<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Hi Damien,<BR>
<BR>
It sounds like you want to be masking the calling party at the route pattern level with no modification at the route list level. I think I might not be understanding you exact scenario and goal, but that’s what it sounds like.<BR>
<BR>
Chris Ward <BR>
<BR>
<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="3" WIDTH="95%"><B>From: </B>Damien Ball <<a href="balld@gcs.k12.nc.us">balld@gcs.k12.nc.us</a>><BR>
<B>Date: </B>Fri, 1 May 2009 10:15:10 -0400 (EDT)<BR>
<B>To: </B><<a href="cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><BR>
<B>Subject: </B>[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>I'm looking at using local route groups with my call system. I am currently masking the calling party information at the Route List. The reason for this is that I'm not mapping DIDs to individual phones, but I have all calls from a specific site masked as one telephone number (which dials back into the receptionist or UC call handler). If i'm using one global route list, is there a way to preserve this configuration or is it a lost cause? I'm using Call manager 7.0.2 and Unity Connection 7.0.2. I am routing these calls through 2 PRIs (each in different calling areas with different providers).<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="3" WIDTH="95%"></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Consolas, Courier New, Courier"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>_______________________________________________<BR>
cisco-voip mailing list<BR>
<a href="cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><BR>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>