Antonio,<br><br>Or just simply gain root access to callmanager 6, then go to directory /usr/local/bin/ then just type<br><br><br>./delKnownHostKeys.sh<br><br>Take a look some scripts here<br>[root@PUBCLUSTER01 bin]# ls<br>
acserver idblj<br>amc InformixPerm.py<br>AudioTranslator installdb<br>BPS invoke_sub_restore.py<br>capf ipvmsd<br>capf_migrate isprimarynode.sh<br>
carschlr jpreftool<br>carScript.py LpmScript.sh<br>ccm LpmTool<br>ccmAgentScript.py mmfSpy<br>ccmAgt mmfSpyScript.sh<br>ccmalarmprogram.sh ModPrefDirXMLGenerator.py<br>
CCMDirSync moh_do_backup.py<br>ccmevidence.sh moh_do_restore.py<br>ccmlogRotate moh_drf_reg.py<br>ccmScript.sh moh_pre_backup.py<br>cdpAgentScript.py moh_pre_restore.py<br>
cdpAgt mohw1update<br>cdpd parseReplStatus.py<br>cdpScript.sh phonetool<br>cdragent picli<br>cdragntScript.py pidump<br>cdrrep pishell<br>
cdrScript.py pixml<br>cef pktCap_protectData<br>cfrt post_backup.py<br>checksoapservice.py post_backup.sh<br>CiscoSyslogSubAgt post_db_backup.py<br>client.truststore post_db_backup.sh<br>
cmi post_db_restore.py<br>cmoninit post_db_restore.sh<br>controlcenter.py post_restore.py<br>controlcenter.sh post_restore.sh<br>count_fds.pldl pre_backup.py<br>
cpulimit_script.sh pre_backup.sh<br>ctftp pre_db_backup.py<br>CTIManager pre_db_backup.sh<br>CTLProvider pre_db_restore.py<br>database_dependency.xml pre_db_restore.sh<br>
database_error_map.txt prefsCommand.py<br>database_script.xml prefsdrf<br>datavalidation preftool<br>dbIntegrity.py pre_restore.py<br>dbl pre_restore.sh<br>dblmanager pryftool<br>
dblping replhelper.sh<br>dblrpc replutil.py<br>dblutil RisDC<br>dbmon rtmtreporter<br>dbnotifymon runDrvMon.py<br>dbReplHelper.py setDbLogMessage.sh<br>
DbReplRepair.py setsoapvar<br>DbReplStatus.py setvar<br>DbReplStop.py sftp.exp<br>dbsession.py soapservicecontrol.sh<br>dbStateInfo.py spltraceRotate<br>delKnownHostKeys.sh startdbl<br>
DHCPMonitor startrpc<br>do_backup.py syslogAgentScript.py<br>do_backup.sh TAPS<br>do_db_backup.py tct_startup.sh<br>do_db_backup.sh Test_soap_cdrondemand_file.sh<br>do_db_restore.py Test_soap_cdrondemand_list.sh<br>
do_db_restore.sh Test_soap_df_realtimeservice.sh<br>do_db_uff_backup.sh Test_soap_drfservice.sh<br>do_restore.py Test_soap_logcollectionservice.sh<br>do_restore.sh Test_soap_perfmonservice.sh<br>
DriverMonitor Test_soap_realtimeservice70.sh<br>dropAdminDb.py Test_soap_realtimeservice.sh<br>error_661.sh Test_soap_serviceactivation.sh<br>ftp.exp Test_soap_snmpconfigservice.sh<br>
generateEncryptOut.sh tracecollectionservice<br>generateHashOut.sh validate_csv.sh<br>getdbname.py<br>[root@PUBCLUSTER01 bin]# <br><br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:00 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to<br> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net</a><br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Odd question (Frazee, Timothy)<br> 2. Re: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19 (Ant?nio Fragoso)<br>
3. Re: Odd question (Weigand, John V.)<br> 4. admin activity log (Scott Kee)<br> 5. Re: admin activity log (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br> 6. Two welcome message on call manager7.0 (Ahmad Alkam)<br> 7. Re: Two welcome message on call manager7.0 (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
8. Re: Two welcome message on call manager7.0 (Ahmad Alkam)<br> 9. Re: Two welcome message on call manager7.0 (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br> 10. Re: IPCCX 5 on VMWare ESX (Scott Voll)<br> 11. Re: admin activity log (Wes Sisk)<br>
12. Re: Click to call 7.0 and CCM 6.1(2) (Jason Burns)<br> 13. Re: admin activity log (Jason Aarons (US))<br> 14. Please remove me from this list - Thanks (Nasser Khwaja)<br> 15. Re: Please remove me from this list - Thanks (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
16. Re: configuring Cube mtp supporting g729 (Richard Humphries)<br> 17. ccmadmin and ccmuser pages....port numbers (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br> 18. Quietest router for CME (Mark Holloway)<br> 19. Re: Quietest router for CME (Jason Aarons (US))<br>
20. UCCX Node Manager fails after SQL2000 installation (<a href="mailto:rj.e@gmx.de">rj.e@gmx.de</a>)<br> 21. Meeting Place Express, Can't send notification email (Nicolas)<br> 22. I've seen it all now... (Ed Leatherman)<br>
23. UCCX Historical Reporting client install (Biffle, Gerrad)<br> 24. What could cause a "buzzing" rather than call progress tones?<br> (Robert Kulagowski)<br> 25. Re: What could cause a "buzzing" rather than call progress<br>
tones? (Ryan Ratliff)<br> 26. Re: What could cause a "buzzing" rather than call progress<br> tones? (James Edmondson)<br> 27. Re: What could cause a "buzzing" rather than call progress<br> tones? (Robert Kulagowski)<br>
28. Re: What could cause a "buzzing" rather than call progress<br> tones? (Robert Kulagowski)<br> 29. Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection (Voll, Scott)<br> 30. Lock IPPHONE 7970 and 7911 (Ant?nio Fragoso)<br>
31. 2811 Router with FXS Ports (Michael Dugan)<br> 32. Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection (Erick Bergquist)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:45:15 -0600<br>From: "Frazee, Timothy" <<a href="mailto:Timothy_Frazee@adp.com">Timothy_Frazee@adp.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Odd question<br>To: <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:723FA17C6AA4C4428CDF572DCAEE08D408540863@EXCHANGEDS01.ds.ad.adp.com">723FA17C6AA4C4428CDF572DCAEE08D408540863@EXCHANGEDS01.ds.ad.adp.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br><br><br>A client asked me this and I could not answer. Any Ideas what the 2<br>numbers next to the blue and yellow symbols mean?<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/4054d9b3/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/4054d9b3/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: not available<br>Type: image/png<br>Size: 10720 bytes<br>Desc: image001.png<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/4054d9b3/attachment-0001.png" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/4054d9b3/attachment-0001.png</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:51:05 -0100<br>From: Ant?nio Fragoso <<a href="mailto:Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv">Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>"<br> <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>>, "<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>"<br>
<<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <0B9DBADCC054F343A927FD1BC72C60AB06FA4C299A@exchangemb-srv.baicv.local><br><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br><br>________________________________<br>De: Ant?nio Fragoso<br>Enviado: segunda-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2009 19:44<br>Para: Ant?nio Fragoso; Lelio Fulgenzi; <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Assunto: RE: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br><br><br><br>Great<br>I got it<br><br>See the message I receive now<br>localhost,127.0.0.1 ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEA1k+Kt1p4t+HIQhWzEepjJJfQIrlgROS3B26gg9l8BeXrpkfSZgKu5cve35v 5MIu2mHD7+a9qDPAt042MLIwEiR0fK7kF5pX6/3AYVq6ECbI5fxYHTPi9y8yBTExemcoQwDzQYi9HW05Sskw+JFeF5++5UNcYOrdYtU7e/2x0oUk=<br>
CCM-SRV,172.19.0.253 ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEA1k+Kt1p4t+HIQhWzEepjJJfQIrlgROS3B26gg9l8BeXrpkfSZgKu5cve35 v5MIu2mHD7+a9qDPAt042MLIwEiR0fK7kF5pX6/3AYVq6ECbI5fxYHTPi9y8yBTExemcoQwDzQYi9HW05Sskw+JFeF5++5UNcYOrdYtU7e/2x0oUk=<br>
<br>Antonio Fragoso<br>[cid:image001.jpg@01C97A6E.4ACBC7F0]<br>BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.<br>Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunica?ao<br>Edif?cio Santa Maria, 1? Andar<br>Ch? de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459<br>Santiago, Cabo Verde<br>
Tel.: +238 260 1224/26<br>Fax: +238 262 2810<br><a href="mailto:antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv">antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv">nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv</a>><br><a href="http://www.bancobai.cv/" target="_blank">www.bancobai.cv</a><<a href="http://www.bancobai.ao/" target="_blank">http://www.bancobai.ao/</a>><br>
<br>De: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>]<br>Enviada: segunda-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2009 18:56<br>Para: Ant?nio Fragoso<br>Assunto: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br>
<br>my guess is you would ssh to it. then use one of the administration userID and passwords.<br><br>I'm not familiar with v6 unfortunately.<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Ant?nio Fragoso" <<a href="mailto:Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv">Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv</a>><br>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 2:51:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br>
Hi L?lio<br>DO you know how Can I acees remotely to CLI CCM ver 6 ?<br><br><br>Antonio Fragoso<br>[<a href="https://zcs2.mail.uoguelph.ca/service/home/~/?auth=co&id=123863&part=2" target="_blank">https://zcs2.mail.uoguelph.ca/service/home/%7E/?auth=co&id=123863&part=2</a>]<br>
BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.<br>Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunica?ao<br>Edif?cio Santa Maria, 1? Andar<br>Ch? de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459<br>Santiago, Cabo Verde<br>Tel.: +238 260 1224/26<br>Fax: +238 262 2810<br><a href="mailto:antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv">antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv">nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv</a>><br>
<a href="http://www.bancobai.cv/" target="_blank">www.bancobai.cv</a><<a href="http://www.bancobai.ao/" target="_blank">http://www.bancobai.ao/</a>><br><br>De: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>]<br>
Enviada: segunda-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2009 18:51<br>Para: Ant?nio Fragoso<br>Assunto: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br><br>not sure why. i'm doing it on unity connection 7.0.<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "Ant?nio Fragoso" <<a href="mailto:Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv">Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv</a>><br>To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 2:45:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br>Hi lelio<br>At the CLI interface I put 'file dump sftpdetails known_hosts' but I receive the answer that the file cannot be found<br>
<br><br>Antonio Fragoso<br>[<a href="https://zcs2.mail.uoguelph.ca/service/home/~/?auth=co&id=123852&part=2" target="_blank">https://zcs2.mail.uoguelph.ca/service/home/%7E/?auth=co&id=123852&part=2</a>]<br>
BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.<br>Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunica?ao<br>Edif?cio Santa Maria, 1? Andar<br>Ch? de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459<br>Santiago, Cabo Verde<br>Tel.: +238 260 1224/26<br>Fax: +238 262 2810<br><a href="mailto:antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv">antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv">nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv</a>><br>
<a href="http://www.bancobai.cv/" target="_blank">www.bancobai.cv</a><<a href="http://www.bancobai.ao/" target="_blank">http://www.bancobai.ao/</a>><br><br>De: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>]<br>
Enviada: segunda-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2009 18:42<br>Para: Ryan Ratliff<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>; Ant?nio Fragoso<br>Assunto: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br>
<br>The top of the file shows the following. Maybe it's done automatically. *shrug*.<br><br>#This file was generated by the ~sftpuser/.ssh/known_hosts replication daemon.<br>#It is automatically updated as nodes are added, changed, removed from the cluster.<br>
<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Ryan Ratliff" <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>><br>To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>, "Ant?nio Fragoso" <<a href="mailto:Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv">Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv</a>><br>Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 1:37:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br><br>CSCsi60851 was one bug somewhat related. That one got you after doing a DRF restore.<br><br>I'm not sure how we will behave when encountering a conflict in ssh keys. I'd hope overwrite would be an automatic selection. You can use 'file dump sftpdetails known_hosts' to see the current keys.<br>
<br>The DRF MA traces would probably give Antonio more specific info on this failure.<br><br><br>-Ryan<br><br>On Jan 19, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:<br><br>I was wondering about this. I'm assuming the system automatically accepts the hosts key the first time around. I'd hate to have to call TAC to delete this key if the host IP address changed.<br>
<br>Is that the only option?<br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Ryan Ratliff" <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>>><br>
To: "Ant?nio Fragoso" <<a href="mailto:Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv">Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv">Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv</a>>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 1:11:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br><br>If you are using SFTP did you change hardware or use a different machine with the same IP address/hostname? This can cause ssh key issues and may require root access to remove the old entry.<br>
<br>-Ryan<br><br>On Jan 19, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Ant?nio Fragoso wrote:<br><br>I have a good connective between the CallManager and the HOST<br>And the user is OK<br><br>Antonio Fragoso<br><image001.jpg><br>BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.<br>
Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunica?ao<br>Edif?cio Santa Maria, 1? Andar<br>Ch? de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459<br>Santiago, Cabo Verde<br>Tel.: +238 260 1224/26<br>Fax: +238 262 2810<br><a href="mailto:antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv">antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv">nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv</a>><br>
<a href="http://www.bancobai.cv/" target="_blank">www.bancobai.cv</a><<a href="http://www.bancobai.ao/" target="_blank">http://www.bancobai.ao/</a>><br><br>De: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>]<br>
Enviada: segunda-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2009 16:49<br>Para: Ant?nio Fragoso<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Assunto: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 19<br><br>The server is testing the connection to the (s)ftp server you specified and it is either failing to connect or the login information is not working.<br>
<br>-Ryan<br><br>On Jan 19, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Ant?nio Fragoso wrote:<br><br>Hi team<br>I am configuring the CDR ( on the CDR Management CCM ver 6 )and I am receiving the following error<br>Connection Error - Please Check the FTP / SFTP Parameters<br>
<br><br><br>Antonio Fragoso<br><br>BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.<br>Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunica?ao<br>Edif?cio Santa Maria, 1? Andar<br>Ch? de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459<br>Santiago, Cabo Verde<br>Tel.: +238 260 1224/26<br>
Fax: +238 262 2810<br><a href="mailto:antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv">antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv">antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv</a>><br><a href="http://www.bancobai.cv/" target="_blank">www.bancobai.cv</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/47871266/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/47871266/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: image001.jpg<br>Type: image/jpeg<br>Size: 3305 bytes<br>Desc: image001.jpg<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/47871266/attachment-0001.jpg" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/47871266/attachment-0001.jpg</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 3<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:56:31 -0500<br>From: "Weigand, John V." <<a href="mailto:jvw@medicineforthedefense.com">jvw@medicineforthedefense.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Odd question<br>To: "Frazee, Timothy" <<a href="mailto:Timothy_Frazee@adp.com">Timothy_Frazee@adp.com</a>>,<br> <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:1E196438D2BA76448E5A077C8C99329D12535809@lmiexmb01.corp.medicineforthedefense.com">1E196438D2BA76448E5A077C8C99329D12535809@lmiexmb01.corp.medicineforthedefense.com</a>><br><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br><a href="http://www.medicineforthedefense.com/" target="_blank">http://www.medicineforthedefense.com/</a><br>I think it may just be Cisco's icon to signify it's a DN - there's other<br>
icons for if it's a BFL, Service URL, Speed Dial, etc.<br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Frazee, Timothy<br>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 1:45 PM<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Odd question<br><br><br><br><br><br>A client asked me this and I could not answer. Any Ideas what the 2<br>
numbers next to the blue and yellow symbols mean?<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>John V. Weigand<br>Help Desk Support/Executive Support<br><br>Litigation Management, Inc.<br>300 Allen-Bradley Drive<br>Suite 200<br>
Mayfield Heights, OH 44124<br><br><br><br><br>Tel: 440-484-2000<br>Fax: 440-484-2009<br>Cell:<br>email: mailto:<a href="mailto:jvw@medicineforthedefense.com">jvw@medicineforthedefense.com</a><br><br>PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE<br>
<br>The information in this electronic mail is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain privileged and confidential material and may be protected under law by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended receiver is prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this electronic e-mail or by calling (800) 778-5424. Please delete it from your computer. Thank you.<br>
<br><br><br>This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the<br>addressee and may contain information that is privileged and<br>confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient<br>
or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are<br>hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly<br>prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any<br>
attachments from your system.<br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/0abcb2c8/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/0abcb2c8/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: not available<br>Type: image/png<br>Size: 10720 bytes<br>Desc: image001.png<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/0abcb2c8/attachment-0001.png" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/0abcb2c8/attachment-0001.png</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 4<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:46:26 -0600<br>From: Scott Kee <<a href="mailto:SKee@cmsstl.com">SKee@cmsstl.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] admin activity log<br>
To: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:5A344813F87C4B4AB15C8753DC56FD6A1B8DA93EFF@CMSMAIL.Spectrumhealth.com">5A344813F87C4B4AB15C8753DC56FD6A1B8DA93EFF@CMSMAIL.Spectrumhealth.com</a>><br>
<br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>I have several admin users and someone accidently put extra Prefix DN on the remote Gateway yesterday. This incident made site to go down for at least couple hours before we found the issue.<br>
Per Cisco TAC, there is no way of tracking user activity in the CUCM. Does anyone know third party tool that does the user activity log in the CUCM? I have CUCM 6.1.<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/ab734307/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/ab734307/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 5<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:23:09 -0500 (EST)<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] admin activity log<br>
To: Scott Kee <<a href="mailto:SKee@cmsstl.com">SKee@cmsstl.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:827877579.3937941232486589753.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca">827877579.3937941232486589753.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>I've always been meaning to evaluate the Arcana product. They said that this does audit logging, but not sure if the changes have to happen through their interface or not.<br>
<br><a href="http://www2.arcananet.com/Prods/default.aspx" target="_blank">http://www2.arcananet.com/Prods/default.aspx</a><br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Scott Kee" <<a href="mailto:SKee@cmsstl.com">SKee@cmsstl.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:46:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] admin activity log<br><br><br><br><br>I have several admin users and someone accidently put extra Prefix DN on the remote Gateway yesterday. This incident made site to go down for at least couple hours before we found the issue.<br>
