<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.gmailquote
{mso-style-name:gmail_quote;}
span.e
{mso-style-name:e;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-AU link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I don’t think the RP with a ! will work. All the Cisco IP
phones are configured with a 5 digit extension all the NEC phones are
configured with 4 digits, so if somebody on an IP phone dials another IP phone
by 4 digits only, the extension dialled wont exist until it has been flipped to
5 digits. If this is happening on the RP wont the extra digit be added
once it has matched on the RP and being sent over to the PBX?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Cheers<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Wil<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> smithsonianwa@gmail.com
[mailto:smithsonianwa@gmail.com] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Tim Smith<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, 25 August 2008 5:45 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> William Roy<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Mike Lydick; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Urgent Priority on Translation Patterns<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Yeah.. not always possible I know.. but you could use the
technically not possible excuse to cause them a little bit of pain with their
old dialling habits.. that way they decide on their own to use the new scheme
:) <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>I see the CTI RP thing.. but I'm just wondering if the route
pattern with the ! will do the same thing.. but without the CTI RP, and
forwarding...<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Since your relying on T302 anyway now...<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>RP with a ! will produce more matches and not get urgently
routed..<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>If extension exists, it will match and route<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>If not - T302 will expire, and RP will route to PBX.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Cheers,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Tim.<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span class=gmailquote>On 8/25/08, <b>William Roy</b> <<a
href="mailto:William.Roy@l7.com.au">William.Roy@l7.com.au</a>> wrote:</span>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'>I like your thinking Tim
– retrain the user </span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;
color:#1F497D'>J</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'>The beauty of using the CTI RP
and a call forward, it allows you to convert to a 5 digit number, check to see
if any IP phones are configured with the extension, if not then matches a route
pattern that sends the call over to an extension on the NEC.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt'>From:</span></b><span
lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt'> <a href="mailto:smithsonianwa@gmail.com"
target="_blank">smithsonianwa@gmail.com</a> [mailto:<a
href="mailto:smithsonianwa@gmail.com" target="_blank">smithsonianwa@gmail.com</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Tim Smith<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, 25 August 2008 4:31 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> William Roy<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Mike Lydick; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] Urgent Priority on Translation Patterns</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p>Hi Guys..<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>That is a good tip..<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>But wouldnt this just work with a route pattern<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style='color:#1F497D'>[14567]XXX!</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style='color:#1F497D'>Add a prefix digit of 6 under called party
tranform..</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style='color:#1F497D'>Then the call wouldnt be forwarded.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style='color:#1F497D'>It would still rely on interdigit timeout... but
either way.. thats a good opportunity to train the users... ? 5 second wait to
dial 4 digits... or take an extra 1 second to enter the 5th digit and it goes
straight away? :)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style='color:#1F497D'>Cheers,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style='color:#1F497D'>Tim.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>On 8/25/08, <b>William Roy</b> <<a href="mailto:William.Roy@l7.com.au"
target="_blank">William.Roy@l7.com.au</a>> wrote: <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'>Big thanks to Mike and this
alias. Have implemented the use of CTI route points to convert a 4 digit number
into a forwarded 5 digit number. I did not realise that masks could be used in
call forwards. So what I have set up is the following:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'>CTI Route point with a DN of
[14567]XXX</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'>This has a CFA set to 6XXXX.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'>E.g If a person dials 6005 this
converts to 66005, this matches a DN on an IP Phone - call completes.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'> If
a person dials 4041 this converts to 64041, this does not match an IP phone, it
now matches a route pattern that sends it over to the NEC and strips off the
leading 6 again.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'>I have the interdigit timeout
currently set to 5 seconds and we are having to wait for this to expire when
dialing 4 digits, is there away with the above solution to use a # at the end
of the pattern on the CTI route point to make it complete quicker? From my
quick testing this was not working as having the # at the end of the DN messed
up the mask on the CFA.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'>Regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'>Wil</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt'>From:</span></b><span
lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt'> Mike Lydick [mailto:<a
href="mailto:mike.lydick@gmail.com" target="_blank">mike.lydick@gmail.com</a>] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, 22 August 2008 7:19 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>;
William Roy<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Re: Urgent Priority on Translation Patterns</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>We have done similar call routing in the form
of short dials for 10 digit assigned stations. You will not want to us
translations for any number ranges that overlap because of the urgent priority.
For the translations that overlap think of using CTI routepoints or ports and
class of services for these to devices (virtual) to prioritize the number
translations lower (or higher). If you give the Number range and examples of
the overlap I am sure the group will get more specific on a solution.<br>
<br clear=all>
<br>
-- <br>
Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Mike Lydick<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>