<div>Mayte,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>If you have access to the cli go ahead an create a new web administrator account, and give it a try :)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Cesar Fiestas</div>
<div> </div>
<div>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Mayte Cantillo <<a href="mailto:mayte@fiu.edu">mayte@fiu.edu</a>> wrote:</div>
<p>> We just finished setting up a box on CUCM 6.1.3, and we used a DMA file<br>> to import the database from CUCM 4.2.3 The only change we did when<br>> importing the DMA file was to change the original hostname. We are not<br>
> using DNS in our environment.<br>><br>> On Friday, I was able to log in to the CM admin page fine. Yesterday I<br>> went to upload the license file, and I could not log in anymore. When I try<br>> to log in to the CM admin page, I keep getting a "Database connection<br>
> error". I have this box set up currently in a test environment.<br>><br>> Any light anyone might be able to shed will be appreciated? Not looking<br>> forward to re-do this box but, needs to be finished Wednesday. L<br>
><br>> Thanks!<br>><br>> - Mayte.<br><br></p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:00 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to<br> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net</a><br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. UCCX historical report: DB access (<a href="mailto:rj.e@gmx.de">rj.e@gmx.de</a>)<br>
2. Getting Park functionality from analog devices<br> (Christopher M. Bomba)<br> 3. Re: End of the PBX (Scott Voll)<br> 4. Re: Getting Park functionality from analog devices<br> (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br> 5. Re: End of the PBX (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
6. Re: Getting Park functionality from analog devices (Ryan Ratliff)<br> 7. Re: Getting Park functionality from analog devices<br> (Christopher M. Bomba)<br> 8. Re: End of the PBX (James Buchanan)<br> 9. Re: Upgrade from CUCM 4.2.3 to 6.1.3 (Scott Voll)<br>
10. Re: End of the PBX (Matt Slaga (US))<br> 11. Re: End of the PBX (Jason Aarons (US))<br> 12. Unity problem (Victor Rodriguez)<br> 13. Re: Unity problem (Jason Aarons (US))<br> 14. Re: VG224 and Call boxes (Biffle, Gerrad)<br>
15. IPCC 4 agent (John Botha - I.T)<br> 16. Re: IPCC 4 agent (Tanner Ezell)<br> 17. Re: End of the PBX (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br> 18. Re: Recover AIM-CUE (Carter, Bill)<br> 19. List.xml 7979 7911 Background Image for CallManager<br>
(Ant?nio Fragoso)<br> 20. Re: End of the PBX (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br> 21. Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7 (c3voip)<br> 22. Re: IPCC 4 agent (Johnny)<br> 23. Re: List.xml 7979 7911 Background Image for CallManager<br> (Jack Martin)<br>
24. Re: End of the PBX (Matt Slaga (US))<br> 25. Re: Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7 (Scott Voll)<br> 26. Re: Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7 (Matthew Loraditch)<br> 27. Re: Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7 (James Buchanan)<br>
28. Re: Unity problem (Vignesh)<br> 29. Re: Unity problem (Rasim Duric)<br> 30. Billing server setup (Michael Back)<br> 31. Re: Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7 (Scott Voll)<br> 32. Re: Billing server setup (Samuel Womack)<br>
33. Re: Billing server setup (Michael Back)<br> 34. Re: Billing server setup (Ed Leatherman)<br> 35. [cisco-voip]<br> <0B9DBADCC054F343A927FD1BC72C60AB06FA53FE58@exchangemb-srv.baicv.local><br> (Inder Singh)<br>
36. DID (Inder Singh)<br> 37. VG224 and Call boxes (Inder Singh)<br> 38. NTP Reference for IP Phones (Inder Singh)<br> 39. CME group phone broadcast (Inder Singh)<br> 40. Re: Switch replacement causes one-way audio? (Aman Chugh)<br>
41. Re: Billing server setup (Wes Sisk)<br> 42. When is End of Life for Call Manager 4.1? (Miller, Steve)<br> 43. Call Forward on failure (Aman Chugh)<br> 44. Latest Firmware for Call Manager 4.1 Phones? (Miller, Steve)<br>
45. Re: When is End of Life for Call Manager 4.1? (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br> 46. Re: Call Forward on failure (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br> 47. Re: Call Forward on failure (Wes Sisk)<br> 48. Re: CUCM 6.1.3 media (FrogOnDSCP46EF)<br> 49. Re: Billing server setup (Samuel Womack)<br>
50. Re: Call Forward on failure (Aman Chugh)<br> 51. Fax and Modem Parameters ? (Dane)<br> 52. Re: Billing server setup (Michael Back)<br> 53. Re: Billing server setup (Ruben Montes (Europe))<br> 54. Re: Fwd: NTP Reference for IP Phones (Marcelo Zilio)<br>
55. Re: Fax and Modem Parameters ? (Ed Leatherman)<br> 56. Re: When is End of Life for Call Manager 4.1? (Turpin, Mark)<br> 57. Re: When is End of Life for Call Manager 4.1? (Craig Staffin)<br> 58. Re: When is End of Life for Call Manager 4.1? (Ryan Ratliff)<br>
59. Re: Fwd: NTP Reference for IP Phones (Ryan Ratliff)<br> 60. Re: When is End of Life for Call Manager 4.1? (Patrick Aland)<br> 61. Re: Fax and Modem Parameters ? (Scott Voll)<br> 62. Re: When is End of Life for Call Manager 4.1? (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br>
63. Re: When is End of Life for Call Manager 4.1? (Lelio Fulgenzi)<br> 64. Barge-in button disbled in CAD supervisor (shary shary)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>
Message: 1<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:59:51 +0100<br>From: <a href="mailto:rj.e@gmx.de">rj.e@gmx.de</a><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX historical report: DB access<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20090217165951.270900@gmx.net">20090217165951.270900@gmx.net</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br><br>After changing SQL Server to allow both SQL Authentication and Win NT Authentication, I cannot login anymore to UCCX Historical Reports application.<br>
<br>Log file (*_CiscoAppReports0.log) says:<br>1: 17.02.2009 17:38:12 %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:Database connection to 'CRA_DATABASE' failed due to ([Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Login failed for user 'db_cra'.)<br>
2: 17.02.2009 17:38:12 %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:Datenbankverbindungsfehler | Die Anmeldung bei der Datenbank ist fehlgeschlagen. Bitten Sie den Administrator, die ID und das Kennwort des Datenbankbenutzers, die dynamisch vom Unified CCX-Server abgerufen werden, zu ?berpr?fen.<br>
3: 17.02.2009 17:38:13 %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:CRA_DATABASE Connection String: Provider=MSDASQL;APP=Cisco CRA Historical Reports3892;Persist Security Info=False;Trusted_Connection=No;DRIVER=SQL Server;UID=db_cra;PWD=*****;SERVER=10.178.209.197\CRSSQL,4433;DATABASE=db_cra;NETWORK=dbmssocn;<br>
4: 17.02.2009 17:38:13 %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:Failed to login user to the apps server since we failed to initialize database connections<br><br><br>I created also a new System-DSN (db_cra1) in ODBC Admin (test was OK) and added that to hrcConfig.ini:<br>
<br>[CRA_DATABASE]<br>DRIVER=SQL Server<br>SERVER=10.178.209.196\CRSSQL<br>DATABASE=db_cra1<br>AUTH=2<br>NETWORK=dbmssocn<br>PORT=4433<br>UID=db_cra1<br><br>But does not help, still same message (concerning db_cra and 10.178.209.197\CRSSQL instead of db_cra1 and 10.178.209.196\CRSSQL !?)<br>
<br>I'm a bit confused what settings are taken for DB access? Any ideas?<br><br>Reinhold<br><br><br>--<br>Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger geh?rt? Der kann`s mit allen: <a href="http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01" target="_blank">http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01</a><br>
<br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:03:22 -0500<br>From: "Christopher M. Bomba" <<a href="mailto:cbomba@s4nets.com">cbomba@s4nets.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Getting Park functionality from analog devices<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID: <004a01c99121$a4253560$ec6fa020$@com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Anyone know of a way to get some Park like functionality from analog phones<br>
connected to a VG224 running SCCP. The documentation says that Park is a<br>supported feature but we followed up with Cisco and it is in fact not<br>supported. The site had this functionality before we migrated to Cisco and<br>
they are getting upset.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Chris<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 3<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:05:04 -0800<br>From: Scott Voll <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br>To: Tim Ritter <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:f84a38d30902170905neeb9801ndbfb2b1e7e9adb90@mail.gmail.com">f84a38d30902170905neeb9801ndbfb2b1e7e9adb90@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>
I don't know if I can give you much.<br><br>M$ does do a good job of Presence, and IM. I think that Unified messaging<br>still has a little to be desired, but in 3 to 5 years I think they could<br>nail that down. I do have a school using Exchange 2k7 for there UM system.<br>
works well for them. We use OCS for Presence and IM and am working on<br>integrating it with CM when I have time.<br><br>I don't think I like the idea of runing my call processing on M$ now that<br>I'm on the appliance based CM. But that doesn't mean that there won't be a<br>
mix and match of systems in the future if both M$ and Ci$co don't do things<br>to make one system or the other, truely the best.<br><br>MS doesn't currently have any contact center stuff to my knowledge so that<br>
will have to come if they really want to contend in the PBX market.<br><br>just my 2 cents<br><br>Scott<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Tim Ritter <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>> I have been looking all over for a forum to ask other Cisco PBX people<br>> about Microsoft and their PBX plans... this is the only one I can find that<br>> seems right. I hope you will give me your opinions and not kill me for not<br>
> asking a technical question...<br>><br>><br>><br>> <a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a><br>
><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> After reading this article it is obvious to me Microsoft intends to replace<br>> the PBX. The timeline looks like 3 to 5 years before they are in a position<br>> to fully replace the PBX and go head to head with the leaders of the PBX<br>
> industry.<br>><br>><br>><br>> My company is a MS house and this type system will gain a lot of interest<br>> especially since it is "free", not free as in free beer but free as in you<br>> already pay for it in your Microsoft CAL enterprise licenses so why not use<br>
> it and decommission the Costly PBX...<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> Your thoughts and sugestions about how to combat this...<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> Tim<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/4598f543/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/4598f543/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 4<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:18:16 -0500 (EST)<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Getting Park functionality from analog<br>
devices<br>To: "Christopher M. Bomba" <<a href="mailto:cbomba@s4nets.com">cbomba@s4nets.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:1094636774.5316731234891096632.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca">1094636774.5316731234891096632.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Another one of those "supported in CME but not CUCM" features. It's a shame really.<br><br><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/voice/fxs/configuration/guide/fxssccpsplmft.html" target="_blank">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/voice/fxs/configuration/guide/fxssccpsplmft.html</a><br>
<br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Christopher M. Bomba" <<a href="mailto:cbomba@s4nets.com">cbomba@s4nets.com</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:03:22 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Getting Park functionality from analog devices<br><br>Anyone know of a way to get some Park like functionality from analog phones<br>
connected to a VG224 running SCCP. The documentation says that Park is a<br>supported feature but we followed up with Cisco and it is in fact not<br>supported. The site had this functionality before we migrated to Cisco and<br>
they are getting upset.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Chris<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/ef3dad89/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/ef3dad89/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 5<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:20:06 -0500 (EST)<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br>