<br>Per Cisco TAC, there is no way of tracking user activity in the CUCM. Does anyone know third party tool that does the user activity log in the CUCM? I have CUCM 6.1.<br><br><br><br>Thanks,<br><br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/af69a0e8/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/af69a0e8/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 6<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:34:50 -0800 (PST)<br>From: Ahmad Alkam <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:327788.5061.qm@web59416.mail.ac4.yahoo.com">327788.5061.qm@web59416.mail.ac4.yahoo.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>Dears,<br><br>I have call manager 7,0 and one E1 (30 channels) connected to cisco 2801 voice gateway, can i run two welcome message on this call messanger.<br>for example: when i dial 222222 from PSTN i get welcome message 1.<br>
and when call 222221 from PSTN i get welcome message 2.<br><br>Thansk,<br>Ahmad<br><br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/ccb39f7c/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/ccb39f7c/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 7<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:41:55 -0500 (EST)<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br>
To: Ahmad Alkam <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:1691720430.3952581232487715897.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca">1691720430.3952581232487715897.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Yes, that's not a problem. For example, with MGCP you would simply create a translation pattern. With H323 you would create a PLAR configuration.<br><br>---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Ahmad Alkam" <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:34:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br><br><br><br>Dears,<br><br>I have call manager 7,0 and one E1 (30 channels) connected to cisco 2801 voice gateway, can i run two welcome message on this call messanger.<br>
for example: when i dial 222222 from PSTN i get welcome message 1.<br>and when call 222221 from PSTN i get welcome message 2.<br><br>Thansk,<br>Ahmad<br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/b1a9cb95/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/b1a9cb95/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 8<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:48:46 -0800 (PST)<br>From: Ahmad Alkam <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:804289.97132.qm@web59413.mail.ac4.yahoo.com">804289.97132.qm@web59413.mail.ac4.yahoo.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Hi Lelio<br><br>Thansk for assistance, you mean when i config E1 on call manager i can create channels for first group (Aotu attend 1) and another channels for second group (Auto Attend 2) and create translation pattern for that.<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>?Ahmad<br><br><br><br><br>________________________________<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>To: Ahmad Alkam <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:41:55 PM<br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br><br><br>Yes, that's not a problem. For example, with MGCP you would simply create a translation pattern. With H323 you would create a PLAR configuration.<br>
<br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Ahmad Alkam" <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:34:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br><br><br>Dears,<br><br>I have call manager 7,0 and one E1 (30 channels) connected to cisco 2801 voice gateway, can i run two welcome message on this call messanger.<br>
for example: when i dial 222222 from PSTN i get welcome message 1.<br>and when call 222221 from PSTN i get welcome message 2.<br><br>Thansk,<br>Ahmad<br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/14458e6f/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/14458e6f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 9<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:57:22 -0500 (EST)<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br>
To: Ahmad Alkam <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:1881736924.3963531232488642004.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca">1881736924.3963531232488642004.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Not necessarily. What channels an inbound number uses on an E1/T1 is external to CallManager as far as I know. It has more to do with your service provider.<br><br>
In CallManager (for MGCP) you would assign your E1 gateway a calling search space that can reach the partition in which your autoattendant number translation would exist.<br><br>For H323, it requires a bit more work and others on this list have more experience with that.<br>
<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Ahmad Alkam" <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:48:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br>
<br><br><br>Hi Lelio<br><br>Thansk for assistance, you mean when i config E1 on call manager i can create channels for first group (Aotu attend 1) and another channels for second group (Auto Attend 2) and create translation pattern for that.<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Ahmad<br><br><br><br><br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>To: Ahmad Alkam <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:41:55 PM<br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br><br><br>Yes, that's not a problem. For example, with MGCP you would simply create a translation pattern. With H323 you would create a PLAR configuration.<br>
<br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Ahmad Alkam" <<a href="mailto:alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com">alkam.ahmad@yahoo.com</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:34:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Two welcome message on call manager7.0<br><br><br><br>Dears,<br><br>I have call manager 7,0 and one E1 (30 channels) connected to cisco 2801 voice gateway, can i run two welcome message on this call messanger.<br>
for example: when i dial 222222 from PSTN i get welcome message 1.<br>and when call 222221 from PSTN i get welcome message 2.<br><br>Thansk,<br>Ahmad<br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/8c8ff567/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/8c8ff567/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 10<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:29:42 -0800<br>From: Scott Voll <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IPCCX 5 on VMWare ESX<br>
To: Sean Walberg <<a href="mailto:sean@ertw.com">sean@ertw.com</a>><br>Cc: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:f84a38d30901201429s48bc93c3r8fa5af533082424f@mail.gmail.com">f84a38d30901201429s48bc93c3r8fa5af533082424f@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>so long as you have enough ports I wouldn't worry about testing scripts on<br>your production box. I do it all the time. Just setup a new trigger / cti<br>ports / etc and test that way. then when your ready to move it to<br>
production you just change the production script to the new one.<br><br>FWIW<br><br>Scott<br><br>On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Sean Walberg <<a href="mailto:sean@ertw.com">sean@ertw.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>> I'm trying to get IPCCX5 running under VMWare ESX. My server guys handed<br>
> off a Win2K3 "Standard Edition" VM that isn't part of the domain..<br>><br>> I added a couple of registry keys, per a previous post, to make the OS look<br>> like it was the Cisco Appliance.<br>
><br>> I installed from the "Cisco Unified Contact Center Express/IP IVR" CD.<br>> Initially I had problems which I tracked down to AV being on the server,<br>> which I've since removed, wiped out Java and CRS, and reinstalled.<br>
><br>> CRS seems to install fine (that is, without errors), I reboot, but can't<br>> get to /appadmin. IE gives me a "The page cannot be displayed" and FF just<br>> gives me a white screen.<br>><br>
> Poking around the MCVD logs I see:<br>><br>> 107: Jan 19 14:47:48.765 CST<br>> %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION:com.cisco.config.ConfigException:<br>> ClusterProfileInfo::Cannot update profile.ini; nested exception is:<br>
> 108: Jan 19 14:47:48.765 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION:<br>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\PROGRA~1\wfavvid\ClusterData\profile.ini<br>> (Access is denied)<br>> 109: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>
> com.cisco.config.impl.ClusterProfileInfo.updateProfileIni(ClusterProfileInfo.java:544)<br>> 110: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>> com.cisco.config.impl.ClusterProfileInfo.removeIpAddress(ClusterProfileInfo.java:389)<br>
> 111: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>> com.cisco.bootstrap.impl.BootstrapManagerImpl.initConfig(BootstrapManagerImpl.java:913)<br>> 112: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>
> com.cisco.bootstrap.impl.BootstrapManagerImpl.init(BootstrapManagerImpl.java:418)<br>> 113: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>> com.cisco.manager.Manager.init(Manager.java:107)<br>
> 114: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>> com.cisco.manager.ManagerBridge.init(ManagerBridge.java:72)<br>> 115: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>> com.cisco.manager.impl.ManagerManagerImpl.initBootstrapMgr(ManagerManagerImpl.java:2562)<br>
> 116: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>> com.cisco.manager.impl.ManagerManagerImpl.bootstrapInit(ManagerManagerImpl.java:1901)<br>> 117: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>
> com.cisco.manager.impl.ManagerManagerImpl.access$1600(ManagerManagerImpl.java:184)<br>> 118: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: at<br>> com.cisco.manager.impl.ManagerManagerImpl$2.run(ManagerManagerImpl.java:799)<br>
> 119: Jan 19 14:47:48.796 CST %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-3-EXCEPTION: nested<br>> stack trace is:<br>><br>> I'm not sure what to make of that, the permissions look the same as my<br>> production system and the application was able to copy profile.ini to<br>
> profile.bak. Just for kicks I granted full control to everyone but the<br>> problem persists.<br>><br>> Any advice on where to look, or a better installation method? We have<br>> support on the production systems, but I don't think this is an appropriate<br>
> thing to call about. And I'm getting nervous developing scripts on our<br>> production cluster. :)<br>><br>> Thanks<br>><br>> Sean<br>><br>> --<br>> Sean Walberg <<a href="mailto:sean@ertw.com">sean@ertw.com</a>> <a href="http://ertw.com/" target="_blank">http://ertw.com/</a><br>
