<html dir="ltr"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3243" name="GENERATOR">
<style title="owaParaStyle">P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
</style>
</head>
<body ocsi="x">
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2">Yes they both look fine and there are calls up on both links. Do you know if all of the active calls on E1's in the information you provide are for outbound calls that have matched the
<font face="Times New Roman" size="3">0301T pattern? If they are then that suggests your dial-peer configuration is correct and calls are being spread between the two dial peers 4003 and 4006.</font></font></div>
<p><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2"><font face="times new roman" size="3"></font></font> </p>
<p><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2"><font face="times new roman" size="3">Try running - debug isdn q931 when you make the 31St call and see if that provides any insight on why the call is not going though.</font></font></p>
<p><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2"><font face="times new roman" size="3"></font></font> </p>
<p><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2"><font face="times new roman" size="3">Have both the E1's been provision by the telco as full 30 channels or could they be fractional E1's?
</font><br>
</p>
</font>
<div id="divRpF565771" style="DIRECTION: ltr">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> Tseveendorj Ochirlantuu [tseveendorj@gmail.com]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, 10 September 2008 4:02 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> William Roy<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peer related question<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">I think yes. You can see following information.<br>
<br>
as5350_Voice_GW#sh isdn status <br>
Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5<br>
ISDN Serial2/0:15 interface<br>
******* Network side configuration ******* <br>
dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5<br>
Layer 1 Status:<br>
ACTIVE<br>
Layer 2 Status:<br>
TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED<br>
Layer 3 Status:<br>
9 Active Layer 3 Call(s)<br>
CCB:callid=8CB3, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=14, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8CD0, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=6, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D10, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=5, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D18, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=7, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D19, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=9, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D25, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=3, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D29, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=8, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D37, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=4, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D3B, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=1, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D44, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=2, calltype=VOICE<br>
Active dsl 0 CCBs = 10<br>
The Free Channel Mask: 0xBFFF5E00<br>
Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 49<br>
ISDN Serial2/3:15 interface<br>
******* Network side configuration ******* <br>
dsl 1, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5<br>
Layer 1 Status:<br>
ACTIVE<br>
Layer 2 Status:<br>
TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED<br>
Layer 3 Status:<br>
3 Active Layer 3 Call(s)<br>
CCB:callid=8D15, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=6, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D3E, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=7, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D41, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=5, calltype=VOICE<br>
CCB:callid=8D43, sapi=0, ces=0, B-chan=1, calltype=VOICE<br>
Active dsl 1 CCBs = 4<br>
The Free Channel Mask: 0xBFFF7F8E<br>
Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 108<br>
Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 14<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:53 PM, William Roy <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:William.Roy@l7.com.au">William.Roy@l7.com.au</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2">Are both isdn e1 interfaces up and working correctly?</font></div>
<div dir="ltr"> </div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr">
<hr>
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">
cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Tseveendorj Ochirlantuu [<a href="mailto:tseveendorj@gmail.com">tseveendorj@gmail.com</a>]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, 10 September 2008 2:38 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net">cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [cisco-voip] dial-peer related question<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c">
<div></div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Hi guys<br>
<br>
I have 5350 gateway and gateway connected to internet via gigenthernet, connected to ISDN by 2 E1 ports via PRI.
<br>
<br>
Dial peer looks like this : <br>
<br>
dial-peer voice 4002 voip<br>
voice-class codec 1<br>
session target ipv4:<a href="http://61.250.94.66" target="_blank">61.250.94.66</a><br>
incoming called-number 0301T<br>
dtmf-relay rtp-nte h245-signal h245-alphanumeric<br>
fax-relay ecm disable<br>
fax rate 9600<br>
fax protocol t38 ls-redundancy 2 hs-redundancy 2 fallback none<br>
!<br>
dial-peer voice 4003 pots<br>
destination-pattern 0301T<br>
progress_ind alert enable 8<br>
direct-inward-dial<br>
port 2/0:D<br>
!<br>
dial-peer voice 4006 pots<br>
destination-pattern 0301T<br>
progress_ind alert enable 8<br>
direct-inward-dial<br>
port 2/3:D<br>
!<br>
<br>
The call coming from dial-peer 4002 and outgoing to 4003, 4006.<br>
<br>
30 calls came from 4002 to 4003 and 4006 it can handle when 31th call came it couldn't.
<br>
I think 2E1 card can handle 60 calls. but it didn't. I think problem in configuration.<br>
<br>
How to solve it?<br>
<br>
Thanks for any help<br>
<br>
Sincerely,<br>
Tseveen.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>