<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<BR>
For unicast MOH you will have a single stream from the MOH server for each request; so this problem should be solved but be aware of the capcity of the MOH server and your estimated required MOH streams. Each call that is put on hold, transfered, or so will require a single MOH stream for the MOH server.<BR><BR><BR>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>Thanks,</FONT><BR><FONT color=#000000>Ahmed Elnagar</FONT><BR><FONT color=#000000 size=3></FONT> <BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:51:24 -0600<BR>From: nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com<BR>To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<BR>Subject: [cisco-voip] MOH Unicast vs Mcast, quick question<BR><BR>I have a customer concerned about callers getting placed on hold and coming into the MOH stream mid way through. They are currently using mcast moh, if I switch this to unicast will it resolve the complaint or will callers still get merge in an already in progress MOH stream? Thanks in advance!<BR><BR>Nick Griffin<BR></DIV><br /><hr />Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! <a href='http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us' target='_new'>Try it!</a></body>
</html>