><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/a385a7b8/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/a385a7b8/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 11<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:57:21 -0500<br>From: Wes Sisk <<a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] admin activity log<br>
To: Scott Kee <<a href="mailto:SKee@cmsstl.com">SKee@cmsstl.com</a>><br>Cc: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:497656D1.9040804@cisco.com">497656D1.9040804@cisco.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"<br><br>download the cisco tomcat logs, you can see who made the change. it<br>
will help to know the pkid of the remote gateway. it is presented in the<br>URL when you are viewing the gateway config in ccmadmin.<br><br>/wes<br><br>On Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:46:26 PM, Scott Kee <<a href="mailto:SKee@cmsstl.com">SKee@cmsstl.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>> I have several admin users and someone accidently put extra Prefix DN<br>> on the remote Gateway yesterday. This incident made site to go down<br>> for at least couple hours before we found the issue.<br>
><br>> Per Cisco TAC, there is no way of tracking user activity in the CUCM.<br>> Does anyone know third party tool that does the user activity log in<br>> the CUCM? I have CUCM 6.1.<br>><br>><br>><br>
> Thanks,<br>><br>><br>><br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/bed23bd4/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/bed23bd4/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 12<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:31:51 -0500<br>From: Jason Burns <<a href="mailto:burns.jason@gmail.com">burns.jason@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Click to call 7.0 and CCM 6.1(2)<br>
To: "Ruben Montes (Europe)" <<a href="mailto:Ruben.Montes@eu.didata.com">Ruben.Montes@eu.didata.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:78d9bfc20901201531ld34ac0ej1813db3c4b88e4bf@mail.gmail.com">78d9bfc20901201531ld34ac0ej1813db3c4b88e4bf@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>
Ruben,<br><br>Do you have any other WebDialer based applications in your system?<br><br>The WebDialer process is limited to 2 calls per second. This shouldn't be a<br>problem though unless you're running something else that uses WebDialer<br>
heavily.<br><br>Getting that error message when you log in is even more interesting.<br><br>Can you make sure the IP Phone Authentication URL is correct on the<br>Enterprise Parameters web page? Also make sure that the phone has "Allow<br>
Control of device via CTI" enabled and is associated with the correct user<br>from the User config page.<br><br>On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Ruben Montes (Europe) <<br><a href="mailto:Ruben.Montes@eu.didata.com">Ruben.Montes@eu.didata.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>> Hello,<br>><br>> Customer wants to run Click to Call application. We have configured<br>> everything following the installation guide. When we try to login using<br>> the user and password, we get the following error:<br>
><br>> The service is overloaded. Retry the call.<br>> If the problem persists, please contact your phone administrator<br>><br>> Any help would be appreciated.<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>><br>> Ruben<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/2c3d9703/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/2c3d9703/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 13<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:17:05 -0500<br>From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] admin activity log<br>
To: "Scott Kee" <<a href="mailto:SKee@cmsstl.com">SKee@cmsstl.com</a>>, <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00D5C0F7D@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Put a Proxy Server in front of CCMAdmin, keyboard loggers that provide<br>screen shots on employees computers <grin><br><br><br><br>I would setup MLA with reduced rights for daily usage with a admin<br>
account with more rights to be used during change control hours. Goes<br>with concept that you are not logged in as local administrator but use<br>Run As or SU when needed -jason<br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Scott Kee<br>Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:46 PM<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] admin activity log<br><br><br><br>I have several admin users and someone accidently put extra Prefix DN on<br>the remote Gateway yesterday. This incident made site to go down for at<br>least couple hours before we found the issue.<br>
<br>Per Cisco TAC, there is no way of tracking user activity in the CUCM.<br>Does anyone know third party tool that does the user activity log in the<br>CUCM? I have CUCM 6.1.<br><br><br><br>Thanks,<br><br><br><br><br><br>
<br>-----------------------------------------<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>from your computer. Thank you.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/6579af59/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/6579af59/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 14<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:23:17 -0600<br>From: Nasser Khwaja <<a href="mailto:nkhwaja@gmail.com">nkhwaja@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Please remove me from this list - Thanks<br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:23435d3d0901201823t9dbf7d2p9b0e09ceb4ce01e0@mail.gmail.com">23435d3d0901201823t9dbf7d2p9b0e09ceb4ce01e0@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/1c8ab0e9/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/1c8ab0e9/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 15<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:41:25 -0500 (EST)<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Please remove me from this list - Thanks<br>
To: Nasser Khwaja <<a href="mailto:nkhwaja@gmail.com">nkhwaja@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:981626753.4102571232505685549.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca">981626753.4102571232505685549.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>The list is self managed....please follow the link at the bottom of each message.<br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Nasser Khwaja" <<a href="mailto:nkhwaja@gmail.com">nkhwaja@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:23:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Please remove me from this list - Thanks<br>
<br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/7a48f531/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/7a48f531/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 16<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:50:02 -0600<br>From: Richard Humphries <<a href="mailto:Richardh@aos5.com">Richardh@aos5.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] configuring Cube mtp supporting g729<br>
To: "'James Grace'" <<a href="mailto:grace.jd@gmail.com">grace.jd@gmail.com</a>>, CiscosupportUpuck<br> <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:B34DD3C35B0A634C91C433C39CC09253029BC87CB6@KSAOS5MAILBOX01.aos5.com">B34DD3C35B0A634C91C433C39CC09253029BC87CB6@KSAOS5MAILBOX01.aos5.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>Here you go, it includes a conference bridge too as I was too lazy to edit it out.<br><br>Define the MTP in IOS.<br>voice-card 0<br>dspfarm<br>dsp services dspfarm<br>!enables onboard DSPs to act as DSP services. These resources can be used for<br>
conference bridges, transcoding, and voice termination.<br>!<br>sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0 !gi0/0 must have IP connectivity to UC Manager<br>sccp ccm 192.168.0.6 identifier 2 priority 2 version 5.0.1<br>sccp ccm 192.168.0.4 identifier 5 priority 1 version 5.0.1<br>
!match UC Manager vers as close as possible to what is deployed<br>!each UC Manager server in the CallManager Group should be configured here<br>!identifier is locally significant<br>!priority should match the CallManager Group priority<br>
sccp<br>! this single "sccp" command enables SCCP protocol on this router<br>!<br>sccp ccm group 10<br>associate ccm 5 priority 1<br>associate ccm 2 priority 2<br>associate profile 10 register RTP001193484810 !MTP resource<br>
associate profile 12 register CON001193484810 !Conference resource<br>!The value immediately following "register" is what the "name" that IOS uses to<br>register this resource to UC Manager. It MUST match (case-sensitive) to what is<br>
defined in UC Manager.<br>!<br>dspfarm profile 12 conference<br>description conference bridge<br>codec g711ulaw<br>codec g711alaw<br>codec g729ar8<br>codec g729abr8<br>codec g729r8<br>codec g729br8<br>maximum sessions 10<br>
associate application SCCP<br>!<br>dspfarm profile 10 mtp<br>codec g729r8 !codec must match codec desired/negotiated for voice call<br>maximum sessions software 12<br>!Notice "software" in this command. This means that this MTP resource is IOS softwarebased,<br>
not DSPs. IOS will allow you to configure up to 500 sessions; however, you need<br>to consider the practical limits of the IOS hardware platform (i.e., CPU and memory).<br>This number should match the number of trunks the customer is purchasing.<br>
associate application SCCP<br>Next, define the IOS MTP resource in UC Manager.<br><br><br><br>________________________________<br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of James Grace<br>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:36 AM<br>To: CiscosupportUpuck<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] configuring Cube mtp supporting g729<br><br>what the configs for dspfarm profile XX mtp that support g729. do anybody know.<br><br>
--<br>James Grace<br>CCVP CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA<br>System Engineer / Consultant<br>Email: <a href="mailto:grace.jd@gmail.com">grace.jd@gmail.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:grace.jd@gmail.com">grace.jd@gmail.com</a>><br>
<br>MSN IM: <a href="mailto:grace.jd@gmail.com">grace.jd@gmail.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:grace.jd@gmail.com">grace.jd@gmail.com</a>><br><br><br><br>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, be aware that any review, copying, printing, distribution, use or disclosure of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and contact sender immediately by Reply e-mail, or by calling 913-307-2300, so that our address records can be corrected.<br>
