stability with cucm 6.1. Do you have any bios version information for IBM servers as it relates to CUCM 6.1? Thanks in advance. <br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Ryan Ratliff <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com" target="_blank">rratliff@cisco.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">There's only the one 6.1 disk that I can see for both HP and IBM servers. According to <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/prod_brochure0900aecd8062a4f9.html" target="_blank">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/prod_brochure0900aecd8062a4f9.html</a> the 7825-I1-IPC1 is supported with 6.1.
<div><br></div>
<div>Do you get a specific error message regarding clock speed, etc?</div>
<div><br><font color="#888888">
<div>
<div style="MARGIN: 0px"><font style="FONT: 12px Helvetica" face="Helvetica" size="3">-Ryan</font></div></div></font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On Mar 10, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Nick Griffin wrote:</div><br>Yeah, I've tried the disc a few times. There's something about the hardware the installer doesn't like, or I don't have the correct installer for a IBM 7825. <br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Charles <<a href="mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com" target="_blank">jonvoip@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">The CCM 6.1 disc does not specify HP on it, so I am guessing the IBM<br>one is the same....<br><br>To be honest, I don't think it matters, worst case, just try the disc,<br>
if your system is not compatible, i am sure it will tell you... from<br>the specs you gave, it should be fine.<br><br><br>Jonathan<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div><br>On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Nick Griffin<br><<a href="mailto:nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com" target="_blank">nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> I've finally managed to get the DMA data, now the next hurdle, I'm getting<br>
> unsupported media. When using the PUT to order the CUCM 4.2 to 6.1 upgrade<br>> does anyone know if you receive a different CUCM 6.1 system disc for IBM<br>> versus HP? I'm trying to get a head start on the upgrade, I'm utilizing<br>
> media that may have been ordered against a HP server, while I wait for my<br>> PUT order to arrive. The server is 7825-I1-IPC1, it's got the dual 74GB<br>> drives, 2 gig memory and a 3.4Ghz. I'm thinking this is a media issue, ie<br>
> seperate discs for hp vs ibm. Thoughts appreciated.<br></div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br>><br></blockquote></div><br>
<div style="MARGIN: 0px">_______________________________________________</div>
<div style="MARGIN: 0px">cisco-voip mailing list</div>
<div style="MARGIN: 0px"><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></div>
<div style="MARGIN: 0px"><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></div></div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>