Exactly, I don't see any solution for this. The reason is simple - where wil you put the GK? one GK in each site will required!<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Wes Sisk <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wsisk@cisco.com">wsisk@cisco.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div style="">not single hub<div>not multiple hub</div><div><br></div><div>there is a tiered CAC model where</div>
<div><br></div><div><font face="Courier" size="4"><span style="font-size: 14px;">region1-----region2</span></font></div><div><font face="Courier" size="4"><span style="font-size: 14px;"> | |</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Courier" size="4"><span style="font-size: 14px;"> cm1 cm2</span></font></div><div><font face="Courier" size="4"><span style="font-size: 14px;">/ \ / \</span></font></div><div><font face="Courier" size="4"><span style="font-size: 14px;">loc1 loc2 loc3 loc4</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Courier" size="4"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font face="Courier" size="4"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font face="Courier" size="4"><span style="font-size: 14px;">use CM locations CAC between locations and GK CAC between regions</span></font></div>
<div><br></div><div><div>but i cannot directly see how any of these match your model. tiered may be closest. sounds like RSVP to me?</div><div><br></div><div>/Wes</div></div><div><br><div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div>On May 23, 2009, at 4:16 AM, FrogOnDSCP46EF wrote:</div><br>I was wondering what would be the best practice for calculating CCM CAC bandwidth in MESS type WAN topology and Centralize call processing environment.<br><br>
Assuming 3 sites - HQ , siteb and sitec in TRIANGLE. All sites are conencted via a MPLS cloude in the middle. Each site has 1 megs of SYMETRIC bandwidth.<br> also assumeing 100 users at each location. CCM is kept in HQ. SITEB and C are SRST routers (and not CME).<br>
<br>frog<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Smile, you'll save someone else's day!<br>Frog<br></div></div> _______________________________________________<br>cisco-voip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br></div><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Smile, you'll save someone else's day!<br>
Frog<br>
<div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258236686" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_"></div><div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258236687" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_"></div><div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258236688" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_">
</div><div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258236689" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_"></div><div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258236694" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_"></div><div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258236695" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_">
</div><div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258236696" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_"></div><div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258237276" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_"></div><div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258237277" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_">
</div><div style="visibility: hidden;" title="1243258237277" id="_booktextmark_tab_id_"></div>