<br>Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might negatively affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way in the event that such a virus or defect exists.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/1ccfb429/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/1ccfb429/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 17<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:33:07 -0500 (EST)<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] ccmadmin and ccmuser pages....port numbers<br>
To: cisco-voip voyp list <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:488439307.4123711232508787190.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca">488439307.4123711232508787190.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Can anyone confirm whether ccmadmin and ccmuserpages run on the same TCP ports in v5,6,7?<br><br>And whether you can modify these port numbers?<br><br><br><br>---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/6e5e512b/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/6e5e512b/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 18<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:09:27 -0700<br>From: "Mark Holloway" <<a href="mailto:mh@markholloway.com">mh@markholloway.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Quietest router for CME<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID: <000001c97b7e$0dda35f0$298ea1d0$@com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>What is the quietest router possible that supports CME? I want to run CME<br>
at my house but prefer to keep the fan noise to a minimum.<br><br><br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Mark<br><br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/adadcdb5/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/adadcdb5/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 19<br>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:29:02 -0500<br>From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Quietest router for CME<br>
To: "Mark Holloway" <<a href="mailto:mh@markholloway.com">mh@markholloway.com</a>>,<br> <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00D5C1020@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Turn your AC way down, and the fan on a 1841 will run at low speed. I<br>recall the temperature sensor in environmental monitor adjusts fan speed<br>just like my laptop does. Stick it in a closed cabinet and it should run<br>
at high.<br><br><br><br>I want to say the old 1751V fan rarely ran and you could disconnect it's<br>plug from chassis, but you don't want such an old router for CME.<br><br><br><br>You could also cut the fan wires and let it run hot.<br>
<br><br><br><a href="https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/access/2800/hardware/notes/fan2800.html" target="_blank">https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/access/2800/hardware/notes/fan2<br>800.html</a><br><br><br><br>
<a href="http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/docs/routers/access/1800/1841/hardware/installation/guide/18over.html#wp36556" target="_blank">http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/docs/routers/access/1800/1841/hardware<br>/installation/guide/18over.html#wp36556</a><br>
<br>Chassis Ventilation<br><br>An internal three-speed fan provides chassis cooling. An onboard<br>temperature sensor controls the fan speed. The fan is always on when<br>power is applied to the router. Under most conditions, the fan operates<br>
at the slowest speed to conserve power and reduce fan noise. It operates<br>at the higher speeds when necessary under conditions of higher ambient<br>temperature.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway<br>Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:09 PM<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Quietest router for CME<br><br><br><br>What is the quietest router possible that supports CME? I want to run<br>CME at my house but prefer to keep the fan noise to a minimum.<br><br><br><br>Thanks,<br>
<br>Mark<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>-----------------------------------------<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>from your computer. Thank you.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/8e154fbc/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090120/8e154fbc/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 20<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:19:25 +0100<br>From: <a href="mailto:rj.e@gmx.de">rj.e@gmx.de</a><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX Node Manager fails after SQL2000<br> installation<br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20090121081925.310520@gmx.net">20090121081925.310520@gmx.net</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br><br>I'm doing a HA UCCX7 setup. Installation of the UCCX Software was OK.<br>After I installed SQL2000 on the second node then the UCCX Node Manager keeps restarting on the second node.<br>Any ideas what could be wrong?<br>
Additional hint: I started to set up the first node having only a non-HA license. But after adding the HA license there is still the same problem. Maybe I have to start the complete installation from the beginning?<br><br>
Reinhold<br><br>Log file shows that:<br><br>194: Jan 20 17:00:36.516 CET %MCVD-BOOTSTRAP_MGR-7-UNK:BootstrapManagerImpl.addListener():<br>BootstrapListener added: com.cisco.license.impl.LicenseImpl$5@2d13c1<br>195: Jan 20 17:00:36.578 CET %MCVD-LIB_LICENSE-3-LICENSE_CONFIG_UNAVAILABLE_ERROR:License<br>
configure unavailable or retrieve error:<br>Exception=com.cisco.config.ConfigNotFoundException: Query returned zero results<br>196: Jan 20 17:00:36.578 CET<br>%MCVD-LIB_LICENSE-3-EXCEPTION:com.cisco.config.ConfigNotFoundException: Query returned<br>
zero results<br><br>--<br>Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger geh?rt? Der kann`s mit allen: <a href="http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger" target="_blank">http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger</a><br><br><br>------------------------------<br>
<br>Message: 21<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:40:24 +0100<br>From: Nicolas <<a href="mailto:yogzgo@gmail.com">yogzgo@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Meeting Place Express, Can't send notification<br> email<br>
To: Cisco VoIP Mailling List <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:7f9be1e20901210240o4883cf18l27956b6be652f21b@mail.gmail.com">7f9be1e20901210240o4883cf18l27956b6be652f21b@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Hello list !<br><br>I just install a MPX 2.1.2 and everything is working fine.<br>I have a small problem about email notification.<br>MPX is not able to send any email.<br>
<br>I configured both :<br>- An exchange server, the test button say that it's working<br>- An smtp server<br>But it still doesn't work.<br><br>MPX give me those errors :<br>Major 21001f 1 01/21/2009 11:01 01/21/2009 11:01 0 34 POC: Retries<br>
failed, Check Mail server configuration<br><br>Any idea ?<br><br>Thank you<br>Nicolas<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/f282afad/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/f282afad/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 22<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:11:24 -0500<br>From: Ed Leatherman <<a href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com">ealeatherman@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] I've seen it all now...<br>
To: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:94a1afde0901210511w2d873c23kee4dd69d851f290@mail.gmail.com">94a1afde0901210511w2d873c23kee4dd69d851f290@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br> Incident Description: User has a Cisco 7960 that has "blown up". When he<br>walked into his office he smelled smoke and the display was blackened in one<br>
corner. He works for Facilities.<br><br>Last time I had a bad phone from these guys, they had dropped the handset,<br>and magically the wires connecting the speaker were sticking out the side of<br>the handset.<br><br>--<br>
Ed Leatherman<br>Assistant Director, Voice Services<br>West Virginia University<br>Telecommunications and Network Operations<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/02e8735f/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/02e8735f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 23<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:23:41 -0500<br>From: "Biffle, Gerrad" <<a href="mailto:Gerrad.Biffle@greensboro-nc.gov">Gerrad.Biffle@greensboro-nc.gov</a>><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX Historical Reporting client install<br>To: "cisco-voip voyp list" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:038ECED6C286904CA93C8A76ABC45DF5164F2BCA@VENUS.greensboronc.org">038ECED6C286904CA93C8A76ABC45DF5164F2BCA@VENUS.greensboronc.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Long story short - we upgraded to UCCX version 5.0.2 on Jan 10th and I'm<br>trying to install the Historical Reporting client. Every time I've<br>tried to install - at about 90% completion - I go to the BSOD (Blue<br>
Screen Of Death) with a "Bad Pool Header" error message. Anybody run<br>into this before? Any ideas to try before opening a TAC case?<br><br>Thanks in advance for the help!<br><br>Gerrad<br><br>=======================================================<br>
Please note that email sent to and from this address is subject<br>to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to<br>third parties.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/341ffb9f/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/341ffb9f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 24<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:46:05 -0600<br>From: Robert Kulagowski <<a href="mailto:rkulagow@gmail.com">rkulagow@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] What could cause a "buzzing" rather than call<br>
progress tones?<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4977271D.4090703@gmail.com">4977271D.4090703@gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>Over in the U.K., I've got an Adtran Atlas 830 terminating two PRIs from<br>BT and sending 2 PRIs to a 2851 VGW running MGCP. CM is 4.1.3. A 3rd<br>PRI is generated to a Codian 3241.<br><br>Outbound calls are generating a "buzzing" sound rather than actual call<br>
progress tones (like Ring, busy, etc). I called Adtran tech support and<br>we went over the configuration of the Adtran. From the logs, the Adtran<br>is just passing ISDN setup messages over the D channel like it's<br>
supposed to, and the audio path isn't established until the called party<br>goes off-hook.<br><br>Here's the traces from the Adtran:<br><br>|1|3| is the E-1 to the 2851. So here's the Adtran receiving an<br>outbound call setup from the 2851 to the PSTN<br>
