Well that's a bit discouraging, as I surely cannot afford a 2800 series or better router in my lab =(<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Nick Matthews <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthn@gmail.com">matthn@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">While the 2600 supports CUBE, it won't have 12.4(20)T support. I say<br>
this as a fair warning because there are a number of SIP/CUBE<br>
situations that require 12.4(20)T.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
-nick<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Tanner Ezell <<a href="mailto:tanner.ezell@gmail.com">tanner.ezell@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> That was my thought, I noticed it was not listed as compatible but some of the commands were available. Ill have to see about getting a 2610XM or so<br>
> ------Original Message------<br>
> From: Nick Matthews<br>
> Sender: <a href="mailto:matthn@gmail.com">matthn@gmail.com</a><br>
> To: Tanner Ezell<br>
> Cc: VOIP Group<br>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 1760 as a IPIPGW (CUBE)<br>
> Sent: Apr 5, 2009 9:21 AM<br>
><br>
> You can accomplish something very close to CUBE, but no, it will not<br>
> be a CUBE. There isn't any IPIPGW code for the 1760.<br>
><br>
> The commands exist in non CUBE software packages, but there is a<br>
> slight variation in many of the corner case scenarios that makes it<br>
> work more like a SBC instead of a terminating gateway. The commands<br>
> 'allow-connections h323-to-h323' and such have been around for<br>
> CUBE-like scenarios like routing calls between two CMEs to CUE<br>
> (SIP-H323). This behavior is different from actual IPIPGW<br>
> implementation.<br>
><br>
> As well, there were large improvements in CUBE in 12.4(20)T,<br>
> especially with SIP. If you're doing SIP at all 12.4(20)T is a good<br>
> place to start at, and since the 1760 is being phased out, 12.4(15)T<br>
> is the last release for that platform.<br>
><br>
> Short story - it's not a CUBE capable router, but you may get lucky<br>
> and have it work if you're dealing with the simple standard-case<br>
> situations (not supplementary services).<br>
><br>
><br>
> -nick<br>
><br>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Tanner Ezell <<a href="mailto:tanner.ezell@gmail.com">tanner.ezell@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I've been toying with a 1760, trying to get it to act as an IP to IP Gateway<br>
>> with limited success, calls come in as h323, but I never see any attempt to<br>
>> go out as SIP. I am beginning to wonder if the device is even capable.<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>