To: Scott Voll <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:1504596982.5317831234891206621.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca">1504596982.5317831234891206621.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Good points. I agree. I think MS will have to concentrate on hardening their systems before people will jump to running their PBX on it. Then again, if they can tolerate the system going down once and a while, maybe they won't care.<br>
<br>The other thing is, as far as I know, MS is not going to be producing hard phones. Something to consider.<br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Tim Ritter" <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:05:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br>I don't know if I can give you much.<br><br>M$ does do a good job of Presence, and IM. I think that Unified messaging still has a little to be desired, but in 3 to 5 years I think they could nail that down. I do have a school using Exchange 2k7 for there UM system. works well for them. We use OCS for Presence and IM and am working on integrating it with CM when I have time.<br>
<br>I don't think I like the idea of runing my call processing on M$ now that I'm on the appliance based CM. But that doesn't mean that there won't be a mix and match of systems in the future if both M$ and Ci$co don't do things to make one system or the other, truely the best.<br>
<br>MS doesn't currently have any contact center stuff to my knowledge so that will have to come if they really want to contend in the PBX market.<br><br>just my 2 cents<br><br>Scott<br><br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Tim Ritter < <a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a> > wrote:<br>
<br><br><br><br>I have been looking all over for a forum to ask other Cisco PBX people about Microsoft and their PBX plans... this is the only one I can find that seems right. I hope you will give me your opinions and not kill me for not asking a technical question...<br>
<br><br><br><a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a><br><br><br><br><br><br>After reading this article it is obvious to me Microsoft intends to replace the PBX. The timeline looks like 3 to 5 years before they are in a position to fully replace the PBX and go head to head with the leaders of the PBX industry.<br>
<br><br><br>My company is a MS house and this type system will gain a lot of interest especially since it is "free", not free as in free beer but free as in you already pay for it in your Microsoft CAL enterprise licenses so why not use it and decommission the Costly PBX...<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>Your thoughts and sugestions about how to combat this...<br><br><br><br><br><br>Tim<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/1a48f38e/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/1a48f38e/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 6<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:20:37 -0500<br>From: Ryan Ratliff <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Getting Park functionality from analog<br>
devices<br>To: "Christopher M. Bomba" <<a href="mailto:cbomba@s4nets.com">cbomba@s4nets.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:D681EF5E-8D7E-43F1-AA46-33DFC7153A57@cisco.com">D681EF5E-8D7E-43F1-AA46-33DFC7153A57@cisco.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed<br><br>I really thought it was supported but the docs I've found so far just<br>mention that directed call park on the vg224 is not supported with<br>
CUCM (only CME).<br><br>-Ryan<br><br>On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Christopher M. Bomba wrote:<br><br>Anyone know of a way to get some Park like functionality from analog<br>phones<br>connected to a VG224 running SCCP. The documentation says that Park<br>
is a<br>supported feature but we followed up with Cisco and it is in fact not<br>supported. The site had this functionality before we migrated to<br>Cisco and<br>they are getting upset.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Chris<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 7<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:23:16 -0500<br>From: "Christopher M. Bomba" <<a href="mailto:cbomba@s4nets.com">cbomba@s4nets.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Getting Park functionality from analog<br>
devices<br>To: "'Ryan Ratliff'" <<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <005001c99124$6c1ab6b0$44502410$@com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Yeah, we thought maybe it was supported in the latest release but after<br>talking to TAC they said nope. So now the users hear the night bell ring in<br>
the plant and can go over to the analog phones and use a pickup code to pick<br>the call up but if they need to park it they can't.<br><br>Chris<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:<a href="mailto:rratliff@cisco.com">rratliff@cisco.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:21 PM<br>To: Christopher M. Bomba<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Getting Park functionality from analog devices<br>
<br>I really thought it was supported but the docs I've found so far just<br>mention that directed call park on the vg224 is not supported with<br>CUCM (only CME).<br><br>-Ryan<br><br>On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Christopher M. Bomba wrote:<br>
<br>Anyone know of a way to get some Park like functionality from analog<br>phones<br>connected to a VG224 running SCCP. The documentation says that Park<br>is a<br>supported feature but we followed up with Cisco and it is in fact not<br>
supported. The site had this functionality before we migrated to<br>Cisco and<br>they are getting upset.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Chris<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 8<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:22:59 -0500<br>
From: "James Buchanan" <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br>To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "Scott Voll"<br>
<<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:84FD0A05752C5C408C811C5D07205B25079A739A@EXCHANGE.ctiusa.com">84FD0A05752C5C408C811C5D07205B25079A739A@EXCHANGE.ctiusa.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>They have partnered with Polycom for hard phones, and may I say, they?re fairly sweet.<br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:20 AM<br>To: Scott Voll<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br><br>Good points. I agree. I think MS will have to concentrate on hardening their systems before people will jump to running their PBX on it. Then again, if they can tolerate the system going down once and a while, maybe they won't care.<br>
<br>The other thing is, as far as I know, MS is not going to be producing hard phones. Something to consider.<br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Tim Ritter" <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:05:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br>I don't know if I can give you much.<br><br><br><br>M$ does do a good job of Presence, and IM. I think that Unified messaging still has a little to be desired, but in 3 to 5 years I think they could nail that down. I do have a school using Exchange 2k7 for there UM system. works well for them. We use OCS for Presence and IM and am working on integrating it with CM when I have time.<br>
<br><br><br>I don't think I like the idea of runing my call processing on M$ now that I'm on the appliance based CM. But that doesn't mean that there won't be a mix and match of systems in the future if both M$ and Ci$co don't do things to make one system or the other, truely the best.<br>
<br><br><br>MS doesn't currently have any contact center stuff to my knowledge so that will have to come if they really want to contend in the PBX market.<br><br><br><br>just my 2 cents<br><br><br><br>Scott<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Tim Ritter <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>I have been looking all over for a forum to ask other Cisco PBX people about Microsoft and their PBX plans... this is the only one I can find that seems right. I hope you will give me your opinions and not kill me for not asking a technical question...<br>
<br><br><br><a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a> <<a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a>><br>
<br><br><br><br><br>After reading this article it is obvious to me Microsoft intends to replace the PBX. The timeline looks like 3 to 5 years before they are in a position to fully replace the PBX and go head to head with the leaders of the PBX industry.<br>
<br><br><br>My company is a MS house and this type system will gain a lot of interest especially since it is "free", not free as in free beer but free as in you already pay for it in your Microsoft CAL enterprise licenses so why not use it and decommission the Costly PBX...<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>Your thoughts and sugestions about how to combat this...<br><br><br><br><br><br>Tim<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>No virus found in this incoming message.<br>Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com/" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.10.23/1953 - Release Date: 02/17/09 07:07:00<br><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/53179a31/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/53179a31/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 9<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:30:31 -0800<br>From: Scott Voll <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrade from CUCM 4.2.3 to 6.1.3<br>
To: Mayte Cantillo <<a href="mailto:mayte@fiu.edu">mayte@fiu.edu</a>><br>Cc: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:f84a38d30902170930j6c1faa4cm12cbcc1c163d7a16@mail.gmail.com">f84a38d30902170930j6c1faa4cm12cbcc1c163d7a16@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"<br>
<br>are you AD integrated?<br><br>did you setup the LDAP stuff when you got the box working? if not, then<br>your user accoount is probably deleted.<br><br>are all the services up and runing?<br><br>Scott<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Mayte Cantillo <<a href="mailto:mayte@fiu.edu">mayte@fiu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>> We just finished setting up a box on CUCM 6.1.3, and we used a DMA file<br>> to import the database from CUCM 4.2.3 The only change we did when<br>> importing the DMA file was to change the original hostname. We are not<br>
> using DNS in our environment.<br>><br>> On Friday, I was able to log in to the CM admin page fine. Yesterday I<br>> went to upload the license file, and I could not log in anymore. When I try<br>> to log in to the CM admin page, I keep getting a "Database connection<br>
> error". I have this box set up currently in a test environment.<br>><br>> Any light anyone might be able to shed will be appreciated? Not looking<br>> forward to re-do this box but, needs to be finished Wednesday. L<br>
><br>> Thanks!<br>><br>> - Mayte.<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/0a90d62d/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/0a90d62d/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 10<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:50:41 -0500<br>From: "Matt Slaga (US)" <<a href="mailto:Matt.Slaga@us.didata.com">Matt.Slaga@us.didata.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "Scott Voll"<br> <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Message-ID:<br> <C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00DB21D97@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Right now, I think the best platform is a combination of both. You can get the deep application integration of the Microsoft client and the solid, robust and best-of-class ip voice services that Cisco offers. The combination is truly powerful, especially with Cisco?s upcoming integration pieces.<br>
<br><br><br>Microsoft is making hard phones, both USB and network phone endpoint devices. They are OEM through Polycom. Search google for Polycom CX700 and CX200. They also make the RoundTable device, which I have to admit is quite impressive.<br>
<br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:20 PM<br>To: Scott Voll<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br><br>Good points. I agree. I think MS will have to concentrate on hardening their systems before people will jump to running their PBX on it. Then again, if they can tolerate the system going down once and a while, maybe they won't care.<br>
<br>The other thing is, as far as I know, MS is not going to be producing hard phones. Something to consider.<br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Tim Ritter" <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:05:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br>I don't know if I can give you much.<br><br><br><br>M$ does do a good job of Presence, and IM. I think that Unified messaging still has a little to be desired, but in 3 to 5 years I think they could nail that down. I do have a school using Exchange 2k7 for there UM system. works well for them. We use OCS for Presence and IM and am working on integrating it with CM when I have time.<br>