<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:44 Nr:36<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 05 SETUP<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - A1 SENDING COMPLETE Len=0<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 04 BEARER CAPABILITY Len=3<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 80 Xfer Cap.:SPEECH<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 90 Xfer Rate:64k<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A3 Layer 1:G.711 A-Law<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A9 Primary Rate<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Pref/Excl:EXCLUSIVE<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 9f Channel:31<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 6C CALLING PARTY # Len=8<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 00 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A1 Presentation:RESTRICTED<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ph.# 504955<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 70 CALLED PARTY # Len=14<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 80 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ph.# 0013123963808<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|3|Call to ATLAS:'0013123963808'.<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:36 Nr:45<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 02 CALL_PROC<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A9 Primary Rate<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Pref/Excl:EXCLUSIVE<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 9f Channel:31<br>
<br>|1|2| is the PRI to BT<br><br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:21 Nr:24<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 05 SETUP<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - A1 SENDING COMPLETE Len=0<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 04 BEARER CAPABILITY Len=3<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 80 Xfer Cap.:SPEECH<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 90 Xfer Rate:64k<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A3 Layer 1:G.711 A-Law<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A1 Primary Rate<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Pref/Excl:PREFERRED<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 9f Channel:31<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 6C CALLING PARTY # Len=8<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 00 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A1 Presentation:RESTRICTED<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ph.# 504955<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 70 CALLED PARTY # Len=14<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 80 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ph.# 0013123963808<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Dialing '0013123963808' from '504955'.<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:Switchboard|1|3|0013123963808 Pri. accepted: slot<br>1, port 2<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:24 Nr:22<br>
13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 02 CALL_PROC<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A9 Primary Rate<br>
13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Pref/Excl:EXCLUSIVE<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br>
13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 81 Channel:1<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Gate opened to name by Proceeding Msg.<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>
13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:25 Nr:22<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 01 ALERTING<br>
13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 1E PROGRESS INDICATOR Len=2<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 84 Location:RLN<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 82 Description:DEST. NOT ISDN<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Call to '0013123963808' ringing.<br>
13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:37 Nr:45<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 01 ALERTING<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br><br><br>So up to now this is all strictly D-channel ISDN signalling; it's not<br>until the CONNECT that we get a audio path. During this ALERTING phase<br>the person who made the outbound call is hearing a buzz rather than<br>
"RING RING" cadence.<br><br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:26 Nr:22<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 07 CONNECT<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Call to '0013123963808' connected.<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|3|Call to '0013123963808' connected.<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:22 Nr:27<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 0F CONNECT_ACK<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:38 Nr:45<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 07 CONNECT<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:45 Nr:39<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 0F CONNECT_ACK<br><br>And now there's a bi-directional audio path which has been ACKed by both<br>
the Adtran and the Cisco.<br><br>Adtran TAC is saying that it's not them. Thoughts?<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 25<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:13:47 -0500<br>From: Ryan Ratliff <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] What could cause a "buzzing" rather than<br> call progress tones?<br>To: Robert Kulagowski <<a href="mailto:rkulagow@gmail.com">rkulagow@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:B405410D-DA93-43B8-931A-87C1B3747A15@cisco.com">B405410D-DA93-43B8-931A-87C1B3747A15@cisco.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";<br>
DelSp="yes"<br><br>So the call is looping through the Adtran?<br><br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:25 Nr:22<br>
13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 01 ALERTING<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 1E PROGRESS INDICATOR Len=2<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 84 Location:RLN<br>
13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 82 Description:DEST. NOT ISDN<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Call to '0013123963808' ringing.<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>
13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:37 Nr:45<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 01 ALERTING<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br><br>Here you receive an Alerting message from BT with a PI indicating<br>
that audio should be cut through for ringback in-band. The outbound<br>Alerting to the 2851 is missing this PI, which should cause CM to<br>generate ringback.<br><br>Have you looked to see what CCM thinks it is receiving for this<br>
call? It should be pretty clear whether the phone is being told to<br>play a tone (insideRing, etc) or has audio set up to the gateway<br>(OpenReceiveChannel, etc).<br><br><br>-Ryan<br><br>On Jan 21, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Robert Kulagowski wrote:<br>
<br>Over in the U.K., I've got an Adtran Atlas 830 terminating two PRIs<br>from BT and sending 2 PRIs to a 2851 VGW running MGCP. CM is 4.1.3.<br>A 3rd PRI is generated to a Codian 3241.<br><br>Outbound calls are generating a "buzzing" sound rather than actual<br>
call progress tones (like Ring, busy, etc). I called Adtran tech<br>support and we went over the configuration of the Adtran. From the<br>logs, the Adtran is just passing ISDN setup messages over the D<br>channel like it's supposed to, and the audio path isn't established<br>
until the called party goes off-hook.<br><br>Here's the traces from the Adtran:<br><br>|1|3| is the E-1 to the 2851. So here's the Adtran receiving an<br>outbound call setup from the 2851 to the PSTN<br><br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:44 Nr:36<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 05 SETUP<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - A1 SENDING COMPLETE Len=0<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 04 BEARER CAPABILITY Len=3<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 80 Xfer Cap.:SPEECH<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 90 Xfer Rate:64k<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A3 Layer 1:G.711 A-Law<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A9 Primary Rate<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Pref/Excl:EXCLUSIVE<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 9f Channel:31<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 6C CALLING PARTY # Len=8<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 00 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A1 Presentation:RESTRICTED<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ph.# 504955<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 70 CALLED PARTY # Len=14<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 80 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ph.# 0013123963808<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|3|Call to ATLAS:'0013123963808'.<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:36 Nr:45<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 02 CALL_PROC<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A9 Primary Rate<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Pref/Excl:EXCLUSIVE<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 9f Channel:31<br><br>|1|2| is the PRI to BT<br><br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:21 Nr:24<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 05 SETUP<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - A1 SENDING COMPLETE Len=0<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 04 BEARER CAPABILITY Len=3<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 80 Xfer Cap.:SPEECH<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 90 Xfer Rate:64k<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A3 Layer 1:G.711 A-Law<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A1 Primary Rate<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Pref/Excl:PREFERRED<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 9f Channel:31<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 6C CALLING PARTY # Len=8<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 00 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A1 Presentation:RESTRICTED<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ph.# 504955<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 70 CALLED PARTY # Len=14<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 80 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br>
