<div>Good Point, Resolution Details. Thanks to Ryan R for discovering the known MB issue:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>CUCM 6.1 Upgrade issues</div>
<div>So apparently there was a small number of IBM 7825 servers that had an issue with the motherboard displaying the wrong CPU speed, in my case 1.4 versus 3.4 Ghz. This causes some issues with the 6.X installation media and hardware validation checks. Just for reference the cucm 6.x installation media creates a /tmp/ folder that contains some files that contain some valuable logging information. Personally I prefer to received a little more information other than just "hardware not supported". In this folder /tmp is a fi le called "/tmp/hw_validiation_err" that will actually give you a bit more information, in my case, unsupported clock speed.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The fix for this is to receive a new motherboard from IBM but I found this also created some more issues. Apparently the Cisco installation script does some additional checks that still fall under the "Clock speed" entry in the log file, these two parameters are set via the bios. The entries are "Machine Type Model" this must be a supported model, and then and "Asset ID" that should be set to "CiscoSystemsServer". I remembered seeing this in a desparate attempt to resolve my upgrade issues by flashing the bios. After I implemented these settings via a firmware update I was then able to get past the hw validation check. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>This wasn't the end, was what appeared to be a SATA raid issue. Last response from Cisco is that they think for some reason the utility is having issues deleting the old partitions. I had to actually manually reformat the drives by hand, the installation cdrom was not able to do this for whatever reason. After that 6.1 installed correctly.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Good Times, thanks to all</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Nick Griffin<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Erick Bergquist <<a href="mailto:erickbee@gmail.com">erickbee@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Maybe this will help (maybe not), the one time I've worked on a IBM<br>motherboard replacement the IBM tech had to program a MTM value in<br>
when they swapped it and from my understanding that value tells what<br>type of processor, etc the motherboard has. I was told this was<br>important to have set right and maybe if it is set wrong that is why<br>the install may be picking up something else for the CPU. However, I<br>
do not know how to set it or check it without a IBM tech doing it.<br><br>HTH, Erick<br><br>On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Nick Griffin<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c"><<a href="mailto:nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com">nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> The battle continues. I was able to replace the moboard tonight, and now the<br>> bios and the cucm setup both say 3400, but the hardware validation process<br>
> in the 6.1 install still doesn't like something about the cpu. I've tried<br>> with hyper threading enabled and disabled.<br>><br>><br>><br>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Ryan Ratliff <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>> ><br>> > You need to have IBM replace the motherboard. Apparently there was an<br>> issue with a small number of those servers that reported the CPU<br>> incorrectly. I found another TAC SR with the same issue.<br>
> ><br>> ><br>> > So open a TAC SR and shoot me the number and I'll put a note in there.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > -Ryan<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>
> ><br>> ><br>> > On Mar 10, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Nick Griffin wrote:<br>> > Actually I just discovered the hardware validation log show's that it's<br>> picking the cpu up as 1.4Ghz, which oddly enough is what it displays in the<br>
> bios under system information. /proc/cpuinfo shows 6.0Ghz (HT)? It is<br>> actually at 3.4 Ghz. I've got a bios update downloaded from IBM, but I don't<br>> want to install it and risk stability with cucm 6.1. Do you have any bios<br>
> version information for IBM servers as it relates to CUCM 6.1? Thanks in<br>> advance.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Ryan Ratliff <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>> > ><br>> > > There's only the one 6.1 disk that I can see for both HP and IBM<br>> servers. According to<br>> <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/prod_brochure0900aecd8062a4f9.html" target="_blank">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/prod_brochure0900aecd8062a4f9.html</a><br>
> the 7825-I1-IPC1 is supported with 6.1.<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > Do you get a specific error message regarding clock speed, etc?<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > -Ryan<br>
> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > On Mar 10, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Nick Griffin wrote:<br>> > > Yeah, I've tried the disc a few times. There's something about the<br>
> hardware the installer doesn't like, or I don't have the correct installer<br>> for a IBM 7825.<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Charles <<a href="mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com">jonvoip@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>> > ><br>> > > > The CCM 6.1 disc does not specify HP on it, so I am guessing the IBM<br>> > > > one is the same....<br>> > > ><br>> > > > To be honest, I don't think it matters, worst case, just try the disc,<br>
> > > > if your system is not compatible, i am sure it will tell you... from<br>> > > > the specs you gave, it should be fine.<br>> > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > > > Jonathan<br>
> > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Nick Griffin<br>> > > > <<a href="mailto:nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com">nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > > > > I've finally managed to get the DMA data, now the next hurdle, I'm<br>> getting<br>> > > > > unsupported media. When using the PUT to order the CUCM 4.2 to 6.1<br>> upgrade<br>
> > > > > does anyone know if you receive a different CUCM 6.1 system disc for<br>> IBM<br>> > > > > versus HP? I'm trying to get a head start on the upgrade, I'm<br>> utilizing<br>
> > > > > media that may have been ordered against a HP server, while I wait<br>> for my<br>> > > > > PUT order to arrive. The server is 7825-I1-IPC1, it's got the dual<br>> 74GB<br>
> > > > > drives, 2 gig memory and a 3.4Ghz. I'm thinking this is a media<br>> issue, ie<br>> > > > > seperate discs for hp vs ibm. Thoughts appreciated.<br>> > > > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > > > cisco-voip mailing list<br>> > > > > <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> > > > > <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
> > > > ><br>> > > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> > > <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> > > <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
> > ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br>><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>