<br><br><br>I don't think I like the idea of runing my call processing on M$ now that I'm on the appliance based CM. But that doesn't mean that there won't be a mix and match of systems in the future if both M$ and Ci$co don't do things to make one system or the other, truely the best.<br>
<br><br><br>MS doesn't currently have any contact center stuff to my knowledge so that will have to come if they really want to contend in the PBX market.<br><br><br><br>just my 2 cents<br><br><br><br>Scott<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Tim Ritter <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>I have been looking all over for a forum to ask other Cisco PBX people about Microsoft and their PBX plans... this is the only one I can find that seems right. I hope you will give me your opinions and not kill me for not asking a technical question...<br>
<br><br><br><a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a> <<a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a>><br>
<br><br><br><br><br>After reading this article it is obvious to me Microsoft intends to replace the PBX. The timeline looks like 3 to 5 years before they are in a position to fully replace the PBX and go head to head with the leaders of the PBX industry.<br>
<br><br><br>My company is a MS house and this type system will gain a lot of interest especially since it is "free", not free as in free beer but free as in you already pay for it in your Microsoft CAL enterprise licenses so why not use it and decommission the Costly PBX...<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>Your thoughts and sugestions about how to combat this...<br><br><br><br><br><br>Tim<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br>-----------------------------------------<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>from your computer. Thank you.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/ccce3dca/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/ccce3dca/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 11<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:54:48 -0500<br>From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "Scott Voll"<br> <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Message-ID:<br> <C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00DB21DC2@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>The irony here I?ve ran CallManger under Windows for years. Never had it go down except for having to apply Cisco upgrades every couple weeks (remember CallManager 3x, 4x you had a bug fix every 4 weeks). When CallManager did go down another server took over and it was mostly transparent to end users. I went thru Welchia/Nachia and all the other worms and never had an outage, I monitored security bulletins from Symantec and ISS and applied security updates from vendors regardless of platforms (Unix, Linux, Windows, OS X).<br>
<br><br><br>You can get hardware that is everything hot swappable like the IBM x440/SAN and run non-stop Windows, Linux, Unix or VMWare ESX, etc.<br><br><br><br>I?m used to see more application issues (memory leaks, reboots in 248 days) then Windows or Linux core OS itself going down once and a while!<br>
<br><br><br>Going back to the original question, will CTOs choose to pay more to have Cisco over Microsoft or will they force a move to OCS as it would reduce their IT budget ? I can see it happening in smaller shop first that couldn?t afford SmartNet or CallManager to start with. This is like when Nortel was Legacy and Cisco could save you money with this open-platform Selsius Communications Box?<br>
<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:20 PM<br>To: Scott Voll<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br><br>Good points. I agree. I think MS will have to concentrate on hardening their systems before people will jump to running their PBX on it. Then again, if they can tolerate the system going down once and a while, maybe they won't care.<br>
<br>The other thing is, as far as I know, MS is not going to be producing hard phones. Something to consider.<br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Tim Ritter" <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:05:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br>I don't know if I can give you much.<br><br><br><br>M$ does do a good job of Presence, and IM. I think that Unified messaging still has a little to be desired, but in 3 to 5 years I think they could nail that down. I do have a school using Exchange 2k7 for there UM system. works well for them. We use OCS for Presence and IM and am working on integrating it with CM when I have time.<br>
<br><br><br>I don't think I like the idea of runing my call processing on M$ now that I'm on the appliance based CM. But that doesn't mean that there won't be a mix and match of systems in the future if both M$ and Ci$co don't do things to make one system or the other, truely the best.<br>
<br><br><br>MS doesn't currently have any contact center stuff to my knowledge so that will have to come if they really want to contend in the PBX market.<br><br><br><br>just my 2 cents<br><br><br><br>Scott<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Tim Ritter <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>I have been looking all over for a forum to ask other Cisco PBX people about Microsoft and their PBX plans... this is the only one I can find that seems right. I hope you will give me your opinions and not kill me for not asking a technical question...<br>
<br><br><br><a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a> <<a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a>><br>
<br><br><br><br><br>After reading this article it is obvious to me Microsoft intends to replace the PBX. The timeline looks like 3 to 5 years before they are in a position to fully replace the PBX and go head to head with the leaders of the PBX industry.<br>
<br><br><br>My company is a MS house and this type system will gain a lot of interest especially since it is "free", not free as in free beer but free as in you already pay for it in your Microsoft CAL enterprise licenses so why not use it and decommission the Costly PBX...<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>Your thoughts and sugestions about how to combat this...<br><br><br><br><br><br>Tim<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br>-----------------------------------------<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>from your computer. Thank you.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/0bb866f4/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/0bb866f4/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 12<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:58:08 -0600<br>From: "Victor Rodriguez" <<a href="mailto:victor.rodriguez@neoris.com">victor.rodriguez@neoris.com</a>><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity problem<br>To: <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:0B435E3251BF7741A5A2B860D2D2412E1AC88AE2@MXMTYMXS02.neoris.cxnetworks.net">0B435E3251BF7741A5A2B860D2D2412E1AC88AE2@MXMTYMXS02.neoris.cxnetworks.net</a>><br>
<br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Hi.<br><br><br><br>I think this problem for you is very easy, but for me its becoming a<br>real headache I have a Unity (Cisco Unity 4.0 Build 4.0(2)), the problem<br>
is regarding the priv1.edb file in the Microsoft exchange, the size is<br>growing and growing 25G or more and the Unity stop working, some person<br>tell me if I do a NTBackup for the mailbox it will fix that problem, but<br>
nothing happened the file keep growing, if you know how to solve this,<br>please help me<br><br><br><br>Victor Rodriguez<br><br><br><br><br>#################################################################################################################<br>
Este documento puede incluir información confidencial y propiedad de Neoris y deberá ser leído solamente por la<br>o las personas a quienes está dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor avise<br>inmediatamente al remitente contestando y eliminando este correo. Cualquier punto de vista u opiniones expresadas<br>
en este mensaje son del remitente y no necesariamente coinciden con aquellas de Neoris. Este documento no deberá<br>ser reproducido, copiado, distribuido, publicado, ni modificado por terceros sin la autorización por escrito de Neoris.<br>
<br>Este mensaje ha sido verificado contra virus. Visítenos en <a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a>.<br><br><br><br>This document may include proprietary and confidential information of Neoris, and may only be read by those<br>
person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please advise<br>the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail<br>
are those of the sender and do not necessarily coincide with those of Neoris. This document may not be reproduced,<br>copied, distributed, published, modified or furnished to third parties, without the prior written consent of<br>
Neoris.<br><br>This e-mail message has been scanned for viruses and cleared. Visit us at <a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a><br>##################################################################################################################<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/cd2625c8/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/cd2625c8/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 13<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:10:58 -0500<br>From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity problem<br>
To: "Victor Rodriguez" <<a href="mailto:victor.rodriguez@neoris.com">victor.rodriguez@neoris.com</a>>,<br> <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br>
<C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00DB21E18@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>I assume you are running Unity Voicemail Only? Or is this Unified and messages appearing in Outlook? Cisco shipped the Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition which shouldn't have an issue with mailstore size. I would suggest patching to 4.0(5) and see if the Unity problem stops.<br>
<br><br><br>I would check you Windows Event Viewer logs in both Exchange and Unity to see what is happening. What is the exact error message when it stops?<br><br><br><br>I would use Unity Reports in Web/Sa to view mailbox sizes and consider changing to G729 codec and adding hardware DSP resources. Lastly you can set mailbox size limits to reduce large mailbox offenders and also run ESEUTIL after hours.<br>
<br><br><br><a href="http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Unified%20Communications%20and%20Video&topic=Unified%20Communications%20Applications&topicID=.ee835d2&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40%40.ee9cef2/0#selected_message" target="_blank">http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Unified%20Communications%20and%20Video&topic=Unified%20Communications%20Applications&topicID=.ee835d2&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40%40.ee9cef2/0#selected_message</a><br>
<br><br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Victor Rodriguez<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:58 PM<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity problem<br><br><br><br>Hi.<br><br><br><br>I think this problem for you is very easy, but for me its becoming a real headache I have a Unity (Cisco Unity 4.0 Build 4.0(2)), the problem is regarding the priv1.edb file in the Microsoft exchange, the size is growing and growing 25G or more and the Unity stop working, some person tell me if I do a NTBackup for the mailbox it will fix that problem, but nothing happened the file keep growing, if you know how to solve this, please help me<br>
<br><br><br>Victor Rodriguez<br><br><br><br>________________________________<br><br>Este documento puede incluir informaci?n confidencial y propiedad de Neoris y deber? ser le?do solamente por la o las personas a quienes est? dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor avise inmediatamente al remitente contestando y eliminando este correo. Cualquier punto de vista u opiniones expresadas en este mensaje son del remitente y no necesariamente coinciden con aquellas de Neoris. Este documento no deber? ser reproducido, copiado, distribuido, publicado, ni modificado por terceros sin la autorizaci?n por escrito de Neoris.<br>
<br>Este mensaje ha sido verificado contra virus. Vis?tenos en <a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a> <outbind://91/<a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a>> .<br>
<br>This document may include proprietary and confidential information of Neoris, and may only be read by those person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and do not necessarily coincide with those of Neoris. This document may not be reproduced, copied, distributed, published, modified or furnished to third parties, without the prior written consent of Neoris.<br>
