We have had good luck using the 48 port angled 2U patch panels with vertical cable management and no horizontal management. The key is to use the slack spools and the same length cables.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk">A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br>
> We've been using "low-density" patch panels; 24 ports in each RU; so a<br>
> 48 port ends up being 2 RUs with an additional RU for cable management.<br>
><br>
> What experiences have you had with "high-density" panels, either 48<br>
> ports per U, or the kind of panel that has the jacks angled out so cable<br>
> management isn't required?<br>
<br>
i'm interested in responses - as we also use 24P/RU as you do - with a 48port<br>
switch feeding 2 RU and a cable management bar to keep things neat.<br>
<br>
alan<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Ben Story CCSP, CCDA<br><br>