<div>1. Both Polycom and Tandberg are really good IP VC units. we have both. but lately have been buying more Tandberg. Just trying to standardize.</div>
<div> 1.1 A lot has to do with what your looking for? Some of the higer end units have a 3 or 4 way bridge built in. </div>
<div> if yiou going to do larger conference rooms you might look at a mic mixer so you can get everyones audio</div>
<div>2. BW is going to be a Company based requirement. 384k would be the minimum I would look at for a standard H323 IPVC. Now with that being said if I were getting into it now and money was not a BIG isusu I would start leaning toward the HD IPVCs but I don't know what the minimum BW you would want for them.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Just my 2 cents</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Scott<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Syed Khalid Ali <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:syed.khalid.khursheed@gmail.com">syed.khalid.khursheed@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">I don't have any experience with Video Conferencing except one that I<br>mentioned inmy previous email.<br>
<br>Not looking for Cisco VTA or something similar. I need to setup video<br>conferencing for 8-10 users in a conference room in site-A and 1-user<br>in site-B. So need suggestions on the following:<br><br>1- Should I go with Polycom or Tandberg<br>
1.1 What features should I look for<br>2- Bandwidth requirement.<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c"><br><br>On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Scott Voll <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> please explain what your looking to do.<br>><br>> if it's just simple phone to phone stuff, VTA works good. you will need to<br>
> setup a MCU (which is not cheap) for any thing more then point to point.<br>><br>> Scott<br>><br>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Syed Khalid Ali<br>> <<a href="mailto:syed.khalid.khursheed@gmail.com">syed.khalid.khursheed@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>>> Dear all,<br>>><br>>> One of our client want to go for Video Conferencing setup. I need<br>>> suggestion or feedback if some one already have.<br>>> Running CCM 4.2(3) and IPCCX 4.0.<br>
>><br>>> A few month earlier I had a chance to setup Video Conferencing with<br>>> Polycom HD 9000 series but all in vain. After doing some research I<br>>> found out that IOS had some NAT caveat(s) that was unresolved.<br>
>><br>>> So I am in doubt what to do!<br>>> --<br>>> Thanks,<br>>> Syed Khalid Ali<br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br>><br><br><br><br></div></div>--<br>Thanks,<br><font color="#888888">Syed Khalid Ali<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>