<br>This e-mail message has been scanned for viruses and cleared. Visit us at <a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a>.<br><br>________________________________<br><br><br><br><br>-----------------------------------------<br>
Disclaimer:<br><br>This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>
from your computer. Thank you.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/1e747d76/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/1e747d76/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 14<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:14:18 -0500<br>From: "Biffle, Gerrad" <<a href="mailto:Gerrad.Biffle@greensboro-nc.gov">Gerrad.Biffle@greensboro-nc.gov</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 and Call boxes<br>To: "Fuermann, Jason" <<a href="mailto:JBF005@shsu.edu">JBF005@shsu.edu</a>>, "c3voip" <<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a>>,<br>
"Peter Slow" <<a href="mailto:peter.slow@gmail.com">peter.slow@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:038ECED6C286904CA93C8A76ABC45DF516C05984@VENUS.greensboronc.org">038ECED6C286904CA93C8A76ABC45DF516C05984@VENUS.greensboronc.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>It might be a voltage issue. We were seeing low voltage issues on some<br>lines we supply to Positron 911 equipment until we put the following<br>command on each of the lines: alt-battery-feed feed2. If memory serves<br>
me correctly - this increases the idle line voltage. Not sure if it<br>would help you or not - but thought I'd throw it out there as something<br>you might want to take a look at.<br><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Fuermann, Jason<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:23 AM<br>To: 'c3voip'; 'Peter Slow'<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 and Call boxes<br>
<br>I wish it were that simple. We've tried these in our telco room with a<br>PSTN line and they work fine, but as soon as we switch back to the VG we<br>get the disconnect problem again<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of c3voip<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 8:49 AM<br>To: Fuermann, Jason; 'Peter Slow'<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 and Call boxes<br>
<br>We've had similar problems and it ended up being the contacts on the<br>button<br>of the call boxes. Some contact cleaner and contact grease fixed the<br>problem. The problem tends to arise when seasons change or humidity<br>
levels<br>change.<br><br>-C<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Fuermann, Jason<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:39 AM<br>To: 'Peter Slow'<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 and Call boxes<br><br>Call boxes, essentially speakerphones that autodial a number when you<br>
push a<br>button. Also, yes if we use a butt set or connect a regular phone to the<br>line, it works fine.<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Peter Slow [mailto:<a href="mailto:peter.slow@gmail.com">peter.slow@gmail.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 11:44 PM<br>To: Fuermann, Jason<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 and Call boxes<br><br>Jason,<br> What are these "boxes?" If you replace them with a cheap analog<br>
phone, can you reproduce the problem with that?<br><br>-Peter<br><br>On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Fuermann, Jason <<a href="mailto:JBF005@shsu.edu">JBF005@shsu.edu</a>><br>wrote:<br>> We have a bunch of call boxes that have suddenly started to hang up<br>
when<br>the call is answered at our PD. These had been previously working fine,<br>and<br>the vendor even says that the VG224 is compatible with them. The only<br>change<br>I know about that occurred was we rebooted all the nodes in our cluster<br>
and<br>the vg224 gateways as well. The CDR's show a disconnect code of<br>"unknown" so<br>I'm thinking that maybe this is a supervisory disconnect from the<br>gateway.<br>Does anybody have any ideas on what may be going on?<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
=======================================================<br>Please note that email sent to and from this address is subject<br>to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to<br>third parties.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/21fa3869/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/21fa3869/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 15<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:16:46 +0200<br>From: "John Botha - I.T" <<a href="mailto:JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za">JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4 agent<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <6C9F4F6E5EDF234A9B521E6E2E21C126016058A6@midrand05.mustek.local><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>Hi All<br><br><br><br><br><br>I have an ipcc call center the call does not get presented to the agent<br>but it does get answer from the script the music starts to play but the<br>agent does receive the call he is ready<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>Regards,<br><br>John<br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/121b0322/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/121b0322/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 16<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:18:17 -0800<br>From: Tanner Ezell <<a href="mailto:tanner.ezell@gmail.com">tanner.ezell@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4 agent<br>
To: "John Botha - I.T" <<a href="mailto:JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za">JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:9c4f122d0902171018t59f52be2m1e8361182bbf4f81@mail.gmail.com">9c4f122d0902171018t59f52be2m1e8361182bbf4f81@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>You really need to provide us more information on whats going on, but in<br>general:<br>Check the script**, check the CSQ's, check the Resource Group, check the<br>
Resources, etc<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, John Botha - I.T<br><<a href="mailto:JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za">JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za</a>>wrote:<br><br>> Hi All<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> I have an ipcc call center the call does not get presented to the agent but<br>
> it does get answer from the script the music starts to play but the agent<br>> does receive the call he is ready<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> Regards,<br>><br>> John<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/09b03f2a/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/09b03f2a/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 17<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:19:04 -0500 (EST)<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br>
To: James Buchanan <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:1598346566.5355501234894744261.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca">1598346566.5355501234894744261.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>I was aware of some partnerships, but what I meant to say was there is not going to be any Microsoft badged phone.<br><br>Has that changed?<br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br>
<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "James Buchanan" <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>><br>To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:22:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br><br><br>They have partnered with Polycom for hard phones, and may I say, they?re fairly sweet.<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:20 AM<br>To: Scott Voll<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br><br><br>Good points. I agree. I think MS will have to concentrate on hardening their systems before people will jump to running their PBX on it. Then again, if they can tolerate the system going down once and a while, maybe they won't care.<br>
<br>The other thing is, as far as I know, MS is not going to be producing hard phones. Something to consider.<br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Tim Ritter" <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:05:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br>I don't know if I can give you much.<br><br><br><br><br><br>M$ does do a good job of Presence, and IM. I think that Unified messaging still has a little to be desired, but in 3 to 5 years I think they could nail that down. I do have a school using Exchange 2k7 for there UM system. works well for them. We use OCS for Presence and IM and am working on integrating it with CM when I have time.<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>I don't think I like the idea of runing my call processing on M$ now that I'm on the appliance based CM. But that doesn't mean that there won't be a mix and match of systems in the future if both M$ and Ci$co don't do things to make one system or the other, truely the best.<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>MS doesn't currently have any contact center stuff to my knowledge so that will have to come if they really want to contend in the PBX market.<br><br><br><br><br><br>just my 2 cents<br><br><br><br>
<br><br>Scott<br><br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Tim Ritter < <a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a> > wrote:<br><br>I have been looking all over for a forum to ask other Cisco PBX people about Microsoft and their PBX plans... this is the only one I can find that seems right. I hope you will give me your opinions and not kill me for not asking a technical question...<br>
<br><br><br><a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a><br><br><br><br><br><br>After reading this article it is obvious to me Microsoft intends to replace the PBX. The timeline looks like 3 to 5 years before they are in a position to fully replace the PBX and go head to head with the leaders of the PBX industry.<br>
<br><br><br>My company is a MS house and this type system will gain a lot of interest especially since it is "free", not free as in free beer but free as in you already pay for it in your Microsoft CAL enterprise licenses so why not use it and decommission the Costly PBX...<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>Your thoughts and sugestions about how to combat this...<br><br><br><br><br><br>Tim<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>No virus found in this incoming message.<br>Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com/" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.10.23/1953 - Release Date: 02/17/09 07:07:00<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/6480fbdf/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/6480fbdf/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 18<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:21:59 -0600<br>From: "Carter, Bill" <<a href="mailto:bcarter@sentinel.com">bcarter@sentinel.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Recover AIM-CUE<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:svr.file@gmail.com">svr.file@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:C0B4574561D1E04DBB500BA062BAF226B3194C@Mail1.sentinel.com">C0B4574561D1E04DBB500BA062BAF226B3194C@Mail1.sentinel.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Yes, the new CF Flash card was formatted in a Cisco Router before<br>installed in the AIM-CUE.<br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:markju@gmail.com">markju@gmail.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:markju@gmail.com">markju@gmail.com</a>] On Behalf Of<br>
<a href="mailto:svr.file@gmail.com">svr.file@gmail.com</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:05 AM<br>To: Carter, Bill<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Recover AIM-CUE<br>
<br><br><br>Hi,<br><br>Have you tried formating the flash card?<br><br>svr<br><br>2009/2/14 Carter, Bill <<a href="mailto:bcarter@sentinel.com">bcarter@sentinel.com</a>><br><br>I have an AIM-CUE. The flash card was faulty to I purchased a new CF<br>
Flash card. I am having trouble installing CUE on the AIM. I am getting<br>the following error:<br><br><br><br>Not a Cisco supported CF. Please use Cisco supported CF and reinstall<br>the software.<br><br>System Halted.<br>
<br><br><br>I also see<br><br><br><br>CF capacity not supported by this software release<br><br>CF size = 2000880, supported sizes 2001888 and 1000944 blocks. Install<br>correct release for this CF size<br><br><br><br>Suggestions ?<br>
<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/92fa3f3e/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/92fa3f3e/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 19<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:21:28 -0100<br>From: Ant?nio Fragoso <<a href="mailto:Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv">Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] List.xml 7979 7911 Background Image for<br>