13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ph.# 0013123963808<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Dialing '0013123963808' from '504955'.<br> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:Switchboard|1|3|0013123963808 Pri. accepted:<br>
slot 1, port 2<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:24 Nr:22<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>
13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 02 CALL_PROC<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A9 Primary Rate<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br>
13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Pref/Excl:EXCLUSIVE<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br>
13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 81 Channel:1<br> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Gate opened to name by Proceeding Msg.<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>
13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:25 Nr:22<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 01 ALERTING<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 1E PROGRESS INDICATOR Len=2<br>
13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 84 Location:RLN<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 82 Description:DEST. NOT ISDN<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Call to '0013123963808' ringing.<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br>
13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:37 Nr:45<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 01 ALERTING<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br><br><br>So up to now this is all strictly D-channel ISDN signalling; it's not<br>until the CONNECT that we get a audio path. During this ALERTING<br>phase the person who made the outbound call is hearing a buzz rather<br>
than "RING RING" cadence.<br><br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:26 Nr:22<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 07 CONNECT<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Call to '0013123963808' connected.<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|3|Call to '0013123963808' connected.<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:22 Nr:27<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 0F CONNECT_ACK<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:38 Nr:45<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 07 CONNECT<br>
13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:45 Nr:39<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 0F CONNECT_ACK<br>
<br>And now there's a bi-directional audio path which has been ACKed by<br>both the Adtran and the Cisco.<br><br>Adtran TAC is saying that it's not them. Thoughts?<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/d160d280/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/d160d280/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 26<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:18:43 -0600<br>From: James Edmondson <<a href="mailto:biged7600@gmail.com">biged7600@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] What could cause a "buzzing" rather than<br>
call progress tones?<br>To: Robert Kulagowski <<a href="mailto:rkulagow@gmail.com">rkulagow@gmail.com</a>>, <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:d35a6baf0901210718g3f38fb04v48bb8e7546579b24@mail.gmail.com">d35a6baf0901210718g3f38fb04v48bb8e7546579b24@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br><br>I had a smiliar issue awhile back and it ended up being and ios issue.<br>We heard buzzing instead of ringback. However it was a H323 vgw not<br>mgcp. What ios are you running?<br>
<br>On 1/21/09, Robert Kulagowski <<a href="mailto:rkulagow@gmail.com">rkulagow@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Over in the U.K., I've got an Adtran Atlas 830 terminating two PRIs from<br>> BT and sending 2 PRIs to a 2851 VGW running MGCP. CM is 4.1.3. A 3rd<br>
> PRI is generated to a Codian 3241.<br>><br>> Outbound calls are generating a "buzzing" sound rather than actual call<br>> progress tones (like Ring, busy, etc). I called Adtran tech support and<br>
> we went over the configuration of the Adtran. From the logs, the Adtran<br>> is just passing ISDN setup messages over the D channel like it's<br>> supposed to, and the audio path isn't established until the called party<br>
> goes off-hook.<br>><br>> Here's the traces from the Adtran:<br>><br>> |1|3| is the E-1 to the 2851. So here's the Adtran receiving an<br>> outbound call setup from the 2851 to the PSTN<br>><br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:44 Nr:36<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 05 SETUP<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - A1 SENDING COMPLETE Len=0<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 04 BEARER CAPABILITY Len=3<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 80 Xfer Cap.:SPEECH<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 90 Xfer Rate:64k<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A3 Layer 1:G.711 A-Law<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A9 Primary Rate<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Pref/Excl:EXCLUSIVE<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 9f Channel:31<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 6C CALLING PARTY # Len=8<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 00 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A1 Presentation:RESTRICTED<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ph.# 504955<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 70 CALLED PARTY # Len=14<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 80 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ph.# 0013123963808<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|3|Call to ATLAS:'0013123963808'.<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:36 Nr:45<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 02 CALL_PROC<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| A9 Primary Rate<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Pref/Excl:EXCLUSIVE<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|3| 9f Channel:31<br>
><br>> |1|2| is the PRI to BT<br>><br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:21 Nr:24<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 05 SETUP<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - A1 SENDING COMPLETE Len=0<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 04 BEARER CAPABILITY Len=3<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 80 Xfer Cap.:SPEECH<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 90 Xfer Rate:64k<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A3 Layer 1:G.711 A-Law<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A1 Primary Rate<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Pref/Excl:PREFERRED<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 9f Channel:31<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 6C CALLING PARTY # Len=8<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 00 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A1 Presentation:RESTRICTED<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ph.# 504955<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 70 CALLED PARTY # Len=14<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 80 Numb. Type:UNKNOWN<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Numb. Plan:UNKNOWN<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ph.# 0013123963808<br>
> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Dialing '0013123963808' from '504955'.<br>> 13:22:36 lon [ADT]:Switchboard|1|3|0013123963808 Pri. accepted: slot<br>> 1, port 2<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>
> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:24 Nr:22<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 02 CALL_PROC<br>
> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 18 CHANNEL ID Len=3<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| A9 Primary Rate<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Intfc ID:IMPLICIT<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Pref/Excl:EXCLUSIVE<br>
> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| D-Chan Indicated:NO<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Chan. Sel:FOLLOWS<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 83 Numb/Map:NUMBER<br>> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 81 Channel:1<br>
> 13:22:37 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Gate opened to name by Proceeding Msg.<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:25 Nr:22<br>
> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 01 ALERTING<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 1E PROGRESS INDICATOR Len=2<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 84 Location:RLN<br>
> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 82 Description:DEST. NOT ISDN<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Call to '0013123963808' ringing.<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>
> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:37 Nr:45<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 01 ALERTING<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>
><br>><br>> So up to now this is all strictly D-channel ISDN signalling; it's not<br>> until the CONNECT that we get a audio path. During this ALERTING phase<br>> the person who made the outbound call is hearing a buzz rather than<br>
> "RING RING" cadence.<br>><br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:26 Nr:22<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>
> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 07 CONNECT<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Call to '0013123963808' connected.<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|3|Call to '0013123963808' connected.<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>
> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:22 Nr:27<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 0F CONNECT_ACK<br>
> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:38 Nr:45<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>
> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 07 CONNECT<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:R Tei:00<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:45 Nr:39<br>
> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:0017<br>> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 0F CONNECT_ACK<br>><br>> And now there's a bi-directional audio path which has been ACKed by both<br>> the Adtran and the Cisco.<br>
><br>> Adtran TAC is saying that it's not them. Thoughts?<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br><br>--<br>Sent from my mobile device<br><br>James<br><br><br>------------------------------<br>
