Ryan, here's the response on the 2801:<br><br>Macro Exp.: 8*825551212<br>No match, result=1<br><br><br>Methinks the asterisk may be sort of a "reserved keyword". (Maybe used as a wildcard or something)<br><br>
Thanks for any help!<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ryan Ratliff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="">
Do the dial-peers on the gateway allow it to route that called party number correctly?<div><br></div><div>Take your number (ie 8*825555555) and use 'show dialplan number' to verify what dial-peer it will match.</div>
<div><br></div><div><font color="#888888"><div> <p style="margin: 0px;"><font style="font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;" face="Helvetica" size="3">-Ryan</font></p>
</div></font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br><div><div>On Dec 9, 2008, at 5:27 PM, David Zhars wrote:</div><br>The 2801 is in H.323<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ryan Ratliff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com" target="_blank">rratliff@cisco.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div>Is the 2801 MGCP or H.323? <div>With discard digits none you are sending 8*82.... to the gateway. If the telco can't route this it will send back unknown/unallocated number and CUCM will play that tone via Annunciator.</div>
<div><br><div><div style="margin: 0px;"><font style="font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;" face="Helvetica" size="3">-Ryan</font></div>
</div><br><div><div><div></div><div><div>On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:14 PM, David Zhars wrote:</div><br>Yes, I have some lines where we block caller ID plugged into my 2801 router.<br>When we tried to call a #, that # would not accept calls from people who block their Caller ID.<br>
So we tried the *82 suffix, and it did not go through.<br> <br>I have created a route pattern that looks like this:<br>8.*82[2-9]XXXXXX<br>(users in this building press an 8 for an outside line)<br><br>My Discard Digits is set to <none><br>
<br>The calls are still not completed (I get the Cisco "call cannot be completed as dialed")<br> Calls should go out the POTS lines on the 2801, so is it that I should be doing something on the 2801 and not in CCM 4.1(3)<br>
<br>Thanks anyone!<br><br><br><br><br></div></div><div style="margin: 0px;">_______________________________________________</div><div style="margin: 0px;">cisco-voip mailing list</div><div style="margin: 0px;"><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></div> </div><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><br>
</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>