CallManager<br>To: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <0B9DBADCC054F343A927FD1BC72C60AB06FA53FF3D@exchangemb-srv.baicv.local><br>
<br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Hi Team<br>I have a cisco 7970 and 7911 in my network<br>I change the backgroud image on the 7970 and now I want to change for the 7911<br>My question is concerning the list.xml file - I need put all information on the same List.xml for both or I will need another list.xml for 7911<br>
<br><br>Antonio Fragoso<br>[cid:image001.jpg@01C99123.AFA48F10]<br>BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.<br>Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunica?ao<br>Edif?cio Santa Maria, 1? Andar<br>Ch? de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459<br>Santiago, Cabo Verde<br>
Tel.: +238 260 1224/26<br>Fax: +238 262 2810<br><a href="mailto:antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv">antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv">nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv</a>><br><a href="http://www.bancobai.cv/" target="_blank">www.bancobai.cv</a><<a href="http://www.bancobai.ao/" target="_blank">http://www.bancobai.ao/</a>><br>
<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/50bdd548/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/50bdd548/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: image001.jpg<br>Type: image/jpeg<br>Size: 3305 bytes<br>Desc: image001.jpg<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/50bdd548/attachment-0001.jpg" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/50bdd548/attachment-0001.jpg</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 20<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:27:15 -0500 (EST)<br>From: Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br>
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:1728541187.5360201234895235526.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca">1728541187.5360201234895235526.JavaMail.root@superior.cs.uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>It's the same, but different. I think Cisco reacts a bit quicker to bugs and threats than MS does. It could be unsubstantiated, but I think it's true. So Cisco apps running ontop of Windows in my opinion are a bit more hardy than an MS App in my opinion. That's not always the case, but most of the time it is.<br>
<br>On top of that, if MS comes out with a solution that is 10x cheaper than Cisco's, one of three things is going to happen:<br><br> ? Cisco will come out with a powerpoint showing all the hidden costs of an MS deployment.<br>
? Cisco will lower their price<br> ? Cisco will loose market share quickly<br><br>Many enterprises are watching the MS solution as it matures and will drop a Cisco deployment on a moments notice for many of the things you mention below. Even if it does mean losing a few features or only getting 4 nines instead of 5.<br>
<br>Cisco will not be able to turn a blind eye on this. MS is likely going to be in this for the long run and will probably even lose money in the short term to get the market share.<br><br>Remember O/S2 vs Windows? ;)<br>
<br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <<a href="mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com">jason.aarons@us.didata.com</a>><br>To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:54:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br><br><br>The irony here I?ve ran CallManger under Windows for years. Never had it go down except for having to apply Cisco upgrades every couple weeks (remember CallManager 3x, 4x you had a bug fix every 4 weeks). When CallManager did go down another server took over and it was mostly transparent to end users. I went thru Welchia/Nachia and all the other worms and never had an outage, I monitored security bulletins from Symantec and ISS and applied security updates from vendors regardless of platforms (Unix, Linux, Windows, OS X).<br>
<br><br><br>You can get hardware that is everything hot swappable like the IBM x440/SAN and run non-stop Windows, Linux, Unix or VMWare ESX, etc.<br><br><br><br>I?m used to see more application issues (memory leaks, reboots in 248 days) then Windows or Linux core OS itself going down once and a while!<br>
<br><br><br>Going back to the original question, will CTOs choose to pay more to have Cisco over Microsoft or will they force a move to OCS as it would reduce their IT budget ? I can see it happening in smaller shop first that couldn?t afford SmartNet or CallManager to start with. This is like when Nortel was Legacy and Cisco could save you money with this open-platform Selsius Communications Box?<br>
<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:20 PM<br>To: Scott Voll<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br><br><br>Good points. I agree. I think MS will have to concentrate on hardening their systems before people will jump to running their PBX on it. Then again, if they can tolerate the system going down once and a while, maybe they won't care.<br>
<br>The other thing is, as far as I know, MS is not going to be producing hard phones. Something to consider.<br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Tim Ritter" <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:05:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br>I don't know if I can give you much.<br><br><br><br><br><br>M$ does do a good job of Presence, and IM. I think that Unified messaging still has a little to be desired, but in 3 to 5 years I think they could nail that down. I do have a school using Exchange 2k7 for there UM system. works well for them. We use OCS for Presence and IM and am working on integrating it with CM when I have time.<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>I don't think I like the idea of runing my call processing on M$ now that I'm on the appliance based CM. But that doesn't mean that there won't be a mix and match of systems in the future if both M$ and Ci$co don't do things to make one system or the other, truely the best.<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>MS doesn't currently have any contact center stuff to my knowledge so that will have to come if they really want to contend in the PBX market.<br><br><br><br><br><br>just my 2 cents<br><br><br><br>
<br><br>Scott<br><br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Tim Ritter < <a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a> > wrote:<br><br>I have been looking all over for a forum to ask other Cisco PBX people about Microsoft and their PBX plans... this is the only one I can find that seems right. I hope you will give me your opinions and not kill me for not asking a technical question...<br>
<br><br><br><a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a><br><br><br><br><br><br>After reading this article it is obvious to me Microsoft intends to replace the PBX. The timeline looks like 3 to 5 years before they are in a position to fully replace the PBX and go head to head with the leaders of the PBX industry.<br>
<br><br><br>My company is a MS house and this type system will gain a lot of interest especially since it is "free", not free as in free beer but free as in you already pay for it in your Microsoft CAL enterprise licenses so why not use it and decommission the Costly PBX...<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>Your thoughts and sugestions about how to combat this...<br><br><br><br><br><br>Tim<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br><br><br><br>Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/10308680/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/10308680/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 21<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:30:48 -0500<br>From: "c3voip" <<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID: <00ca01c9912d$daab3920$9001ab60$@<a href="http://rr.com/" target="_blank">rr.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>We are getting a new CUCCX 7.0 box and would like to migrate some scripts<br>from our IPCC Ent 4 cluster to it.<br><br><br><br>Is there a way to convert IPCC Ent. 4 scripts to CUCCX?<br><br><br><br>Thanks,<br><br>-C<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/49e385d1/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/49e385d1/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 22<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:34:40 -0700<br>From: Johnny <<a href="mailto:randvines@gmail.com">randvines@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4 agent<br>
To: "'Tanner Ezell'" <<a href="mailto:tanner.ezell@gmail.com">tanner.ezell@gmail.com</a>>, "'John Botha - I.T'"<br> <<a href="mailto:JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za">JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <014401c9912e$66761e70$33625b50$@com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>If the agent isn't receiving the call its not being sent to the CSQ, that is<br>
assuming that the CSQ has been setup correctly.<br><br><br><br>The agent needs to be assigned to the CSQ and the "select resource" step<br>needs to point to the CSQ also. If you are using the default ICD.aef script<br>
you need to go to the applications screen and change the CSQ parameter to<br>the CSQ that you created.<br><br><br><br>Hope this helps, I'm only assuming what could be wrong. Need more<br>information about the setup if possible.<br>
<br><br><br>Kind Regards,<br><br><br><br>Johnny<br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Tanner Ezell<br>
Sent: 17 February 2009 11:18<br>To: John Botha - I.T<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4 agent<br><br><br><br>You really need to provide us more information on whats going on, but in<br>
general:<br>Check the script**, check the CSQ's, check the Resource Group, check the<br>Resources, etc<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, John Botha - I.T <<a href="mailto:JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za">JohnB@jhb.mustek.co.za</a>><br>
wrote:<br><br>Hi All<br><br><br><br><br><br>I have an ipcc call center the call does not get presented to the agent but<br>it does get answer from the script the music starts to play but the agent<br>does receive the call he is ready<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>Regards,<br><br>John<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/a0bc4c8e/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/a0bc4c8e/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 23<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:55:03 -0600<br>From: Jack Martin <<a href="mailto:jackm@tushaus.com">jackm@tushaus.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] List.xml 7979 7911 Background Image for<br>
CallManager<br>To: Ant?nio Fragoso <<a href="mailto:Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv">Antonio.Fragoso@bancobai.cv</a>>,<br> "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:86DD253A50828C40AB51057072CC6CD03901386338@SARGE.Tushaus.com">86DD253A50828C40AB51057072CC6CD03901386338@SARGE.Tushaus.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/7906g_7911g/5_0/sip/english/administration/guide/11ag50si.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/7906g_7911g/5_0/sip/english/administration/guide/11ag50si.pdf</a><br>
<br>Jack Martin, CCVP<br>Network Engineer<br>Tushaus Computer Services<br>10400 Innovation Drive, Ste 100<br>Milwaukee, WI 53226<br>414.908.2222 Helpdesk<br>414.908.2267 Work<br>414.908.4467 Fax<br>414.477.6990 Cell<br><br>
From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Ant?nio Fragoso<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:21 PM<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] List.xml 7979 7911 Background Image for CallManager<br><br><br>Hi Team<br>
I have a cisco 7970 and 7911 in my network<br>I change the backgroud image on the 7970 and now I want to change for the 7911<br>My question is concerning the list.xml file - I need put all information on the same List.xml for both or I will need another list.xml for 7911<br>
<br><br>Antonio Fragoso<br>[cid:image001.jpg@01C990FE.F2CA31C0]<br>BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.<br>Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunica?ao<br>Edif?cio Santa Maria, 1? Andar<br>Ch? de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459<br>Santiago, Cabo Verde<br>
Tel.: +238 260 1224/26<br>Fax: +238 262 2810<br><a href="mailto:antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv">antonio.fragoso@bancobai.cv</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv">nelson.ramos@bancobai.cv</a>><br><a href="http://www.bancobai.cv/" target="_blank">www.bancobai.cv</a><<a href="http://www.bancobai.ao/" target="_blank">http://www.bancobai.ao/</a>><br>
