Hi guys,<br><br>Cisco DOC says, you shud bind ETH0 MAC in CCM for getting license (feature or DLUs).<br><br>Situation1: Only using ETH0 (No fault-tolerance configured)<br>------------------------------------------<br><br>If server's ETH0 physical mac (when it was shipped) is EE:EE:EE:EE , the license will be generated using first ETH0 address. <br>
<br>I have tested this and works.<br><br><br>Situation2: (when fault tolerance is enabled)<br>-=--------------------------------------------------------------<br>Eth0 physical mac : EE:EE:EE:EE<br>Eth1 physical mac : FF:FF:FF:FF<br>
<br>When fault tolerance enabled, the mac on all interface becomes same:<br>i.e<br>eth0: CC:CC:CC:CC<----------this has changed from EE:EE:EE:EE<br>eth1: CC:CC:CC:CC <------this has changed from FF:FF:FF:FF<br>bond0: CC:CC:CC:CC <---------this is created once fault tolderance is enabled.<br>
<br>So in this situation, for licensing purpose - which MAC address should be bonded to make licensing work? and why?<img goomoji="B06" style="margin: 0pt 0.2ex; vertical-align: middle;" src="cid:B06@goomoji.gmail"><img goomoji="B06" style="margin: 0pt 0.2ex; vertical-align: middle;" src="cid:B06@goomoji.gmail"><img goomoji="B06" style="margin: 0pt 0.2ex; vertical-align: middle;" src="cid:B06@goomoji.gmail"><br>
<br>CC:CC:CC:CC or EE:EE:EE:EE ???????????<br><br>I have the gut feeling, that EE:EE:EE:EE (the original hysical hard coded one) MAC shud use for licensing purpose....<br><br>Thanks in advance.<br><br>frog<br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Smile, you'll save someone else's day!<br>Frog<br>