<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Gatekeeper question</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I was originally looking to deploy gatekeepers
in a voice only infrastructure for address resolution between a number
of sites which all have their own Site codes- no problem however
now we are looking to make use of the same GK`s for video again using the
same sites codes- is the single GK approach for voice and video recommended?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The video devices will register to a
regional CCM, this CCM will route normal voice traffic to the GK as well</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Voice calls dial 8xx+ extension number
to dial another site, the 8 is a route pattern to the GK</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Ideally only one set of Gatekeepers
to serve both voice and video</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Same access code for voice and video
8xxxxx </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Below is a simple example of a
possible GK set up </font>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local London cisco.com x.x.x.x</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local New York</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local Tokyo</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone prefix London 812*</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone prefix New York 846*</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone prefix Tokyo 823 *</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Issue</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I would like for a video call to be
sent to the GK for resolution but be governed by the bandwidth commend
say 384 for Video however a voice call to the same site to be governed
by either no bandwidth control or another figure e.g 880. Also I`m trying
to cut down on the amount of commends in the GK so this is
the reason we wish to use GK`s</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Can it be done?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">My thinking is as bandwidth commend
is linked to the name of the zone and so the name of CCM registered to
it , can I register two trunks to the GK from the same CCM
but with different names and use the routing in CCM to pick the voice trunk
and the video trunk? </font>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> Zone local
Londonvoice cisco.com x.x.x.x</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local New Yorkvoice</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local Tokyovoice</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> Zone local
Londonvideo</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local New Yorkvideo</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local Tokyo</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">video</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">however I then have the issue of wanting
to use the same access code for both calls</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Again maybe use different tech-prefix
on the voice trunk and video trunk 1#. 2# and somehow use this for routing
in the same way as a zone prefix? can you associate a bandwidth to
a tech-prefix. I know you can use hopoff based upon the tech-prefix
but how good is this approach and is it recommended? Another way is If
we do not allocate any bandwidth setting to voice but only video
then the voice calls could use the hop off statements for routing and
the video use the zone local statements , how much work is this , is it
recommended?</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">An other way is to use two access codes
8 for voice #8 for video, if I do this do I need to have multiple local
zone as below but the question is still can the CCM register two
different trunks so to create the different zones LONDONVOICE,
LONDONVIDEO to the same GK ?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> Zone local Londonvoice.cisco.com
x.x.x.x</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local New Yorkvoice</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local Tokyovoice</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> Zone local
Londonvideo</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local New Yorkvideo</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone local Tokyo</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">video</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone prefix Londonvoice 812*</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone prefix New Yorkvoice 846*</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone prefix Tokyovoice 823 *</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">
</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone prefix Londonvideo #812*</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone prefix New Yorkvideo #846*</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Zone prefix Tokyovideo #823 *</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I could then at least have different
bandwidths per zone</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">bandwidth interzone new yorkvoice 880</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">bandwidth interzone new yorkvideo 384</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Also can you have bandwidth zone between
individual zones i.e to limit the number of calls between CCM A to
CCM B to be 880 but CCM A to CCM C to be 128 due to the different
possible links </font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Sorry for the multiple questions</font>
<br>
<br>