<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>I use loopback addresses even for MGCP.<br><br>It's great, because if we ever make network changes, I don't care. Plus, with redundant links, you pretty much need them. Loopbacks that is.<br><br><br><br><br><br>---<br>Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Paul" <asobihoudai@yahoo.com><br>To: "Steven Sarte" <steven.sarte@gmail.com>, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:43:44 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Building new CallManager with fake IP Address for H.323 addresses.<br><br><br>I think it'd be best practice for you to configure a loopback interface as the H.323 interface for the gateways.<br><br><br><br>----- Original Message ----<br>From: Steven Sarte <steven.sarte@gmail.com><br>To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:28:50 PM<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Building new CallManager with fake IP Address for H.323 addresses.<br><br>Do you think it might be an issue if I use dummy IP Addresses for<br>Voice Gateways with the protocol H.323. The reason is I have over 25<br>sites to configure and thought it would be easier to configure all<br>sites day one.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Steven Sarte<br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br><br><br><br> <br><br>_______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br></div></body></html>