<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 08.00.0681.000">
<TITLE>RE: [cisco-voip] Checking NTP status on CCM</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>All our CCM servers (publisher and 5 subscribers) point to the default gateways which are configured with the time servers without any issues...<BR>
<BR>
Rasim Duric<BR>
Network Analyst (CCS)<BR>
University of Guelph<BR>
Guelph, N1G 2W1, ON<BR>
519-824-4120x53146<BR>
rduric@uoguelph.ca<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [<A HREF="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</A>] On Behalf Of Micah Bennett<BR>
Sent: May-13-08 12:08 PM<BR>
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Checking NTP status on CCM<BR>
<BR>
Thanks again for all the input. I implemented the security keys for our<BR>
primary time server and its working great. The publisher is seeing both<BR>
the primary (keyed) and secondary (non-keyed) time servers. All the<BR>
rest of my servers are still seeing the publisher until I am told<BR>
otherwise by TAC.<BR>
I hope they clear up the confusion between those two documents. Seems<BR>
to me like the best solution is to point all boxes directly to the time<BR>
servers....<BR>
<BR>
Micah Bennett<BR>
Telecommunications Admin<BR>
Automated License Systems<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net<BR>
[<A HREF="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</A>] On Behalf Of Micah Bennett<BR>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:54 AM<BR>
To: David Sullivan<BR>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Checking NTP status on CCM<BR>
<BR>
Thanks David<BR>
<BR>
This group ROCKS!<BR>
<BR>
I found the ntpd.exe on the servers. When I run it and do the "peers"<BR>
command it shows me exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for the<BR>
example and explanation.<BR>
<BR>
The publisher shows synced to my time server that does not yet have a<BR>
security key. This shows as a statum 1 source. It also shows my keyed<BR>
server, but does not indicate that it is an available source. <BR>
<BR>
The subscribers and the IPCC servers show synced to the Publisher server<BR>
as a stratum 2 source. <BR>
<BR>
What are the other NTP applications that are in that folder?<BR>
<BR>
Ntp-keygen.exe<BR>
Ntpd.exe<BR>
Ntpdate.exe<BR>
Ntpdc.exe<BR>
<BR>
Is there any reason I can't just point all of my other servers straight<BR>
to the time servers instead of the publisher.<BR>
<BR>
I am going to play with the security key setup that my linux guy gave me<BR>
and see if it will work as well. I will let everyone know the results.<BR>
<BR>
I guess since our Unity server is part of the domain and using win32<BR>
time, the setup should be like any other windows server in our network<BR>
and our windows team can help me there.<BR>
<BR>
Micah Bennett<BR>
Telecommunications Admin<BR>
Automated License Systems<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: David Sullivan [<A HREF="mailto:David.Sullivan@barnet.ac.uk">mailto:David.Sullivan@barnet.ac.uk</A>]<BR>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:30 AM<BR>
To: Micah Bennett<BR>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Checking NTP status on CCM<BR>
<BR>
cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net wrote:<BR>
> I am not sure. That is one reason I opened the case with TAC<BR>
> to clear up the confusion. One of the Cisco docs says that<BR>
> you should point your Publisher to the clock server, and<BR>
> everything else to the Publisher. Another document says that<BR>
> the NTP.conf file can only be used to point to a clock server<BR>
> and not another node such as subscriber to publisher or IPCC<BR>
> to publisher.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Our install partner back in 2007 told me to set it up the way<BR>
> it is now. Publisher to clock, all other boxes to publisher.<BR>
> I do know that right now everything appears to be in sync.<BR>
> Being able to confirm that would be great.<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
This is also how ours are configured and this was also on the<BR>
recommendation of the partner we used as well.<BR>
<BR>
> One of the other replies here on the group mentioned the ntpq<BR>
> command. Since I am still learning, I googled this and it<BR>
> appears to be a linux command. We are on CCM 4.2 with Windows OS.<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
It's the monitoring tool that comes with the Udel ntp server that is<BR>
also the one used on most Linux and Unix distributions as well as being<BR>
shipped with Call Manager, it works in the same way and can show you all<BR>
the sources, whether it can communicate with them and what the server's<BR>
synced to.<BR>
<BR>
David.<BR>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>
-----<BR>
This communication may contain privileged or confidential information<BR>
which<BR>
is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you are not the<BR>
intended recipient, please note that you may not distribute or use this<BR>
communication or the information it contains. If this e-mail has<BR>
reached you<BR>
in error, please delete it and any attachment.<BR>
<BR>
Internet communications are not secure and Barnet College does not<BR>
accept<BR>
legal responsibility for the content of this message. Any views or<BR>
opinions<BR>
expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Barnet<BR>
College.<BR>
<BR>
Please note that Barnet college reserves the right to monitor the<BR>
source/destinations of all incoming or outgoing e-mail communications.<BR>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>
-----<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
The information contained in this email and any attachments is<BR>
confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual<BR>
property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not<BR>
authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you<BR>
notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message<BR>
from your mail system.<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
cisco-voip mailing list<BR>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>
<A HREF="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
cisco-voip mailing list<BR>
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>
<A HREF="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</A><BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>