<br>Message: 27<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:32:46 -0600<br>From: Robert Kulagowski <<a href="mailto:rkulagow@gmail.com">rkulagow@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] What could cause a "buzzing" rather than<br>
call progress tones?<br>To: Ryan Ratliff <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4977401E.4080308@gmail.com">4977401E.4080308@gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>Ryan Ratliff wrote:<br>> So the call is looping through the Adtran?<br>><br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2|Recd = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>
> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Ctl:INFO Ns:25 Nr:22<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| M - 01 ALERTING<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| IE - 1E PROGRESS INDICATOR Len=2<br>
> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 84 Location:RLN<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|2| 82 Description:DEST. NOT ISDN<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:ISDN|1|2|Call to '0013123963808' ringing.<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|==========<br>
> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3|Sent = Sapi:00 C/R:C Tei:00<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Ctl:INFO Ns:37 Nr:45<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| Prot:08 CRL:2 CRV:8017<br>> 13:22:40 lon [ADT]:|1|3| M - 01 ALERTING<br>
> 13:22:42 lon [ADT]:|1|2|==========<br>><br>> Here you receive an Alerting message from BT with a PI indicating that<br>> audio should be cut through for ringback in-band. The outbound Alerting<br>> to the 2851 is missing this PI, which should cause CM to generate ringback.<br>
<br>The ALERTING is coming from BT on 1|2, which the Adtran then sends to<br>the VGW on 1|3<br><br>I can see from this snippet that the message to the VGW is missing the PI.<br><br>><br>> Have you looked to see what CCM thinks it is receiving for this call?<br>
> It should be pretty clear whether the phone is being told to play a<br>> tone (insideRing, etc) or has audio set up to the gateway<br>> (OpenReceiveChannel, etc).<br><br>Which logs would be relevant in this case?<br>
<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 28<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:33:11 -0600<br>From: Robert Kulagowski <<a href="mailto:rkulagow@gmail.com">rkulagow@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] What could cause a "buzzing" rather than<br>
call progress tones?<br>To: James Edmondson <<a href="mailto:biged7600@gmail.com">biged7600@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:49774037.4050201@gmail.com">49774037.4050201@gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>James Edmondson wrote:<br>> I had a smiliar issue awhile back and it ended up being and ios issue.<br>> We heard buzzing instead of ringback. However it was a H323 vgw not<br>
> mgcp. What ios are you running?<br><br>12.4(15)T1<br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 29<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:24:19 -0800<br>From: "Voll, Scott" <<a href="mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org">Scott.Voll@wesd.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection<br>To: Kelemen Zoltan <<a href="mailto:keli@carocomp.ro">keli@carocomp.ro</a>>, Erick Bergquist<br> <<a href="mailto:erickbee@gmail.com">erickbee@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>>, Carlos Ortiz<br> <<a href="mailto:COrtiz@sscincorporated.com">COrtiz@sscincorporated.com</a>>, Chris Clouse <<a href="mailto:Chris.Clouse@cdw.com">Chris.Clouse@cdw.com</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:06D9FD985A42704BB0E8F483ACA3FE2E3EE4EBF914@miranda.wesd.org">06D9FD985A42704BB0E8F483ACA3FE2E3EE4EBF914@miranda.wesd.org</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>correct<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Kelemen Zoltan [mailto:<a href="mailto:keli@carocomp.ro">keli@carocomp.ro</a>]<br>Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 11:47 PM<br>To: Erick Bergquist<br>Cc: Voll, Scott; Cisco VoIPoE List; Carlos Ortiz; Chris Clouse<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection<br><br>Number of voice calls on a E1 is PRI usage, isn't it? The OIDs<br>discussed/used in that thread show DS0 (E1/T1 channels) usage on<br>DS1(E1/T1) ports, so it's independent whether it's E1 or T1.<br>
<br>regards,<br> Zoltan<br><br>Erick Bergquist wrote:<br>> Is the link below still good for getting this PRI info into a cacti<br>> graph? The link is showing E1 information and not info relating to PRI<br>> usage. I'm stumbling around creating my own and finding all the<br>
> correct OIDs so rather use an existing template if there is one.<br>><br>> Thanks.<br>><br>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Voll, Scott <<a href="mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org">Scott.Voll@wesd.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>>> We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> <a href="http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443" target="_blank">http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443</a><br>
>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Scott<br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 30<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:27:42 -0100<br>From: Ant?nio Fragoso <<a href="mailto:Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv">Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv</a>><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Lock IPPHONE 7970 and 7911<br>To: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br> <0B9DBADCC054F343A927FD1BC72C60AB06FA49E57C@exchangemb-srv.baicv.local><br><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Hi Team<br>Does any baody nkow how to lock IPHONE under CallManager ver 6 to be not used for other people to prevent unauthorized Call<br>
Brgds<br><br>Antonio Fragoso<br>[cid:image001.jpg@01C97BDC.CD131050]<br>BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.<br>Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunica?ao<br>Edif?cio Santa Maria, 1? Andar<br>Ch? de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459<br>Santiago, Cabo Verde<br>
Tel.: +238 260 1224/26<br>Fax: +238 262 2810<br><a href="mailto:antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv">antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv">nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv</a>><br><a href="http://www.bancobai.cv/" target="_blank">www.bancobai.cv</a><<a href="http://www.bancobai.ao/" target="_blank">http://www.bancobai.ao/</a>><br>
<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/f577a278/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/f577a278/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: image001.jpg<br>Type: image/jpeg<br>Size: 3305 bytes<br>Desc: image001.jpg<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/f577a278/attachment-0001.jpg" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/f577a278/attachment-0001.jpg</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 31<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:54:29 -0800<br>From: "Michael Dugan" <<a href="mailto:mdugan@pacific.edu">mdugan@pacific.edu</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] 2811 Router with FXS Ports<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:1B58E7972CD6D64BAB275B26BF994C4C022AD448@EXVS1.stk.pacific.edu">1B58E7972CD6D64BAB275B26BF994C4C022AD448@EXVS1.stk.pacific.edu</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Does anyone have a configuration they can share. I have a 2811 with 12<br>FXS ports and I want to configure it as an MGCP gateway. Call Manager<br>version is 6.1.2<br>
<br><br><br>Thanks, Mike<br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/40bf74e7/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090121/40bf74e7/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 32<br>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:57:32 -0600<br>From: Erick Bergquist <<a href="mailto:erickbee@gmail.com">erickbee@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection<br>
To: "Voll, Scott" <<a href="mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org">Scott.Voll@wesd.org</a>><br>Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>>, Carlos Ortiz<br>
<<a href="mailto:COrtiz@sscincorporated.com">COrtiz@sscincorporated.com</a>>, Chris Clouse <<a href="mailto:Chris.Clouse@cdw.com">Chris.Clouse@cdw.com</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:f4445faf0901210857h36666b81tac842da26960e6ca@mail.gmail.com">f4445faf0901210857h36666b81tac842da26960e6ca@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br><br>Ok, my bad. Those work fine. I had a mix of H323/MGCP gateways and<br>wasn't getting anything back on one but it was a MGCP gateway and that<br>MIB doesn't get updated for MGCP PRIs.<br>
<br>Thanks.<br><br>On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Voll, Scott <<a href="mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org">Scott.Voll@wesd.org</a>> wrote:<br>> correct<br>><br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: Kelemen Zoltan [mailto:<a href="mailto:keli@carocomp.ro">keli@carocomp.ro</a>]<br>
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 11:47 PM<br>> To: Erick Bergquist<br>> Cc: Voll, Scott; Cisco VoIPoE List; Carlos Ortiz; Chris Clouse<br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection<br>
><br>> Number of voice calls on a E1 is PRI usage, isn't it? The OIDs<br>> discussed/used in that thread show DS0 (E1/T1 channels) usage on<br>> DS1(E1/T1) ports, so it's independent whether it's E1 or T1.<br>
><br>> regards,<br>> Zoltan<br>><br>> Erick Bergquist wrote:<br>>> Is the link below still good for getting this PRI info into a cacti<br>>> graph? The link is showing E1 information and not info relating to PRI<br>
>> usage. I'm stumbling around creating my own and finding all the<br>>> correct OIDs so rather use an existing template if there is one.<br>>><br>>> Thanks.<br>>><br>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Voll, Scott <<a href="mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org">Scott.Voll@wesd.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>>>> We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> <a href="http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443" target="_blank">http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443</a><br>
>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Scott<br>>>><br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
>><br>><br>><br>><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br>End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 21<br>******************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br>