<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3395" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I set up translations that bypass the masking, like
police and voicemail.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>But that being said, I should look at our
translations to see if I block connected party presentation!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Lelio<BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>Lelio
Fulgenzi, B.A.<BR>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1<BR>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
(JNHN)<BR>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<BR>...seen on a Geek Squad patch cord: "While it is the same length, this 7'
crossover cable<BR>is not regulation issue for most competitive Manhattan double
dutch leagues.</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ealeatherman@gmail.com href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com">Ed
Leatherman</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:09
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cisco-voip] internal
numbers ID masking</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>Sorry to revive an old thread, but running into a "new" snag in
this, at least something we hadn't considered before.<BR><BR>I set up internal
caller-ID masks per below, normally everything is fine. But we've discovered
that if a secretary transfers a caller in to the person who's number is
supposed to be masked, their true number is displayed on the calling party's
IP Phone as the connected number. Don't ask me how we've missed that one for
the passed 4 years.<BR><BR>I've changed my translation pattern to restrict the
"connected line id presentation" which did the trick.. but it totally scewed
up their voicemail now. If a masked party calls someone and gets forwarded to
voicemail, they get Unity's opening greeting rather than the called person's
mailbox. When i look at the call viewer in unity, it looks like the forwarding
number is blank. What would the connected party line ID of the caller have to
do with the forwarding number?<BR><BR>CCM 5.1.3<BR>Unity 4.2<BR><BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Wed, Apr 5, 2006 at 8:41 PM, Ed Leatherman <SPAN
dir=ltr><<A
href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com">ealeatherman@gmail.com</A>></SPAN>
wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">I
never noticed the "Restricted" setting on there (or didnt realize what it
was for). A lot of the users request that their secretaries numbers show up
instead.. but for the ones that just what "Private" that would be quite a
bit easier to just reuse one. Thanks! <BR>
<DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=Wj3C7c><BR>
<DIV><SPAN class=gmail_quote>On 4/5/06, <B class=gmail_sendername>Kevin
Thorngren</B> <<A href="mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com"
target=_blank>kthorngr@cisco.com</A>> wrote:</SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">Right,
I missed Ed's statement of "and of course, all masked as<BR>something
different" :-) As Lelio mentioned the easiest way is
to<BR>Restrict the Calling Line ID and Calling Name (if appropriate) in
the<BR>Translation Pattern. There is no easy mechanism to
change the Caller <BR>ID on a phone by phone basis. One could
write a script to query a DB<BR>and mask the Caller ID based on the source
of the call. This way only<BR>the DB would need to be
updated. To make it seamless all internal<BR>calls should be
intercepted by this script but it could be built so<BR>only those phones
that need to mask the Caller ID are intercepted.<BR>Building a system that
would be robust enough to handle the call volume<BR>might be a challenge
and potentially costly. <BR><BR>I would agree that having the ability to
restrict the Caller ID info<BR>from the phone would be
best. Interesting changes would be the ability<BR>to restrict
the ID and Name and also an Internal Phone Number Mask. <BR>Not sure if
either of these are on the roadmap.<BR><BR>Kevin<BR>On Apr 4, 2006, at
10:06 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:<BR><BR>> It's basically a new partition
(and everything else) for every<BR>> modified mask you want. <BR>>
<BR>> It would be very handy to have this on a per phone
basis.<BR>>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>>> From: Kevin
Thorngren<BR>>> To: Ed Leatherman<BR>>> Cc: <A
href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
target=_blank>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</A> ; Grullon,David<BR>>>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:03 PM<BR>>> Subject: Re:
[cisco-voip] internal numbers ID masking<BR>>><BR>>> Out of
curiosity - why do you create a new Partition, CSS and <BR>>>
Translation Pattern for each phone that wants to hide the Caller
ID?<BR>>><BR>>> Kevin<BR>>> On Apr 4, 2006, at 9:19 PM,
Ed Leatherman wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>> If someone knows a
better/cleaner way to do this, I would be <BR>>>> ecstatic to
hear it. this is a big pain in the rear for us, so many<BR>>>>
professors and doctors want their caller ID masked from
everyone<BR>>>> (and of course, all masked as something
different) <BR>>>><BR>>>> On 4/4/06, Ed Leatherman
<<A href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com"
target=_blank>ealeatherman@gmail.com</A>> wrote:This is<BR>>>>
something I wish was easier to do with callmanager. Here is what we
<BR>>>> do..<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> -Make a new
partition, we call it MaskCLIDAs<number><BR>>>>> -Make a
new Calling search space, we call it
Device_MaskAs<number><BR>>>>> -Put the
MaskCLIDAs<Number> partition as the first entry in the new
<BR>>>>> CSS, and then put any additional partitions you would
need to call<BR>>>>> (outbound partitions
etc)<BR>>>>> -Make a Translation pattern that will match all
your internal<BR>>>>> extensions, and use it to modify the
calling party number to <BR>>>>> whatever you like. Make sure
you set the new calling search space<BR>>>>> as something that
can call your internal numbers. The new<BR>>>>> translation
pattern should be in your new partition. <BR>>>>> -Configure
the phone with the new CSS<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
basically you want interal callers to hit that new
translation<BR>>>>> pattern when they call another internal
number, so that it modifies <BR>>>>> the calling party number
and then proceeds as normal with the call.<BR>>>>> Otherwise
it places outside calls as normal.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
Does that help? As you can imagine if you do this alot, you get
<BR>>>>> alot of partition/CSS/translation pattern clutter on
callmanager.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> One thing to be
careful of is to make sure your masked phones can<BR>>>>>
still call everything they need to (call pickup groups tripped us
<BR>>>>> up on this) with the new CSS. And also make sure they
still cannot<BR>>>>> call things they shouldnt
:)<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> On 4/4/06, Grullon, David <
<A href="mailto:David.Grullon@co.galveston.tx.us"
target=_blank>David.Grullon@co.galveston.tx.us</A>>
wrote:<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> I am trying to mask
a number internally, extension to
extension.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Thanks<BR>>>>>> Dave
<BR>>>>>><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR>Ed
Leatherman<BR>Assistant Director, Voice Services<BR>West Virginia
University<BR>Telecommunications and Network Operations<BR></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>cisco-voip mailing
list<BR>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>