My experience would dictate otherwise. Whatever I set as my Line Display gets shown to the person I call. I've also never submitted anything to my carriers about which name is attached to which phone number.<br><br>Sean<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:57 AM, JASON BURWELL <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:JASON.BURWELL@foundersfcu.com">JASON.BURWELL@foundersfcu.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font size="2" color="#0000ff" face="Arial">I have been looking in to this recently and have been
told by several providers there is a national database that contains all Caller
ID Name records. I am told when a incoming call hits the PSTN, the provider
delivering the call to the called party takes the 10 digit number being sent and
does a data dip to the national database for the name and sends that along with
the number to the called party. Supposedly the provider that owns the DID
controls what name is registered to what number. If no name is available in the
database the city/state of the call is displayed based on NPA/NXX or "unknown
caller" depending on the provider of the called party. I do not have all the
details but have been told the same thing by technical people from several large
carriers.</font></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div align="left"><span></span><font face="Arial"><font color="#0000ff"><font size="2">J<span>ason</span></font></font></font><br></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left" lang="en-us">
<hr>
<font size="2" face="Tahoma"><div class="im"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Matthew
Linsemier<br></div><b>Sent:</b> Monday, March 09, 2009 12:34 PM<div class="im"><br><b>To:</b> Sean
Walberg<br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re:
[cisco-voip] Different outbound caller name for internal vs external
calls<br></div></font><br></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div></div><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That’s interesting to say the least as there are no
other places (route groups, route lists, or route patterns) to change the
calling name. Who is the provider? <br><br><br>On 3/9/09 12:19 PM,
"Sean Walberg" <<a href="http://sean@ertw.com" target="_blank">sean@ertw.com</a>>
wrote:<br><br></span></font>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Maybe things are different here, but I'm able to
change my Line Display field to whatever I want, and it shows up on the other
end when I call.<br><br>>From debug isdn q931, bold line obviously my
doing:<br><br> Bearer Capability i =
0x8090A2<br>
Standard =
CCITT<br>
Transfer Capability =
Speech<br>
Transfer Mode =
Circuit<br>
Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s<br>
Channel ID i =
0xA98394<br>
Exclusive, Channel 20<br> <b> Display
i = 0xB1, 'Line Display'<br></b>
Calling Party Number i = 0x0081,
'MYNUMBER'<br>
Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown<br>
Called Party Number i = 0x80,
'WHOICALLED'<br>
Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown<br>Mar 9 11:14:40.649 CDT: ISDN Se0/0/0:23
Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref =
0xFBF8<br> Channel ID i =
0xA98394<br>
Exclusive, Channel 20<br><br><br>I changed my line display field to "Line
Display" and called home. The problem is that "Line Display" also show up if I
call someone internally.<br><br>Sean<br><br><br>On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:03
AM, Matthew Linsemier <<a href="http://mlinsemier@apassurance.com" target="_blank">mlinsemier@apassurance.com</a>>
wrote:<br></span></font>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">External caller ID is controlled by the LEC so there
isn’t really away to dynamically send different calling name based on
number. Additionally, the LEC (at least AT&T) only allows you one
calling name per circuit number, so it’s not that you could have multiple
calling name associated with different DID ranges on a circuit. <br><br>You
can however have the LEC assign a static calling name, and then just use a
route list, group, or pattern to swap out DID for 123-456-1000 in which your
static assigned calling name would be
displayed.<br><br>Matt<br><br><br><br>On 3/9/09 11:13 AM, "Sean Walberg"
<<a href="http://sean@ertw.com" target="_blank">sean@ertw.com</a> <<a href="http://sean@ertw.com" target="_blank">http://sean@ertw.com</a>> >
wrote:<br><br></span></font>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I've got Call Manager 6.1.2 with an IOS H.323
gateway and a PRI.<br><br>One site would like to have caller id if they're
calling another IP phone (Fred Smith, 1234), but a generic name/number if
they call outside (MyCo, 123-456-1000).<br><br>I know I can use the
external number mask to take care of the number, but can the name be done?
Is there a way to do it per phone? Some phones want no restrictions, some
want "MyCo, 123-456-1000" and some others want "MyCo News Desk,
123-456-1100"<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Sean<br></span></font></blockquote><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br></span></font><font color="#808080"><font size="2"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">
<hr size="3" width="100%" align="center">
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT<br>This communication and any attachments are
CONFIDENTIAL and may be protected by one or more legal privileges. It is
intended solely for the use of the addressee identified above. If you are
not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of
this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this information block, the
typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to
constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
communication from your computer. Thank you.</span></font></font><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
<br></span></font></font><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br><font color="#808080">
<hr size="3" width="100%" align="center">
</font></span></font></blockquote><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br><br></span></font></blockquote>
<p><font size="1" color="#808080" face="Arial">
<hr>
</font>
</p><p></p>
<p><font color="#808080"><font size="1" face="Arial">CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT<br>This
communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be protected by one
or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee
identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure,
copying or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this
information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this
message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific
statement to the contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
communication from your computer. Thank you.</font> </font></p>
<p><font color="#808080">
<hr>
</font>
</p><p></p></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Sean Walberg <<a href="mailto:sean@ertw.com">sean@ertw.com</a>> <a href="http://ertw.com/">http://ertw.com/</a><br>