<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/59a55a96/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/59a55a96/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: image001.jpg<br>Type: image/jpeg<br>Size: 3305 bytes<br>Desc: image001.jpg<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/59a55a96/attachment-0001.jpg" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/59a55a96/attachment-0001.jpg</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 24<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:01:37 -0500<br>From: "Matt Slaga (US)" <<a href="mailto:Matt.Slaga@us.didata.com">Matt.Slaga@us.didata.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "James Buchanan"<br> <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Message-ID:<br> <C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00DB8DE04@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>The Roundtable has the Microsoft logo. Your are correct on the others, they read Polycom, Nortel or LG.<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 1:19 PM<br>To: James Buchanan<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br><br>I was aware of some partnerships, but what I meant to say was there is not going to be any Microsoft badged phone.<br>
<br>Has that changed?<br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "James Buchanan" <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>><br>To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>>, "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:22:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br>They have partnered with Polycom for hard phones, and may I say, they?re fairly sweet.<br>
<br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:20 AM<br>To: Scott Voll<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br><br><br>Good points. I agree. I think MS will have to concentrate on hardening their systems before people will jump to running their PBX on it. Then again, if they can tolerate the system going down once and a while, maybe they won't care.<br>
<br>The other thing is, as far as I know, MS is not going to be producing hard phones. Something to consider.<br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Scott Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Tim Ritter" <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:05:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] End of the PBX<br><br>I don't know if I can give you much.<br><br><br><br>M$ does do a good job of Presence, and IM. I think that Unified messaging still has a little to be desired, but in 3 to 5 years I think they could nail that down. I do have a school using Exchange 2k7 for there UM system. works well for them. We use OCS for Presence and IM and am working on integrating it with CM when I have time.<br>
<br><br><br>I don't think I like the idea of runing my call processing on M$ now that I'm on the appliance based CM. But that doesn't mean that there won't be a mix and match of systems in the future if both M$ and Ci$co don't do things to make one system or the other, truely the best.<br>
<br><br><br>MS doesn't currently have any contact center stuff to my knowledge so that will have to come if they really want to contend in the PBX market.<br><br><br><br>just my 2 cents<br><br><br><br>Scott<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Tim Ritter <<a href="mailto:timritter@gmail.com">timritter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>I have been looking all over for a forum to ask other Cisco PBX people about Microsoft and their PBX plans... this is the only one I can find that seems right. I hope you will give me your opinions and not kill me for not asking a technical question...<br>
<br><br><br><a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a> <<a href="http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul" target="_blank">http://www.techworld.com.au/article/275963/microsoft_rounds_voice_assaul</a>><br>
<br><br><br><br><br>After reading this article it is obvious to me Microsoft intends to replace the PBX. The timeline looks like 3 to 5 years before they are in a position to fully replace the PBX and go head to head with the leaders of the PBX industry.<br>
<br><br><br>My company is a MS house and this type system will gain a lot of interest especially since it is "free", not free as in free beer but free as in you already pay for it in your Microsoft CAL enterprise licenses so why not use it and decommission the Costly PBX...<br>
<br><br><br><br><br>Your thoughts and sugestions about how to combat this...<br><br><br><br><br><br>Tim<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>No virus found in this incoming message.<br>Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com/" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.10.23/1953 - Release Date: 02/17/09 07:07:00<br><br>
<br><br>-----------------------------------------<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain<br>confidential and privileged information and is for use by the<br>designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the<br>
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received<br>this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of<br>this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be<br>unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please<br>
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it<br>from your computer. Thank you.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/f22eb9b7/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/f22eb9b7/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 25<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:27:27 -0800<br>From: Scott Voll <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br>
To: c3voip <<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:f84a38d30902171227p225712cdoe51b8c4960c28d93@mail.gmail.com">f84a38d30902171227p225712cdoe51b8c4960c28d93@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>CCx 4 to 5 was just a matter of opening in the editor and resaving. I would<br>thing 7 would most likely be the same.<br><br>Scott<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM, c3voip <<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>> We are getting a new CUCCX 7.0 box and would like to migrate some scripts<br>> from our IPCC Ent 4 cluster to it.<br>><br>><br>><br>> Is there a way to convert IPCC Ent. 4 scripts to CUCCX?<br>><br>
><br>><br>> Thanks,<br>><br>> -C<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/d7cb43aa/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/d7cb43aa/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 26<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:28:37 -0500<br>From: Matthew Loraditch <<a href="mailto:MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com">MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br>To: Scott Voll <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>>, c3voip <<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a>><br>
Cc: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <530C67FE62559C42857C78B962454E6202233E8D23@hermes.helion.local><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>That is how I did a conversion<br><br><br>Matthew Loraditch<br>1965 Greenspring Drive<br>Timonium, MD 21093<br><a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a>><br>
(p) (410) 252-8830<br>(F) (443) 541-1593<br><br>Visit us at <a href="http://www.heliontechnologies.com/" target="_blank">www.heliontechnologies.com</a><<a href="http://www.heliontechnologies.com/" target="_blank">http://www.heliontechnologies.com</a>><br>
Support Issue? Email <a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a>> for fast assistance!<br>
<br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Scott Voll<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:27 PM<br>To: c3voip<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br><br>CCx 4 to 5 was just a matter of opening in the editor and resaving. I would thing 7 would most likely be the same.<br>
<br>Scott<br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM, c3voip <<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a>>> wrote:<br><br>We are getting a new CUCCX 7.0 box and would like to migrate some scripts from our IPCC Ent 4 cluster to it.<br>
<br><br><br>Is there a way to convert IPCC Ent. 4 scripts to CUCCX?<br><br><br><br>Thanks,<br><br>-C<br><br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/f6fa5f51/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/f6fa5f51/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 27<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:07:55 -0500<br>From: "James Buchanan" <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br>
To: "Matthew Loraditch" <<a href="mailto:MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com">MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com</a>>, "Scott<br> Voll" <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>>, "c3voip" <<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:84FD0A05752C5C408C811C5D07205B25079A75DF@EXCHANGE.ctiusa.com">84FD0A05752C5C408C811C5D07205B25079A75DF@EXCHANGE.ctiusa.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Me too. Worked great. I did not find anything in the scripts that didn't<br>work with UCCX 7.<br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Matthew<br>Loraditch<br>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:29 PM<br>To: Scott Voll; c3voip<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br><br><br><br>That is how I did a conversion<br><br><br><br><br><br>Matthew Loraditch<br>1965 Greenspring Drive<br><br>Timonium, MD 21093<br><a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a>><br>
(p) (410) 252-8830<br>(F) (443) 541-1593<br><br>Visit us at <a href="http://www.heliontechnologies.com/" target="_blank">www.heliontechnologies.com</a><br><<a href="http://www.heliontechnologies.com/" target="_blank">http://www.heliontechnologies.com</a>><br>
Support Issue? Email <a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a><br><mailto:<a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a>> for fast assistance!<br>
<br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Scott Voll<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:27 PM<br>To: c3voip<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br><br><br><br>CCx 4 to 5 was just a matter of opening in the editor and resaving. I<br>
would thing 7 would most likely be the same.<br><br><br><br>Scott<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM, c3voip <<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>We are getting a new CUCCX 7.0 box and would like to migrate some<br>
scripts from our IPCC Ent 4 cluster to it.<br><br><br><br>Is there a way to convert IPCC Ent. 4 scripts to CUCCX?<br><br><br><br>Thanks,<br><br>-C<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br>No virus found in this incoming message.<br>Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com/" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.10.23/1953 - Release Date:<br>02/17/09 07:07:00<br>
<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/c7ae6bc1/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/c7ae6bc1/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 28<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:48:33 -0800 (PST)<br>From: Vignesh <<a href="mailto:sathia_vign@yahoo.com">sathia_vign@yahoo.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity problem<br>
To: Victor Rodriguez <<a href="mailto:victor.rodriguez@neoris.com">victor.rodriguez@neoris.com</a>>,<br> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:385521.5149.qm@web56802.mail.re3.yahoo.com">385521.5149.qm@web56802.mail.re3.yahoo.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>I would recommend you to delete the E000.....logs and other edb files from the /exchsvr/mdbdata folder. Stop exchange information store and restart the service after deleting the logs. You may have to restart exchange after doing this.<br>
<br><br><br>________________________________<br>From: Victor Rodriguez <<a href="mailto:victor.rodriguez@neoris.com">victor.rodriguez@neoris.com</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 9:51:23 PM<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity problem<br><br><br>Hi.<br><br>I think this problem for you is very easy, but for me its<br>becoming a real headache I have a Unity (Cisco<br>Unity 4.0 Build 4.0(2)), the problem is regarding the priv1.edb file<br>
in the Microsoft exchange, the size is growing and growing 25G or more and the<br>Unity stop working, some person tell me if I do a NTBackup for the mailbox it<br>will fix that problem, but nothing happened the file keep growing, if you know<br>
how to solve this, please help me<br><br>Victor Rodriguez<br>________________________________<br> Este documento puede incluir<br>informaci?n confidencial y propiedad de Neoris y deber? ser le?do solamente por<br>la o las personas a quienes est? dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por<br>
error, por favor avise inmediatamente al remitente contestando y eliminando este<br>correo. Cualquier punto de vista u opiniones expresadas en este mensaje son del<br>remitente y no necesariamente coinciden con aquellas de Neoris. Este documento<br>
