<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>Yes, it would require some routing updates. <br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Steven Sarte" <steven.sarte@gmail.com><br>To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio@uoguelph.ca><br>Cc: "Paul" <asobihoudai@yahoo.com>, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:11:05 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Building new CallManager with fake IP Address for H.323 addresses.<br><br>I would love to use Loopbacks, but that would require a significant<br>change in routing. Inherited all sites using static routes.<br><br>On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio@uoguelph.ca> wrote:<br>> I use loopback addresses even for MGCP.<br>><br>> It's great, because if we ever make network changes, I don't care. Plus,<br>> with redundant links, you pretty much need them. Loopbacks that is.<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> ---<br>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^I ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt<br>><br>><br>> ----- Original Message -----<br>> From: "Paul" <asobihoudai@yahoo.com><br>> To: "Steven Sarte" <steven.sarte@gmail.com>, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:43:44 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Building new CallManager with fake IP Address for<br>> H.323 addresses.<br>><br>><br>> I think it'd be best practice for you to configure a loopback interface as<br>> the H.323 interface for the gateways.<br>><br>><br>><br>> ----- Original Message ----<br>> From: Steven Sarte <steven.sarte@gmail.com><br>> To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:28:50 PM<br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Building new CallManager with fake IP Address for<br>> H.323 addresses.<br>><br>> Do you think it might be an issue if I use dummy IP Addresses for<br>> Voice Gateways with the protocol H.323. The reason is I have over 25<br>> sites to configure and thought it would be easier to configure all<br>> sites day one.<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>> Steven Sarte<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>><br></div></body></html>