Thanks Paul,<br>Now i have the right concept of the deployment.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Paul <<a href="mailto:asobihoudai@yahoo.com">asobihoudai@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
No. If you read the IPCCX SRND, if you setup the<br>
co-resident installation, no HA allowed.<br>
<br>
You must have two dedicated boxes for IPCCX HA.<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
--- zohaib shabir <<a href="mailto:zohaibshabir@gmail.com">zohaibshabir@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi All,<br>
> I was going through the SRND of UCCX 6X. The<br>
> deployment model of UCCX High<br>
> Availability uses two dedicated Servers for UCCX and<br>
> i have to use two Call<br>
> Manager 4.3 for HA as well. I was wondering whether<br>
> it is possible to deploy<br>
> UCCX HA on Call Managers 4.3 co-resident in High<br>
> Availability Fashion.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Regards,<br>
> Zohaib Shabir<br>
> Network Specialist- Voice<br>
> DWP Group, TECH Division Karachi<br>
> Ph:+92-302-8232689<br>
</div></div>> > _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>
<div class="WgoR0d"><br>
<br>
<br>
____________________________________________________________________________________<br>
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.<br>
<a href="http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com" target="_blank">http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Regards,<br>Zohaib Shabir<br>Network Specialist- Voice<br>DWP Group, TECH Division Karachi<br>Ph:+92-302-8232689