no deber? ser reproducido, copiado, distribuido, publicado, ni modificado por<br>terceros sin la autorizaci?n por escrito de Neoris.Este mensaje ha sido verificado contra virus. Vis?tenos en <a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a>.<br>
This document may include proprietary and<br>confidential information of Neoris, and may only be read by those person or<br>persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail message in<br>error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this<br>
message. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the<br>sender and do not necessarily coincide with those of Neoris. This document may<br>not be reproduced, copied, distributed, published, modified or furnished to<br>
third parties, without the prior written consent of Neoris.<br>This e-mail message has been<br>scanned for viruses and cleared. Visit us at <a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a>.<br>________________________________<br>
<br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/4ba678cd/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/4ba678cd/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 29<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:12:07 -0500 (EST)<br>From: "Rasim Duric" <<a href="mailto:rduric@uoguelph.ca">rduric@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity problem<br>
To: "'Victor Rodriguez'" <<a href="mailto:victor.rodriguez@neoris.com">victor.rodriguez@neoris.com</a>>,<br> <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Message-ID: <005701c9914c$c5ae8260$510b8720$@ca><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>I run NTBackup every day and once per year I do defragment Exchange<br>databases. I just follow this Microsoft Knowledge Base Article:<br>
<br><br><br><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328804" target="_blank">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328804</a><br><br><br><br><br><br>Rasim Duric<br><br>Network Analyst (CCS)<br><br>University of Guelph<br><br>Guelph, N1G 2W1, ON<br>
<br>519-824-4120x53146<br><br><a href="mailto:rduric@uoguelph.ca">rduric@uoguelph.ca</a><br><br><br><br>From: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] On Behalf Of Victor Rodriguez<br>
Sent: February-17-09 12:58<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity problem<br><br><br><br>Hi.<br><br><br><br>I think this problem for you is very easy, but for me its becoming a real<br>
headache I have a Unity (Cisco Unity 4.0 Build 4.0(2)), the problem is<br>regarding the priv1.edb file in the Microsoft exchange, the size is<br>growing and growing 25G or more and the Unity stop working, some person<br>tell me if I do a NTBackup for the mailbox it will fix that problem, but<br>
nothing happened the file keep growing, if you know how to solve this,<br>please help me<br><br><br><br>Victor Rodriguez<br><br><br><br> _____<br><br>Este documento puede incluir informaci?n confidencial y propiedad de<br>
Neoris y deber? ser le?do solamente por la o las personas a quienes est?<br>dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor avise<br>inmediatamente al remitente contestando y eliminando este correo.<br>Cualquier punto de vista u opiniones expresadas en este mensaje son del<br>
remitente y no necesariamente coinciden con aquellas de Neoris. Este<br>documento no deber? ser reproducido, copiado, distribuido, publicado, ni<br>modificado por terceros sin la autorizaci?n por escrito de Neoris.<br><br>
Este mensaje ha sido verificado contra virus. Vis?tenos en<br><outbind://91/<a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a>> <a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a>.<br>
<br>This document may include proprietary and confidential information of<br>Neoris, and may only be read by those person or persons to whom it is<br>addressed. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please<br>
advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Any<br>views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and do<br>not necessarily coincide with those of Neoris. This document may not be<br>
reproduced, copied, distributed, published, modified or furnished to third<br>parties, without the prior written consent of Neoris.<br><br>This e-mail message has been scanned for viruses and cleared. Visit us at<br><a href="http://www.neoris.com/" target="_blank">www.neoris.com</a>.<br>
<br> _____<br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/97cd203f/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/97cd203f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 30<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:23:05 -0600<br>From: "Michael Back" <<a href="mailto:Michael.Back@nisd.net">Michael.Back@nisd.net</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Billing server setup<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:499AE469.A494.00A3.0@nisd.net">499AE469.A494.00A3.0@nisd.net</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII<br>
<br>I am trying to figure out how the CDR export for billing servers works<br>on UCM7. I have an FTP server setup to test this temporarily. I have<br>configured the billing application server parameters with the IP,<br>
username, password, and path. Protocol is FTP for now. Enterprise<br>parameters for CDR is set to 1. I made a few calls on the cluster, but<br>no files are being exported to the ftp. I tested ftp access using the<br>same username and password, and everything works fine. What am I doing<br>
wrong? Thanks for your help.<br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 31<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:32:58 -0800<br>From: Scott Voll <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br>To: James Buchanan <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>, Matthew Loraditch<br>
<<a href="mailto:MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com">MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:f84a38d30902171432j3ebfe777x306a1f2d246d3b3e@mail.gmail.com">f84a38d30902171432j3ebfe777x306a1f2d246d3b3e@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>just remember if your using any external stuff that you have to have it<br>there. I use the holiday XML file and forgot to put it back on the new<br>server and it kept failing. Took me a while to figure it out.<br>
<br>=)<br><br>Scott<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:07 PM, James Buchanan <<a href="mailto:jbuchanan@ctiusa.com">jbuchanan@ctiusa.com</a>>wrote:<br><br>> Me too. Worked great. I did not find anything in the scripts that didn't<br>
> work with UCCX 7.<br>><br>><br>><br>> *From:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] *On Behalf Of *Matthew Loraditch<br>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:29 PM<br>> *To:* Scott Voll; c3voip<br>><br>> *Cc:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br>
><br>><br>><br>> That is how I did a conversion<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> *Matthew Loraditch*<br>> 1965 Greenspring Drive<br>><br>> Timonium, MD 21093<br>> <a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a><br>
> (p) (410) 252-8830<br>> (F) (443) 541-1593<br>><br>> Visit us at <a href="http://www.heliontechnologies.com/" target="_blank">www.heliontechnologies.com</a><br>> Support Issue? Email <a href="mailto:support@heliontechnologies.com">support@heliontechnologies.com</a> for fast assistance!<br>
><br>><br>><br>> *From:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [mailto:<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] *On Behalf Of *Scott Voll<br>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:27 PM<br>> *To:* c3voip<br>> *Cc:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Convert IPCC 4 scripts to CUCCX 7<br>
><br>><br>><br>> CCx 4 to 5 was just a matter of opening in the editor and resaving. I<br>> would thing 7 would most likely be the same.<br>><br>><br>><br>> Scott<br>><br>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM, c3voip <<a href="mailto:c3voip@nc.rr.com">c3voip@nc.rr.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>> We are getting a new CUCCX 7.0 box and would like to migrate some scripts<br>> from our IPCC Ent 4 cluster to it.<br>><br>><br>><br>> Is there a way to convert IPCC Ent. 4 scripts to CUCCX?<br>
><br>><br>><br>> Thanks,<br>><br>> -C<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br>><br>><br>> No virus found in this incoming message.<br>> Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com/" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>
> Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.10.23/1953 - Release Date: 02/17/09<br>> 07:07:00<br>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/1c5da087/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/1c5da087/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 32<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:16:34 -0600<br>From: Samuel Womack <<a href="mailto:womacksamuel@gmail.com">womacksamuel@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Billing server setup<br>
To: Michael Back <<a href="mailto:Michael.Back@nisd.net">Michael.Back@nisd.net</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:323ACFD2-08E3-48B1-8E3F-8B56806CAC9C@gmail.com">323ACFD2-08E3-48B1-8E3F-8B56806CAC9C@gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes<br><br>How about the Service Parameter...CDR is Disabled by default..<br><br>This setting is near the Top...<br><br>On Feb 17, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Michael Back wrote:<br>
<br>> I am trying to figure out how the CDR export for billing servers works<br>> on UCM7. I have an FTP server setup to test this temporarily. I have<br>> configured the billing application server parameters with the IP,<br>
> username, password, and path. Protocol is FTP for now. Enterprise<br>> parameters for CDR is set to 1. I made a few calls on the cluster,<br>> but<br>> no files are being exported to the ftp. I tested ftp access using the<br>
> same username and password, and everything works fine. What am I<br>> doing<br>> wrong? Thanks for your help.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 33<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:11:41 -0600<br>
From: "Michael Back" <<a href="mailto:Michael.Back@nisd.net">Michael.Back@nisd.net</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Billing server setup<br>To: <<a href="mailto:womacksamuel@gmail.com">womacksamuel@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:499B19FD020000A300001551@gwgwiavs.nisd.net">499B19FD020000A300001551@gwgwiavs.nisd.net</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII<br>
<br>I checked the service parameters and CDR is enabled.<br><br>>>> Samuel Womack <<a href="mailto:womacksamuel@gmail.com">womacksamuel@gmail.com</a>> 02/17/09 6:16 PM >>><br>How about the Service Parameter...CDR is Disabled by default..<br>
<br>This setting is near the Top...<br><br>On Feb 17, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Michael Back wrote:<br><br>> I am trying to figure out how the CDR export for billing servers works<br>> on UCM7. I have an FTP server setup to test this temporarily. I have<br>
> configured the billing application server parameters with the IP,<br>> username, password, and path. Protocol is FTP for now. Enterprise<br>> parameters for CDR is set to 1. I made a few calls on the cluster,<br>
> but<br>> no files are being exported to the ftp. I tested ftp access using the<br>> same username and password, and everything works fine. What am I<br>> doing<br>> wrong? Thanks for your help.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 34<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:38:23 -0500<br>From: Ed Leatherman <<a href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com">ealeatherman@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Billing server setup<br>
To: Michael Back <<a href="mailto:Michael.Back@nisd.net">Michael.Back@nisd.net</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:94a1afde0902171938i2658ee1cjbf2c926e20f4534b@mail.gmail.com">94a1afde0902171938i2658ee1cjbf2c926e20f4534b@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>the CDR service parameters have to be set on each server, it isnt<br>clusterwide (unless it was changed in 7)<br><br>On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Michael Back <<a href="mailto:Michael.Back@nisd.net">Michael.Back@nisd.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>> I am trying to figure out how the CDR export for billing servers works<br>> on UCM7. I have an FTP server setup to test this temporarily. I have<br>> configured the billing application server parameters with the IP,<br>
> username, password, and path. Protocol is FTP for now. Enterprise<br>> parameters for CDR is set to 1. I made a few calls on the cluster, but<br>> no files are being exported to the ftp. I tested ftp access using the<br>
> same username and password, and everything works fine. What am I doing<br>> wrong? Thanks for your help.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br><br><br><br>--<br>Ed Leatherman<br>Assistant Director, Voice Services<br>
