<html dir="ltr"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16643" name="GENERATOR">
<style title="owaParaStyle">P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
</style>
</head>
<body ocsi="x">
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2">Defintely routing via a Q.SIG pattern.</font></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="tahoma" size="2"></font> </div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="tahoma" size="2">Below is a debug of a call from the NEC - we dont see calling name on the phones this direction either.</font></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="tahoma" size="2"></font> </div>
<div dir="ltr">ho-vgate-1#<br>
*Aug 7 06:33:17.303: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x00DE<br>
Sending Complete<br>
Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3<br>
Standard = CCITT<br>
Transfer Capability = Speech<br>
Transfer Mode = Circuit<br>
Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s<br>
Channel ID i = 0xA9839F<br>
Exclusive, Channel 31<br>
Progress Ind i = 0x8583 - Origination address is non-ISDN<br>
Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '6547'<br>
Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown<br>
Called Party Number i = 0x80, '6005'<br>
Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown<br>
High Layer Compat i = 0x9181<br>
Locking Shift to Codeset 5<br>
Codeset 5 IE 0x32 i = 0x81<br>
*Aug 7 06:33:17.323: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x80DE<br>
Channel ID i = 0xA9839F<br>
Exclusive, Channel 31<br>
*Aug 7 06:33:17.323: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: TX -> ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x80DE<br>
Facility i = 0x91AA06800100820100A11602010106042B0C0901800B4C61622050686F6E652032<br>
Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available<br>
*Aug 7 06:33:28.651: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: TX -> CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x80DE<br>
Facility i = 0x91AA06800100820100A11602010206042B0C0902800B4C61622050686F6E652032<br>
Connected Number i = 0x0081, '66005'<br>
*Aug 7 06:33:28.699: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: RX <- CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x00DE<br>
*Aug 7 06:33:38.919: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: RX <- DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x00DE<br>
Cause i = 0x8190 - Normal call clearing<br>
*Aug 7 06:33:38.947: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x80DE<br>
*Aug 7 06:33:38.987: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x00DE<br>
</div>
<div id="divRpF651448" style="DIRECTION: ltr">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> smithsonianwa@gmail.com [smithsonianwa@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Smith [thsglobal@gmail.com]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, 7 August 2008 1:50 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> William Roy<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Alerting Name being passed to PBX<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>I'm trying to remember exactly.. but I would think there should be some Q.SIG IE's stuck in there...
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I think MGCP / Q.SIG will just send Calling name through the Facility IE anyway.. I think we should see some extra jazz in that debug.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Your 100% sure its not routing to the NEC based on an old route pattern / route list (that is still H323 not Q.SIG?)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>What does a call from the NEC to CCM look like?</div>
<div>I think we should see a Q.SIG facility or Remote Operations Protocol message with something in there.</div>
<div>There is a "Triple Combo Tool" written by one of the Cisco guys that can decode these.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Tim.</div>
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/7/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">William Roy</b> <<a href="mailto:William.Roy@l7.com.au">William.Roy@l7.com.au</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2">Answers inline...</font></div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr"> </div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="q">
<div>So thats a call from CCM to NEC...</div>
<div><font face="times new roman"></font> </div>
</span>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Yes that was a call from CCM to NEC</font></div>
<span class="q">
<div> </div>
<div>Where do you have the calling names filled in on the phone config?</div>
<div>Do you have both Display and Alerting name set on the line? (normal and ASCII?)</div>
<div><font face="times new roman"></font> </div>
</span>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Yes have Display and Alerting set for both normal and Ascii</font></div>
<span class="q">
<div> </div>
<div>Calling party settings on the gateway itself?</div>
<div><font face="times new roman"></font> </div>
</span>
<div> Calling Party Presentation - Allowed
<div><font face="times new roman"> Calling Party Selection - Originator</font></div>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Called party IE Number - Unknown</font></div>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Calling party IE number - Unknown</font></div>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Called Numbering Plan - Cisco CallManager</font></div>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Calling Numbering Plan - Cisco CallManager</font></div>
<div><font face="times new roman"></font> </div>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Display IE Delivery is greyed out and can not be set</font></div>
<div><font face="times new roman"> </font></div>
</div>
<span class="q">
<div>Route patterns to the NEC set to offnet or on net?</div>
<div><font face="times new roman"></font> </div>
</span>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Currently set to onnet</font></div>
<div><font face="times new roman"></font> </div>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Y</font>ou dont have any route patterns / translation patterns in there doing any restriction on the calling opname?</div>
<div><font face="times new roman"></font> </div>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Nope</font></div>
<span class="q">
<div> </div>
<div>GW is definitely MGCP and set to Q.SIG?</div>
<div><font face="times new roman"></font> </div>
</span>
<div><font face="times new roman"> Yes</font></div>
<div><span class="e" id="q_11b9ab6f60ec325f_11">
<div> </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/6/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">William Roy</b> <<a href="mailto:William.Roy@l7.com.au">William.Roy@l7.com.au</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2">No we do not get connected name once the call is connected only calling number. This is a debug from an IP phone to a NEC phone</font></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="tahoma" size="2"></font> </div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="tahoma" size="2"></font> </div>
<div dir="ltr">ho-vgate-1#<br>
ho-vgate-1#<br>
*Aug 6 08:21:39.106: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x001E<br>
Sending Complete<br>
Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3<br>
Standard = CCITT<br>
Transfer Capability = Speech<br>
Transfer Mode = Circuit<br>
Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s<br>
Channel ID i = 0xA9839F<br>
Exclusive, Channel 31<br>
Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '6005'<br>
Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown<br>
Called Party Number i = 0x80, '4723'<br>
Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown<br>
*Aug 6 08:21:39.166: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x801E<br>
Channel ID i = 0xA9839F<br>
Exclusive, Channel 31<br>
*Aug 6 08:21:39.170: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x801E<br>
*Aug 6 08:21:43.158: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x801E<br>
Progress Ind i = 0x8082 - Destination address is non-ISDN<br>
Connected Number i = 0x0081, '4723'<br>
*Aug 6 08:21:43.162: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x001E<br>
</div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr">
<hr>
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:smithsonianwa@gmail.com">
smithsonianwa@gmail.com</a> [<a href="mailto:smithsonianwa@gmail.com">smithsonianwa@gmail.com</a>] On Behalf Of Tim Smith [<a href="mailto:thsglobal@gmail.com">thsglobal@gmail.com</a>]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, 6 August 2008 3:54 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> William Roy<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Alerting Name being passed to PBX<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div><span>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>Hi Wil,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>What do you see with a debug isdn q931?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Do you get connected name once the call is established?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Tim.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/6/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">William Roy</b> <<a href="mailto:William.Roy@l7.com.au">William.Roy@l7.com.au</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2">I have NEC IPX2400 PBX connected to a ISR2851 via an QSIG E1 link. The ISR is setup as an MGCP gateway with a CUCM 6.1 cluster. I am not seeing Calling name being passed either from an NEC phone to
a Cisco IP phone or visa versa. Is there any debug I can run on the ISR to see if the cisco ip phone is sending Calling name?</font></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="tahoma" size="2"></font> </div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="tahoma" size="2">regards</font></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="tahoma" size="2">Wil</font></div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</span></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>