<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>route patterns, route groups and gateways all have precedence over a phones external calling mask. (maybe not route groups)<br><br>you'd have to create a special group of those via CCS to mask the external calling mask of those emergency phones.<br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Matthew J. Hughes" <mattjhughes@gmail.com><br>To: "cisco-voip@puck-nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 2:08:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Alternative to a External Phone Number Mask<br><br><div dir="ltr">Most phones on our network have DIDs instead of extensions but for some emergency phones I started to use extensions. I want to give all these phones one external number mask, however I dont want the external Number mask to appear on the phone, instead I want its local extension. Can I use something else besides External Mask? Translation pattern mayhaps?<br>
<br>Matt <br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
</div></body></html>