<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=356152917-01052008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>So did this not make it to people, or does no one care to
offer an opinion?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=356152917-01052008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=356152917-01052008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>;-)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=356152917-01052008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=356152917-01052008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>thanks, tim</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Tim
Reimers<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:50 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> [cisco-voip] Opinions and thoughts
on running a Juniper core VLANrouter/switch with a Cisco AVVID install on top of
it?<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial size=2>hi
everyone-</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial size=2>The organization I
work for is considering purchasing a new "core" router for our
network.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial size=2>Currently we run all
Cisco equipment and have a Cisco 4.1X AVVID install - two CCM, one IPCC
(non-Unity VM though)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial size=2>The management wants
to consider running a non-Cisco core VLAN router (perhaps a Juniper), to be the
VTP server for the rest of the Cisco 3560/3750 switches in the
network</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial size=2>as it could be
considerably cheaper than a Cat6500.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial size=2>(My apologies in
advance to the Cisco guys on here for discussing non-Cisco
switching/routing/VTP hardware)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial size=2>But I would also
value your thoughts as to how the TAC might approach support calls on the
CCM/IPCC equipment in the presence of a non-Cisco
foundation.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=319213614-29042008>What do you guys
hear/know about the idea of running a non-Cisco VTP server talking to Cisco
switches at the distribution later?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=319213614-29042008></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=319213614-29042008>Considering that
there's an AVVID installation running on top of it, I figured I'd post that to
here.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=319213614-29042008></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=319213614-29042008></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=319213614-29042008>Thanks,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=319213614-29042008><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Tim</FONT></SPAN></DIV></BODY></HTML>