<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
Not at all. �The only number CUCM will ever see coming from that FXO port is what you've got configured as the plar destination. � There is no requirement at all that CUCM have to be able to route calls to the calling party number.<div><br><div> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">-Ryan</font></p> </div><br><div><html>On Apr 10, 2008, at 2:17 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:</html><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> <font face="Times New Roman">Thanks Gregory,<br> i hope you might get somewhere.<br> I would like to ask something more about route patterns in CCM:<br> the call from FXO, because callerid is enabled, arrives with a pattern 3069XXXXX. But there is no such a route pattern in CCM because i don't need one. I only route 3 digit calls beginning with * through that voice gateway (*XXX)<br> Does CCM needs to know the "return path" for each call?Or the signalling is fine and there is no problem?<br> I mean, every time a call arrives from a H323 ios gateways, does CCM need to have a route pattern back to that h323 ios gw with the same pattern?<br> <br> Thanks<br> Anthony<br> </font><br> Gregory, Christopher D. wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:9F7C33594813F94582E7532471C342262A4FE3@MTKPRDEXCI05.norpro.com" type="cite"> <div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="159085316-09042008"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">Anthony, just saw your attachment. Sorry. I will take a look at that and get back with you</font></span></div> <br> <div class="OutlookMessageHeader" dir="ltr" align="left" lang="en-us"> <hr tabindex="-1"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Anthony Kouloglou<br> <b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, April 09, 2008 6:47 AM<br> <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck-nether.net">cisco-voip@puck-nether.net</a><br> <b>Subject:</b> [cisco-voip] Dropped calls coming from FXO<br> </font><br> </div> <font face="Times New Roman">Hi, i have a ccm 6.0 who has 2 h323 gateways configured.<br> One of them has one E1 and works fine<br> The other one, is a 2811 with 1 vic2-2fxo card and has 2 FCTs attached.<br> <br> A specific route pattern on CUCM sends calls to Company's Mobiles through 2811- This direction works fine!<br> But, an incoming call to FCT, only rings the specified DN!!<br> For example, i have a connection plar on the voice-port to send all calls to 2000 (console).<br> When someone calls FCT, 2000 rings once and then the call is dropped!!<br> The amazing is a few times it works fine!! (most of the times it doesn't)<br> <br> <i><font color="#000000">interface FastEthernet0/0.100<br> �description ### Voice Vlan interface to 3560 ###<br> �encapsulation dot1Q 100<br> �ip address 10.254.254.253 255.255.255.0<br> �h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.254.254.253<br> !<br> voice-port 0/0/0<br> �connection plar 2000<br> �description *** FXO ACTIVE port -- Connected to FCT ***<br> �bearer-cap Speech<br> �station-id name FCT<br> �station-id number 69XXXXXXX<br> !<br> voice-port 0/0/1<br> </font></i></font><i><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">�description *** FXO ACTIVE port -- Connected to FCT ***</font><font color="#000000"><br> </font></i><font face="Times New Roman"><i><font color="#000000">�connection plar 2000<br> �bearer-cap Speech<br> �station-id name FCT<br> �station-id number 69XXXXXX<br> !<br> !<br> dial-peer voice 1 pots<br> �destination-pattern .<br> �direct-inward-dial<br> !<br> dial-peer voice 2 pots<br> �destination-pattern *...<br> �port 0/0/0<br> �prefix *<br> !<br> dial-peer voice 3 pots<br> �destination-pattern *...<br> �port 0/0/1<br> �prefix *<br> !<br> dial-peer voice 2000 voip<br> �destination-pattern 2...<br> �session target ipv4:10.254.254.5<br> �dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric<br> �codec g711alaw<br> !<br> <br> </font></i><font color="#000000"><font color="#000066">I have used *... because the Telephone Company (mobile) uses *XXX for calls between its subscribers.<br> <br> In CUCM, there is *XXX route-pattern pointing to this voice gateway.<br> <br> Any ideas? It seems really bizarre that a few times it does work!!<br> <br> i also provide the voip ccapi debug of a failed call as attachment.<br> Thanks Akoul<br> </font></font></font><br> In accordance with the Black Box Anti-Virus Policy, this e-mail message has been scanned for viruses. This banner message will appear each time the message is scanned.<br> </blockquote><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">_______________________________________________</div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">cisco-voip mailing list</div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></div> </div><br></div></body></html>