<div>Hi</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I meant VG224 ... we will use VG224 for simple Phone, Fax connectivity and some Hotline extensions, do you feel that MGCP will have some issues with that. Like the delayed FAX tone that we are experiencing now.<br><br>
Thanks </div>
<div>Gin</div>
<div> </div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Paul <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asobihoudai@yahoo.com">asobihoudai@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote"><br>Having a problem with your spell checker or does your keyboard have honey in it?<br><br>I have no idea what you're talking about when you say VGE. If you mean VG224 and you're using it as an MGCP gateway, I highly recommend you change it to be controlled via Skinny. Skinny-controlled VG224s are chock full of feature-filling goodness!<br>
<br>[and you should then configure the box to use fax passthrough instead of relay unless you're insistent on using G.729....]<br><br><br><br><br>________________________________<br>From: Gin Murray <<a href="mailto:kinusca@gmail.com">kinusca@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:38:57 PM<br>Subject: [cisco-voip] Fax Machines having a very delayed response<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br><br>Hi<br><br>I have conencted fa machines to VGE device configured as an MGCP gateway and we get a very delayed response ie teh fax tione comes very late and hence it is a problem sending a fa ..<br>
<br>can you please tell me what I shud be changinging.. I use CCM 4.2.3<br><br><br><br><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>