West Virginia University<br>Telecommunications and Network Operations<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/f1a7d4c4/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/f1a7d4c4/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 35<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:41:30 -0700<br>From: Inder Singh <<a href="mailto:isingh68@gmail.com">isingh68@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip]<br> <0B9DBADCC054F343A927FD1BC72C60AB06FA53FE58@exchangemb-srv.baicv.local><br>
<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:ad6d8f230902172041t1e7d45a9o860e8c981a070932@mail.gmail.com">ad6d8f230902172041t1e7d45a9o860e8c981a070932@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Hello Antonio:<br><br>Your situation as you describe it...<br><br>H232 voice Gateway - E1 PRI<br>PTSN num - 2602300<br>Phone ext num 3xx<br>I want that when peopel call 2603301 it go to ext 301 and so on<br>
<br>Not knowing what you have configured so far I will start from the<br>beginning. Pardon me if I am repeating things you have already done...<br><br>1. Configure a pots dial peer to accept DID:<br> dial-peer voice x pots<br>
direct-inward-dial<br> incoming called-number .<br><br>2. Configure a voip dial peer to have the CallManager process incoming<br>calls<br> dial-peer voice y voip<br> destination-pattern 26023..<br>
session target ipv4:your_call_manager_ip<br><br>3. Configure a translation pattern and specify "26023XX", in the called<br>party transformation text box specify "3XX"<br><br>4. Configure phone with 3xx numbers<br>
<br>This should do the trick for inbound calling.<br><br>I hope this helps.<br><br>Regards. Inder.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/f1322b5c/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/f1322b5c/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 36<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:43:32 -0700<br>From: Inder Singh <<a href="mailto:isingh68@gmail.com">isingh68@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] DID<br>To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:ad6d8f230902172043q71b3b43ep8fa3567733c5c648@mail.gmail.com">ad6d8f230902172043q71b3b43ep8fa3567733c5c648@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>><br>> Hello Antonio:<br>><br>> Your situation as you describe it...<br>><br>> H232 voice Gateway - E1 PRI<br>> PTSN num - 2602300<br>> Phone ext num 3xx<br>> I want that when peopel call 2603301 it go to ext 301 and so on<br>
><br>> Not knowing what you have configured so far I will start from the<br>> beginning. Pardon me if I am repeating things you have already done...<br>><br>> 1. Configure a pots dial peer to accept DID:<br>
> dial-peer voice x pots<br>> direct-inward-dial<br>> incoming called-number .<br>><br>> 2. Configure a voip dial peer to have the CallManager process incoming<br>> calls<br>
> dial-peer voice y voip<br>> destination-pattern 26023..<br>> session target ipv4:your_call_manager_ip<br>><br>> 3. Configure a translation pattern and specify "26023XX", in the called<br>
> party transformation text box specify "3XX"<br>><br>> 4. Configure phone with 3xx numbers<br>><br>> This should do the trick for inbound calling.<br>><br>> I hope this helps.<br>><br>> Regards. Inder.<br>
><br>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/608dcd6d/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/608dcd6d/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 37<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:00:59 -0700<br>From: Inder Singh <<a href="mailto:isingh68@gmail.com">isingh68@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] VG224 and Call boxes<br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:ad6d8f230902172100g20badadfgd9e1f1c5d0c3e31f@mail.gmail.com">ad6d8f230902172100g20badadfgd9e1f1c5d0c3e31f@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Have you checked for a codec mismatch?<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/35d72c13/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/35d72c13/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 38<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:05:20 -0700<br>From: Inder Singh <<a href="mailto:isingh68@gmail.com">isingh68@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] NTP Reference for IP Phones<br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:ad6d8f230902172105g484b3e7er179b1c0c0c5666e@mail.gmail.com">ad6d8f230902172105g484b3e7er179b1c0c0c5666e@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>I had some clock issues are discovered that the phones sync with the<br>CallManager they are registered with. So as long as the callmanager they<br>are registered to has the correct time the phones will also.<br>
<br>After fixed the issue with the CallManager clock I had to reset the phone in<br>order to correct the time on the phone.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/9ffc50f1/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/9ffc50f1/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 39<br>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:14:36 -0700<br>From: Inder Singh <<a href="mailto:isingh68@gmail.com">isingh68@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] CME group phone broadcast<br>
To: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:ad6d8f230902172114p18eb4f35o149b705482e0f05f@mail.gmail.com">ad6d8f230902172114p18eb4f35o149b705482e0f05f@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>You need to configure the same phone number on every phone or overlay a<br>single number on each phone. When said number is dialed all phones will<br>ring.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/0157a3e1/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090217/0157a3e1/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 40<br>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:54:41 +0530<br>From: Aman Chugh <<a href="mailto:aman.chugh@gmail.com">aman.chugh@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Switch replacement causes one-way audio?<br>
To: "Biffle, Gerrad" <<a href="mailto:Gerrad.Biffle@greensboro-nc.gov">Gerrad.Biffle@greensboro-nc.gov</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:d4c697ad0902172124k4f7f8a34k4685e0c46c6ccb9f@mail.gmail.com">d4c697ad0902172124k4f7f8a34k4685e0c46c6ccb9f@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"<br>
<br>I had this issue occur once where we narrowed it down to a particular switch<br>, we rebooted that switch to correct the issue which I suspect was an arp<br>issue.<br>Aman<br><br>On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Scott Voll <<a href="mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com">svoll.voip@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>> I would check to make sure it's not a routing issue.<br>><br>> Scott<br>><br>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Biffle, Gerrad <<br>> <a href="mailto:Gerrad.Biffle@greensboro-nc.gov">Gerrad.Biffle@greensboro-nc.gov</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>>> This past weekend our network team replaced some aging 4006s with 3750<br>>> stacks. Since then we've had users complaining that callers on the far<br>>> end cannot hear them. Our first thought was to hard code the switch-port<br>
>> to 100/full (we're using 7960Gs) ? and that didn't seem to help.<br>>><br>>> Does anyone have any ideas on what we could check before opening a TAC<br>>> case tomorrow?<br>>><br>>> Thanks.<br>
>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> =======================================================<br>>> Please note that email sent to and from this address is subject<br>>> to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to<br>
>> third parties.<br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>>><br>>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090218/d85f6e0d/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090218/d85f6e0d/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 41<br>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:55:46 -0500<br>From: Wes Sisk <<a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Billing server setup<br>
To: Ed Leatherman <<a href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com">ealeatherman@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>, Michael Back <<a href="mailto:Michael.Back@nisd.net">Michael.Back@nisd.net</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:499C0552.6060903@cisco.com">499C0552.6060903@cisco.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"<br><br>another option is cdr file duration. this defaults to 60 seconds. some<br>
customers set it to the equivalent of 24 hours. with that configuration<br>a file is only generated once ever 24 hours. once a file is completed<br>it would be transferred to billing server.<br><br>On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:38:23 PM, Ed Leatherman<br>
<<a href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com">ealeatherman@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> the CDR service parameters have to be set on each server, it isnt<br>> clusterwide (unless it was changed in 7)<br>><br>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Michael Back <<a href="mailto:Michael.Back@nisd.net">Michael.Back@nisd.net</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Michael.Back@nisd.net">Michael.Back@nisd.net</a>>> wrote:<br>><br>> I am trying to figure out how the CDR export for billing servers works<br>> on UCM7. I have an FTP server setup to test this temporarily. I have<br>
> configured the billing application server parameters with the IP,<br>> username, password, and path. Protocol is FTP for now. Enterprise<br>> parameters for CDR is set to 1. I made a few calls on the<br>
> cluster, but<br>> no files are being exported to the ftp. I tested ftp access using the<br>> same username and password, and everything works fine. What am I<br>> doing<br>> wrong? Thanks for your help.<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> --<br>> Ed Leatherman<br>> Assistant Director, Voice Services<br>
> West Virginia University<br>> Telecommunications and Network Operations<br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090218/a7450706/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090218/a7450706/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 42<br>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:01:00 -0500<br>From: "Miller, Steve" <MillerS@DicksteinShapiro.COM><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] When is End of Life for Call Manager 4.1?<br>
To: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck-nether.net">cisco-voip@puck-nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:418329B7ED67E64BBD2BAA97078D70D009DF2C@DCEX2.DSMO.COM">418329B7ED67E64BBD2BAA97078D70D009DF2C@DCEX2.DSMO.COM</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>I thought it was May, but now I am hearing July?<br><br><br>Steve Miller<br>Telecom Engineer<br>Dickstein Shapiro LLP<br>1825 Eye Street NW | Washington, DC 20006<br>
Tel (202) 420-3370| Fax (202) 330-5607<br><a href="mailto:MillerS@dicksteinshapiro.com">MillerS@dicksteinshapiro.com</a><br><br><br><br>--------------------------------------------------------<br>This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)<br>
named above. This communication may contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other<br>privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for delivering this confidential<br>communication to the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review, use,<br>
dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this e-mail message and any attached files<br>is strictly prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor any communication that is created,<br>
received, or sent on its network. If you have received this confidential communication in error, please notify the<br>sender immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message.<br><br>To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to <a href="mailto:postmaster@dicksteinshapiro.com">postmaster@dicksteinshapiro.com</a><br>
<br>Dickstein Shapiro LLP<br><a href="http://www.dicksteinshapiro.com/" target="_blank">http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com</a><br><br>==============================================================================<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090218/7dd68b15/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090218/7dd68b15/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 43<br>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:57:59 +0530<br>From: Aman Chugh <<a href="mailto:aman.chugh@gmail.com">aman.chugh@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Call Forward on failure<br>
To: cisco-voip mailinglist <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:d4c697ad0902180527g73cb7586le9e8f76148681f8a@mail.gmail.com">d4c697ad0902180527g73cb7586le9e8f76148681f8a@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>I n...<br><br>[Message clipped] </blockquote></div><br>